• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助与胸腹腔镜联合辅助食管癌根治术的短期和长期疗效比较

[Comparison of short-term and long-term efficacy between robot-assisted and thoracoscopy-laparoscopy-assisted radical esophageal cancer surgery].

作者信息

He Z F, Zheng T L, Liu D L, Yang Y, Zhu D Y, Wu K, Wang L P, Zhao S

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China.

Medical School of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 25;23(4):390-395. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20190327-00120.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20190327-00120
PMID:32306608
Abstract

To explore the safety and short-term and long-term efficacy of robot-assisted radical esophageal cancer surgery. A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted. Patients who were preoperatively diagnosed as stage 0-IIIB esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and suitable for minimally invasive surgery in our hospital from January 1, 2014 to June 30, 2018 were prospectively enrolled. Those of age ≥75 years having received preoperative neoadjuvant therapy, contradicted to anesthesia or operation due to severe complications, with history of thoracotomy or laparotomy, with concurrent malignant tumors, without complete informations or refusing to participate in this study were excluded. Participants were randomly divided into the thoracoscopy-laparoscopy group and the robot group using a random number table in ratio of 1:1. Preoperative clinicopathological data, surgical data and postoperative outcomes were recorded. The patients were followed up mainly by telephone. Follow-up endpoint was recurrence of esophageal cancer and death. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival rate. The survival difference between the two groups was analyzed using the log-rank test. According to above criteria, a total of 192 esophageal cancer patients were enrolled finally, including 144 males and 48 females with mean age of (61.9±8.6) years. The robot group had 94 cases, including 72 males and 22 females with mean age of (61.3±8.2) years, and the thoracoscopy-laparoscopy group had 98 cases, including 72 males and 26 females with mean age of (62.4±9.1) years. There were no significant differences in baseline data between the two groups (all >0.05). Operation was abandoned in one case in each group due to extensive pleural cavity metastasis and one case in each group was converted to thoracotomy. The success rate of operation was 97.9% (92/94) in the robot group and 98.0% (96/98) in the thoracoscopy-laparoscopy group (χ(2)=0.002, =0.996). The number of lymph nodes dissected in the robot group was significantly higher than that in the thoracoscopy-laparoscopy group (29.2±12.5 vs. 22.8±13.3, =3.433, =0.001), while there were no significant differences in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, R0 resection rate, postoperative 30-day mortality, postoperative hospital stay, ICU stay, time to withdrawal of chest drainage tube, ICU readmission, and postoperative morbidity of complications between the two groups (all >0.05). The median follow-up time was 21 (3 to 57) months. During the follow-up, 3 cases and 4 cases were lost, and 2 cases and 3 cases died of other diseases in the robot group and in the thoracoscopy-laparoscopy group respectively. Recurrence occurred in 39 cases during follow-up, including 14 recurrences in the robotic group with 1- and 3-year recurrence-free survival rates of 92.4% and 87.6% respectively and the median recurrence time of 15 (9 to 42) months. There were 25 recurrences in the thoracoscopy-laparoscopy group with 1- and 3-year recurrence-free survival rates of 81.7% and 67.9% respectively and the median recurrence time of 9 (3 to 42) months. There was significant difference in recurrence-free survival between the two groups (χ(2)=4.193, =0.041). The robotic surgical system has good oncology effect and surgical safety in the radical operation of esophageal cancer, which deserves further research and promotion.

摘要

探讨机器人辅助根治性食管癌手术的安全性及短期和长期疗效。进行了一项前瞻性随机对照试验。前瞻性纳入2014年1月1日至2018年6月30日在我院术前诊断为0-IIIB期食管鳞状细胞癌且适合微创手术的患者。排除年龄≥75岁、接受过术前新辅助治疗、因严重并发症而麻醉或手术禁忌、有开胸或开腹手术史、合并恶性肿瘤、资料不全或拒绝参加本研究的患者。采用随机数字表法将参与者按1:1的比例随机分为胸腔镜-腹腔镜组和机器人组。记录术前临床病理资料、手术资料及术后结局。主要通过电话对患者进行随访。随访终点为食管癌复发和死亡。采用Kaplan-Meier法估计生存率。采用log-rank检验分析两组间的生存差异。根据上述标准,最终共纳入192例食管癌患者,其中男性144例,女性48例,平均年龄(61.9±8.6)岁。机器人组94例,其中男性72例,女性22例,平均年龄(61.3±8.2)岁;胸腔镜-腹腔镜组98例,其中男性72例,女性26例,平均年龄(62.4±9.1)岁。两组基线资料比较差异无统计学意义(均>0.05)。两组各有1例因广泛胸腔转移放弃手术,两组各有1例中转开胸。机器人组手术成功率为97.9%(92/94),胸腔镜-腹腔镜组为98.0%(96/98)(χ²=0.002,P=0.996)。机器人组清扫淋巴结数目显著高于胸腔镜-腹腔镜组(29.2±12.5 vs. 22.8±13.3,t=3.433,P=0.001),而两组手术时间、术中出血量、R0切除率、术后30天死亡率、术后住院时间、ICU住院时间、胸腔引流管拔除时间、ICU再入院率及术后并发症发生率比较差异均无统计学意义(均>0.05)。中位随访时间为21(3至57)个月。随访期间,机器人组和胸腔镜-腹腔镜组分别失访3例和4例,分别有2例和3例死于其他疾病。随访期间39例复发,其中机器人组14例复发,1年和3年无复发生存率分别为92.4%和87.6%,中位复发时间为15(9至42)个月。胸腔镜-腹腔镜组25例复发,1年和3年无复发生存率分别为81.7%和67.9%,中位复发时间为9(3至42)个月。两组无复发生存率比较差异有统计学意义(χ²=4.193,P=0.041)。机器人手术系统在食管癌根治手术中具有良好的肿瘤学效果和手术安全性,值得进一步研究和推广。

相似文献

1
[Comparison of short-term and long-term efficacy between robot-assisted and thoracoscopy-laparoscopy-assisted radical esophageal cancer surgery].机器人辅助与胸腹腔镜联合辅助食管癌根治术的短期和长期疗效比较
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 25;23(4):390-395. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20190327-00120.
2
[Effects of robotic and laparoscopic-assisted surgery on lymph node dissection and short-term outcomes in patients with Siewert II adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction].[机器人手术与腹腔镜辅助手术对食管胃交界部Siewert II型腺癌患者淋巴结清扫及短期预后的影响]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Feb 25;22(2):156-163.
3
[Efficacy comparison between robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial].机器人辅助与腹腔镜手术治疗中低位直肠癌的疗效比较:一项前瞻性随机对照试验
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 25;23(4):377-383. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20190401-00135.
4
Oncologic Long-Term Results of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Thoraco-Laparoscopic Esophagectomy with Two-Field Lymphadenectomy for Esophageal Cancer.机器人辅助微创胸腹腔镜联合食管癌二野淋巴结清扫术的肿瘤学长期疗效
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;22 Suppl 3:S1350-6. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4544-x. Epub 2015 May 29.
5
[Grading evaluation of operative complications and analysis of related risk factors in patients with stage Ⅰ endometrial cancer treated by robotic-assisted and traditional laparoscopic surgery].[机器人辅助手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗Ⅰ期子宫内膜癌患者手术并发症的分级评估及相关危险因素分析]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Feb 25;55(2):112-119. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2020.02.010.
6
Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial, robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy).机器人辅助食管切除术(RAE)与传统微创食管切除术(MIE)治疗可切除的食管鳞癌:一项多中心前瞻性随机对照试验的方案(RAMIE 试验,机器人辅助微创食管切除术)。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Jun 21;19(1):608. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5799-6.
7
Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: laparoscopic transhiatal procedure or thoracoscopy in prone position followed by laparoscopy?癌症的微创食管切除术:腹腔镜经裂孔手术还是俯卧位胸腔镜手术继以腹腔镜手术?
Surg Endosc. 2008 Apr;22(4):1060-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9697-7. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
8
[Comparison of short-term efficacy between robotic and 3D laparoscopic-assisted D2 radical distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer].机器人与3D腹腔镜辅助胃癌D2根治性远端胃切除术的短期疗效比较
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 25;23(4):350-356. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20200224-00085.
9
Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes.机器人辅助微创食管切除术在治疗食管鳞癌方面真的比电视辅助微创食管切除术具有淋巴结清扫优势吗?基于短期结果的倾向评分匹配分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2019 Jul 1;32(7). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy110.
10
Long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.机器人辅助与胸腔镜辅助 McKeown 食管切除术治疗食管癌的长期疗效比较:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Dis Esophagus. 2021 Sep 9;34(9). doi: 10.1093/dote/doaa114.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Is Safe and Cost Equivalent Compared to Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in a Tertiary Referral Center.在三级转诊中心,与微创食管切除术相比,机器人辅助的Ivor Lewis食管切除术安全且成本相当。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Dec 25;16(1):112. doi: 10.3390/cancers16010112.
2
Pathologic Complete Response Following Esophagectomy: Lymph Nodes Matter!食管癌切除术后的病理完全缓解:淋巴结很重要!
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Apr 24. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-11712-z.
3
Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
机器人辅助微创食管切除术与电视辅助微创食管切除术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Transl Cancer Res. 2021 Nov;10(11):4601-4616. doi: 10.21037/tcr-21-1482.
4
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted, Video-Assisted, and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.机器人辅助、视频辅助与开放性食管癌切除术临床疗效的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2129228. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.29228.
5
Safety of subxiphoid uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for anterior mediastinal tumour in obese patients.肥胖患者剑突下单孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术治疗前纵隔肿瘤的安全性
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2021 Jun;16(2):377-381. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2020.100879. Epub 2020 Nov 13.