Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Parasites and Vector Biology Research Unit (PAVBRU), University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon.
Research Foundation in Tropical Diseases and the Environment (REFOTDE), Buea, Cameroon.
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 16;20(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05009-3.
The control of lymphatic filariasis (LF) caused by Wuchereria bancrofti in the Central African Region has been hampered by the presence of Loa loa due to severe adverse events that arise in the treatment with ivermectin. The immunochromatographic test (ICT) cards used for mapping LF demonstrated cross-reactivity with L. loa and posed the problem of delineating the LF map. To verify LF endemicity in forest areas of Cameroon where mass drug administration (MDA) has not been ongoing, we used the recently developed strategy that combined serology, microscopy and molecular techniques.
This study was carried out in 124 communities in 31 health districts (HDs) where L. loa is present. At least 125 persons per site were screened. Diurnal blood samples were investigated for circulating filarial antigen (CFA) by FTS and for L. loa microfilariae (mf) using TBF. FTS positive individuals were further subjected to night blood collection for detecting W. bancrofti. qPCR was used to detect DNA of the parasites.
Overall, 14,446 individuals took part in this study, 233 participants tested positive with FTS in 29 HDs, with positivity rates ranging from 0.0 to 8.2%. No W. bancrofti mf was found in the night blood of any individuals but L. loa mf were found in both day and night blood of participants who were FTS positive. Also, qPCR revealed that no W. bancrofti but L.loa DNA was found with dry bloodspot. Positive FTS results were strongly associated with high L. loa mf load. Similarly, a strong positive association was observed between FTS positivity and L loa prevalence.
Using a combination of parasitological and molecular tools, we were unable to find evidence of W. bancrofti presence in the 31 HDs, but L. loa instead. Therefore, LF is not endemic and LF MDA is not required in these districts.
由于伊维菌素治疗会引发严重不良反应,导致中非地区的班氏丝虫病(LF)控制受到罗阿丝虫的阻碍。用于绘制 LF 地图的免疫层析检测(ICT)卡与罗阿丝虫发生交叉反应,这造成了 LF 地图绘制的问题。为了验证在未开展大规模药物治疗(MDA)的喀麦隆森林地区 LF 的流行情况,我们使用了最近开发的结合血清学、显微镜和分子技术的策略。
本研究在存在罗阿丝虫的 31 个卫生区(HD)的 124 个社区进行。每个地点至少筛查 125 人。使用 FTS 检测昼间血样中的循环丝状抗原(CFA),使用 TBF 检测罗阿丝虫微丝蚴(mf)。FTS 阳性者进一步采集夜间血样,用于检测班氏吴策线虫。qPCR 用于检测寄生虫的 DNA。
共有 14446 人参与了这项研究,29 个 HD 中有 233 人 FTS 检测阳性,阳性率为 0.0 至 8.2%。任何个体的夜间血样中均未发现班氏吴策线虫 mf,但 FTS 阳性者的日间和夜间血样中均发现罗阿丝虫 mf。此外,干血斑 qPCR 显示无班氏吴策线虫,但存在罗阿丝虫 DNA。FTS 阳性结果与高罗阿丝虫 mf 载量呈强相关。同样,FTS 阳性与罗阿丝虫流行率之间也存在强烈的正相关。
使用寄生虫学和分子工具的组合,我们未能在 31 个 HD 中发现班氏吴策线虫存在的证据,但发现了罗阿丝虫。因此,这些地区不存在 LF 流行,不需要开展 LF MDA。