SunYat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, People's Republic of China.
Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, 529000, People's Republic of China.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Sep;140(9):1221-1230. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03428-0. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
Most studies have concentrated on the changes in contact pressure and area on the tibiofemoral joint. This study compared the contact mechanics underneath the medial meniscus of a repaired vertical longitudinal tear with that of the intact or the torn ones.
In this controlled laboratory study, a 1000 N compressive axial load was applied to eight fresh-frozen cadaveric knees at four flexion angles and four loading conditions using a custom testing apparatus attached to a material testing machine. Intact knees, knees with a medial meniscus vertical longitudinal tear, and knees after meniscal repair were tested. The peak contact pressure and area underneath the meniscus were measured using Fuji pressure-sensitive film.
A medial meniscus vertical longitudinal tear significantly increased the contact pressure and decreased contact area underneath the meniscus compared with those at the intact meniscus under all tested biomechanical conditions, and repair of the tear can restore the contact pressure and area in most conditions. While the repaired group showed a significantly higher or similar contact pressure compared with the tear group at 90° neutral knee position and at 60°, 90° 5 N·m-external rotation and 134 N-anterior tibial translation, and 5 N·m-internal rotation at all flexion angles. The contact area corresponding to the aberrant result of the contact pressure in the repaired group was lower than in the intact meniscus group.
The contact mechanics underneath the meniscus of the repaired medial meniscus vertical longitudinal tear were significantly improved compared with the corresponding tear conditions in most cases, while the contact pressure and area at some certain status after repair were not significantly different from those of the corresponding tear conditions.
大多数研究都集中在胫骨股骨关节接触压力和面积的变化上。本研究比较了修复的垂直纵向撕裂内侧半月板下的接触力学与完整或撕裂半月板下的接触力学。
在这项对照实验室研究中,使用连接到材料试验机的定制测试设备,在四个弯曲角度和四个加载条件下,将 1000N 压缩轴向载荷施加到八个新鲜冷冻的尸体膝关节上。测试了完整的膝关节、有内侧半月板垂直纵向撕裂的膝关节和半月板修复后的膝关节。使用富士压敏胶片测量半月板下的峰值接触压力和面积。
与完整半月板相比,内侧半月板垂直纵向撕裂在所有测试生物力学条件下均显著增加了半月板下的接触压力并减小了接触面积,而撕裂的修复可以在大多数条件下恢复接触压力和面积。在 90°中立膝关节位置和 60°、90°5N·m-外旋和 134N-胫骨前平移以及所有弯曲角度的 5N·m-内旋时,修复组的接触压力明显高于或与撕裂组相似,但接触面积与修复组异常的接触压力结果相对应,低于完整半月板组。
与大多数情况下相应的撕裂条件相比,修复的内侧半月板垂直纵向撕裂的半月板下接触力学有显著改善,而修复后的某些特定状态下的接触压力和面积与相应的撕裂条件没有显著差异。