• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型冠状病毒肺炎检测的合理应用。

The Appropriate Use of Testing for COVID-19.

机构信息

Kendall Regional Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Miami, Florida; Nova Southeastern University, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Davie, Florida.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2020 Apr 13;21(3):470-472. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.4.47370.

DOI:10.5811/westjem.2020.4.47370
PMID:32302278
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7234686/
Abstract

Many public officials are calling for increased testing for the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), and some governments have taken extraordinary measures to increase the availability of testing. However, little has been published about the sensitivity and specificity of the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) nasopharyngeal swabs that are commonly used for testing. This narrative review evaluates the literature regarding the accuracy of these tests, and makes recommendations based on this literature. In brief, a negative RT-PCR nasopharyngeal swab test is insufficient to rule out COVID-19. Thus, over-reliance on the results of the test may be dangerous, and the push for widespread testing may be overstated.

摘要

许多政府官员呼吁增加对 2019 年新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的检测,一些政府已经采取了非凡的措施来增加检测的可用性。然而,对于通常用于检测的逆转录-聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)鼻咽拭子的敏感性和特异性,发表的内容很少。本叙述性综述评估了有关这些测试准确性的文献,并根据这些文献提出了建议。简而言之,阴性 RT-PCR 鼻咽拭子检测不足以排除 COVID-19。因此,过度依赖检测结果可能是危险的,而广泛检测的推动可能被夸大了。

相似文献

1
The Appropriate Use of Testing for COVID-19.新型冠状病毒肺炎检测的合理应用。
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Apr 13;21(3):470-472. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.4.47370.
2
Value of swab types and collection time on SARS-COV-2 detection using RT-PCR assay.拭子类型和采集时间对 RT-PCR 检测 SARS-COV-2 的影响。
J Virol Methods. 2020 Dec;286:113974. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.113974. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
3
Performance of Abbott ID Now COVID-19 Rapid Nucleic Acid Amplification Test Using Nasopharyngeal Swabs Transported in Viral Transport Media and Dry Nasal Swabs in a New York City Academic Institution.雅培 ID Now COVID-19 快速核酸扩增检测试剂使用鼻咽拭子和干鼻拭子在纽约市学术机构中运输的病毒运输介质的性能。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jul 23;58(8). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01136-20.
4
Exploring alternative swabs for use in SARS-CoV-2 detection from the oropharynx and anterior nares.探讨用于从口咽和鼻腔前部检测 SARS-CoV-2 的替代拭子。
J Virol Methods. 2020 Nov;285:113948. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.113948. Epub 2020 Aug 9.
5
Presence of viral RNA of SARS-CoV-2 in conjunctival swab specimens of COVID-19 patients.SARS-CoV-2 的病毒 RNA 存在于 COVID-19 患者的结膜拭子标本中。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun;68(6):1015-1017. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1287_20.
6
Evaluation of performance of two SARS-CoV-2 Rapid IgM-IgG combined antibody tests on capillary whole blood samples from the fingertip.评价两种 SARS-CoV-2 快速 IgM-IgG 联合抗体检测试剂盒在指尖毛细血管全血样本中的性能。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 17;15(9):e0237694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237694. eCollection 2020.
7
Proposal of RT-PCR-Based Mass Population Screening for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (Coronavirus Disease 2019).基于 RT-PCR 的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(COVID-19)大规模人群筛查提案。
J Mol Diagn. 2020 Oct;22(10):1294-1299. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2020.07.001. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
8
Covid-19: testing times.新冠疫情:考验时刻。
BMJ. 2020 Apr 8;369:m1403. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1403.
9
Combination of RT-qPCR testing and clinical features for diagnosis of COVID-19 facilitates management of SARS-CoV-2 outbreak.采用逆转录定量聚合酶链反应(RT-qPCR)检测与临床特征相结合的方法诊断新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19),有助于对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)疫情进行管控。
J Med Virol. 2020 Jun;92(6):538-539. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25721. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
10
Reliability of induced sputum test is greater than that of throat swab test for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19: A multi-center cross-sectional study.诱导痰检测的可靠性大于咽拭子检测,可用于检测 COVID-19 患者的 SARS-CoV-2:一项多中心横断面研究。
Virulence. 2020 Dec;11(1):1394-1401. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2020.1831342.

引用本文的文献

1
Associated Factors and Outcomes of Acute Kidney Injury in COVID-19 Patients in Kenya.肯尼亚新冠病毒肺炎患者急性肾损伤的相关因素及结局
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2024 Jan 29;11:20543581241227015. doi: 10.1177/20543581241227015. eCollection 2024.
2
Family physicians overestimate diagnosis probabilities regardless of the test results.无论检查结果如何,家庭医生都会高估诊断概率。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jan 8;10:1123689. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1123689. eCollection 2023.
3
The impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on the first COVID-19 epidemic wave in South Africa.非药物干预措施对南非首例 COVID-19 疫情的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Aug 5;23(1):1492. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16162-0.
4
Effect of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Procedures: Experience of a Tertiary Care Center From Eastern India.2019冠状病毒病大流行对胃肠内镜检查程序的影响:来自印度东部一家三级护理中心的经验
Cureus. 2023 Jul 3;15(7):e41315. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41315. eCollection 2023 Jul.
5
Mechanisms, Techniques and Devices of Airborne Virus Detection: A Review. airborne 病毒检测的机制、技术和设备:综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Apr 11;20(8):5471. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20085471.
6
Comparison of capillary blood and plasma samples for the evaluation of seroprevalence to SARS-CoV-2 antibodies by lateral flow immunoassay in a university population in Medellín, Colombia, 2020.2020年,在哥伦比亚麦德林的一所大学人群中,通过侧向流动免疫测定法比较毛细血管血样和血浆样本以评估SARS-CoV-2抗体血清阳性率。
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2023 Jun;5:100347. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2022.100347. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
7
Continued disruptions in health care services and mental health among health care providers during the COVID-19 pandemic in five sub-Saharan African countries.在五个撒哈拉以南非洲国家的 COVID-19 大流行期间,卫生保健提供者的医疗服务和心理健康持续中断。
J Glob Health. 2022 Nov 12;12:05046. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.05046.
8
Tomography and Prognostic Indices in the State of the Art of Evaluation in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia.COVID-19肺炎住院患者评估现状中的断层扫描与预后指标
Pathogens. 2022 Nov 1;11(11):1281. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11111281.
9
Host transcriptional responses in nasal swabs identify potential SARS-CoV-2 infection in PCR negative patients.鼻拭子中的宿主转录反应可识别PCR阴性患者中潜在的SARS-CoV-2感染。
iScience. 2022 Nov 18;25(11):105310. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105310. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
10
Risk of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Transmission Through Solid Organ Transplantation and Outcomes of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Among Recent Transplant Recipients.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2通过实体器官移植传播的风险及近期移植受者中2019冠状病毒病的结局
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 May 2;9(7):ofac221. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac221. eCollection 2022 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Different Types of Clinical Specimens.SARS-CoV-2 在不同类型临床标本中的检测。
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1843-1844. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.3786.
2
Epidemiologic Features and Clinical Course of Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2 in Singapore.新加坡 2019 年新型冠状病毒肺炎患者的流行病学特征和临床病程
JAMA. 2020 Apr 21;323(15):1488-1494. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.3204.
3
Comparison of different samples for 2019 novel coronavirus detection by nucleic acid amplification tests.比较不同样本的核酸扩增检测用于 2019 新型冠状病毒检测。
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Apr;93:264-267. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.02.050. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
4
Clinical Characteristics of Imported Cases of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Jiangsu Province: A Multicenter Descriptive Study.江苏省输入性新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)病例的临床特征:一项多中心描述性研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 28;71(15):706-712. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa199.
5
Negative Nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal Swabs Do Not Rule Out COVID-19.鼻咽和口咽拭子检测结果为阴性不能排除感染新冠病毒。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Apr 23;58(5). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00297-20.
6
Sensitivity of Chest CT for COVID-19: Comparison to RT-PCR.胸部CT对新型冠状病毒肺炎的敏感性:与逆转录聚合酶链反应的比较。
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E115-E117. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200432. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
7
Chest CT for Typical Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pneumonia: Relationship to Negative RT-PCR Testing.胸部 CT 与典型 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)肺炎:与阴性 RT-PCR 检测的关系。
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E41-E45. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200343. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
8
Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR.实时 RT-PCR 检测 2019 新型冠状病毒(2019-nCoV)
Euro Surveill. 2020 Jan;25(3). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045.