• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为谁行动,反对什么?群体成员身份与参与社会变革的多种途径。

Acting for whom, against what? Group membership and multiple paths to engagement in social change.

作者信息

Craig Maureen A, Badaan Vivienne, Brown Riana M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, New York University, United States.

Department of Psychology, New York University, United States.

出版信息

Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Oct;35:41-48. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.002. Epub 2020 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.002
PMID:32305036
Abstract

In a connected and politically engaged world, it is essential to understand how, why, and when people from diverse backgrounds may support social action. Integrating findings from the collective action, solidarity, and allyship literatures, we present working models of how the lenses through which individuals possessing different group memberships may psychologically identify (as part of the targeted group, an inclusive stigmatized identity, or the societally dominant group) and perceive injustice (as exclusively affecting the targeted group, inclusively affecting the target group and one's ingroup, or perceiving ingroup privileges) may shape social change efforts. We highlight disparate effects of positive (and negative) contact between groups on the mobilization of socially dominant and stigmatized groups that may provide challenges to diverse coalitions seeking social change.

摘要

在一个相互关联且政治参与度高的世界里,理解来自不同背景的人们如何、为何以及何时可能支持社会行动至关重要。整合集体行动、团结和盟友关系文献的研究结果,我们提出了一些工作模型,说明拥有不同群体成员身份的个体如何在心理上认同(作为目标群体的一部分、具有包容性的污名化身份或社会主导群体)以及如何看待不公正(仅影响目标群体、同时影响目标群体和自己的内群体、或察觉到内群体特权),这可能会塑造社会变革努力。我们强调了群体之间积极(和消极)接触对社会主导群体和污名化群体动员的不同影响,这可能给寻求社会变革的多元联盟带来挑战。

相似文献

1
Acting for whom, against what? Group membership and multiple paths to engagement in social change.为谁行动,反对什么?群体成员身份与参与社会变革的多种途径。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Oct;35:41-48. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.002. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
2
Where did inaction go? Towards a broader and more refined perspective on collective actions.不作为去了哪里?走向对集体行动更广泛和更精细的视角。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2019 Jul;58(3):649-667. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12295. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
3
Social psychological research on prejudice as collective action supporting emergent ingroup members.社会心理学对偏见作为支持新兴内群体成员的集体行动的研究。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2019 Jan;58(1):1-32. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12294. Epub 2018 Nov 17.
4
When Is Group Membership Zero-Sum? Effects of Ethnicity, Threat, and Social Identity on Dual National Identity.群体成员身份何时是零和的?种族、威胁和社会认同对双重国籍身份的影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 22;10(6):e0130539. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130539. eCollection 2015.
5
Social group membership and an incidental ingroup-memory advantage.社会群体归属与偶然的内群体记忆优势。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Jan;74(1):166-178. doi: 10.1177/1747021820948721. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
6
Are we all in this together?: co-victimization,inclusive social identity and collective action in solidarity with the disadvantaged.我们都在同一条船上吗?:共同受害、包容性社会认同与为弱势群体团结一致的集体行动。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2011 Dec;50(4):707-25. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02073.x.
7
Striving for success in outgroup settings: effects of contextually emphasizing ingroup dimensions on stigmatized group members' social identity and performance styles.在外群体环境中追求成功:情境性强调内群体维度对受污名化群体成员社会认同和表现风格的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 May;32(5):576-88. doi: 10.1177/0146167205283336.
8
Application of social identity theory in group therapy with stigmatized adults.社会认同理论在针对有污名化经历成年人的团体治疗中的应用。
Int J Group Psychother. 2002 Jan;52(1):121-30. doi: 10.1521/ijgp.52.1.121.45468.
9
Commonality and the complexity of "we": social attitudes and social change.“我们”的共性与复杂性:社会态度与社会变革
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2009 Feb;13(1):3-20. doi: 10.1177/1088868308326751.
10
Can self-verification strivings fully transcend the self-other barrier? Seeking verification of ingroup identities.自我验证的努力能否完全超越自我-他人的障碍?寻求群体认同的验证。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Dec;97(6):1021-44. doi: 10.1037/a0016358.

引用本文的文献

1
Your needs or mine? The role of allies' needs and their perceptions of disadvantaged groups' needs in motivating solidarity-based actions.你的需求还是我的需求?盟友的需求及其对弱势群体需求的认知在推动基于团结的行动中的作用。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Jan;64(1):e12855. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12855.
2
Jewish Americans' identity salience and effects on attitudes toward diversity.美籍犹太人的身份凸显及其对多元化态度的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 17;14(1):21676. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72753-w.
3
When People Do Allyship: A Typology of Allyship Action.当人们践行同盟关系时:同盟行为的类型学
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2025 Feb;29(1):3-31. doi: 10.1177/10888683241232732. Epub 2024 Mar 9.
4
Support for Social Change Among Members of Advantaged Groups: The Role of a Dual Identity Representation and Accepting Intergroup Contact.优势群体成员的社会变革支持:双重身份表征和接纳群体间接触的作用。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2023 Jul;49(7):1000-1013. doi: 10.1177/01461672221086380. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
5
Moved by Social Justice: The Role of Kama Muta in Collective Action Toward Racial Equality.受社会正义推动:卡玛·穆塔在争取种族平等的集体行动中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 1;13:780615. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.780615. eCollection 2022.
6
Building Social Cohesion Through Intergroup Contact: Evaluation of a Large-Scale Intervention to Improve Intergroup Relations Among Adolescents.通过群体间接触建立社会凝聚力:一项改善青少年群体间关系的大规模干预措施评估
J Youth Adolesc. 2021 Jun;50(6):1049-1067. doi: 10.1007/s10964-021-01400-8. Epub 2021 Feb 18.