Craig Maureen A, Badaan Vivienne, Brown Riana M
Department of Psychology, New York University, United States.
Department of Psychology, New York University, United States.
Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Oct;35:41-48. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.002. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
In a connected and politically engaged world, it is essential to understand how, why, and when people from diverse backgrounds may support social action. Integrating findings from the collective action, solidarity, and allyship literatures, we present working models of how the lenses through which individuals possessing different group memberships may psychologically identify (as part of the targeted group, an inclusive stigmatized identity, or the societally dominant group) and perceive injustice (as exclusively affecting the targeted group, inclusively affecting the target group and one's ingroup, or perceiving ingroup privileges) may shape social change efforts. We highlight disparate effects of positive (and negative) contact between groups on the mobilization of socially dominant and stigmatized groups that may provide challenges to diverse coalitions seeking social change.
在一个相互关联且政治参与度高的世界里,理解来自不同背景的人们如何、为何以及何时可能支持社会行动至关重要。整合集体行动、团结和盟友关系文献的研究结果,我们提出了一些工作模型,说明拥有不同群体成员身份的个体如何在心理上认同(作为目标群体的一部分、具有包容性的污名化身份或社会主导群体)以及如何看待不公正(仅影响目标群体、同时影响目标群体和自己的内群体、或察觉到内群体特权),这可能会塑造社会变革努力。我们强调了群体之间积极(和消极)接触对社会主导群体和污名化群体动员的不同影响,这可能给寻求社会变革的多元联盟带来挑战。