Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Assisted Reproductive Technology Centre, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Urology. 2020 Jul;141:82-88. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.03.043. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
To evaluate semen characteristics and reproductive outcomes after assisted ejaculation methods with fresh in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles in patients suffering from spinal cord injury (SCI), compared to controls, affected by idiopathic male infertility (non-SCI group).
SCI patients first underwent penile vibratory stimulation. Men "non-responders" to penile vibratory stimulation underwent electroejaculation. Third, testicular sperm aspiration was proposed.
This retrospective monocenter case-control study included 193 couples: 53 couples in SCI group and 140 couples in non-SCI group. Overall, 210 fresh in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles were performed. Median semen volume of SCI was significantly lower, compared to non-SCI (1.5 mL vs 3.1 mL; P < .01). Median sperm concentration/mL and total sperm count was considerably higher in SCI. Mean sperm progressive motility was significantly lower in SCI (5.0% vs 35.0%; P < .01). Normal fertilization rate was significantly lower in SCI (46.0% vs 71.0%; P < .01). Total fertilization rate was 50.0% and 75%, respectively, in SCI and non-SCI groups. A trend toward higher pregnancy rates per cycle was found in non-SCI (31.4% vs 21.4%), or in the live birth rate, which was 27.1% and 20.0%, respectively. No significant differences were found in pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates per cycle, between the 2 groups.
The assisted ejaculation methods in SCI proved to be efficacious and safe to obtain viable sperm for assisted reproductive technologies. Overall, pregnancy and live birth rates were similar to non-SCI patients. Thus, SCI men have the same opportunity to father biological children, compared to men without SCI.
评估脊髓损伤(SCI)患者与特发性男性不育(非 SCI 组)患者相比,采用新鲜体外受精/胞浆内精子注射(IVF/ICSI)周期的辅助射精方法后的精液特征和生殖结局。
SCI 患者首先接受阴茎振动刺激。对阴茎振动刺激无反应的男性进行电刺激射精。然后,建议进行睾丸精子抽吸。
这项回顾性单中心病例对照研究纳入了 193 对夫妇:53 对 SCI 组和 140 对非 SCI 组。总共进行了 210 个新鲜 IVF/ICSI 周期。SCI 的精液量中位数明显低于非 SCI(1.5 毫升对 3.1 毫升;P <.01)。SCI 的精子浓度/ml 和总精子计数显著更高。SCI 的精子前向运动平均百分比明显较低(5.0%对 35.0%;P <.01)。SCI 的正常受精率明显较低(46.0%对 71.0%;P <.01)。SCI 和非 SCI 组的总受精率分别为 50.0%和 75.0%。非 SCI 组的周期妊娠率呈上升趋势(31.4%对 21.4%),活产率分别为 27.1%和 20.0%。两组间的周期妊娠、流产和活产率无显著差异。
辅助射精方法在 SCI 中被证明是有效的和安全的,可以获得用于辅助生殖技术的可行精子。总体而言,妊娠和活产率与非 SCI 患者相似。因此,与没有 SCI 的男性相比,SCI 男性有同样的机会生育亲生子女。