Adana Health Practice and Research Center, University of Health Science, Adana, Turkey.
Acta Cardiol. 2021 Jun;76(4):402-409. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2020.1747177. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
The prognostic value of objective nutritional indexes has been demonstrated in many diseases. This study evaluated the prognostic value of these indexes in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVI).
Totally, 119 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI between January 2016 and December 2018 were evaluated. All patients were followed-up for one year. Objective nutritional index (geriatric nutritional risk index [GNRI], prognostic nutritional index [PNI]) and controlling nutritional status [CONUT]) scores were calculated before TAVI.
Mean age of the study population was 77.1 ± 7.8 years (59.7% female). During one-year follow-up, 31 (26.1%) deaths were observed. In a Kaplan-Meier analysis, mortality rates were significantly increased in patients with lower GNRI and PNI and higher CONUT scores (50.01% vs. 4.4%; < .001, 48.1% vs. 15.2%; < .001, 57.5% vs. 12.8%; < .001, respectively). Pairwise comparisons of the ROC curves demonstrated that the GNRI score was a significantly better predictor of mortality than the PNI and CONUT scores (area under curve; 0.898, 0.664, and 0.722, respectively, for both; < .001). According to Cox proportional hazard analyses, the GNRI (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.898) and STS (HR: 1.359) score were independently associated with increased 1-year mortality (for all < .05).
The GNRI, PNI and CONUT scores were associated with 1-year all-cause mortality in patients who underwent TAVI. The predictive value of the GNRI score was significantly better than the PNI or CONUT scores. Assessment of the GNRI should be considered before TAVI.
客观营养指标的预后价值已在许多疾病中得到证实。本研究评估了这些指标在接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI)的患者中的预后价值。
共评估了 2016 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间接受 TAVI 的 119 例连续患者。所有患者均随访 1 年。在 TAVI 前计算了客观营养指标(老年营养风险指数[GNRI]、预后营养指数[PNI])和控制营养状况[CONUT])评分。
研究人群的平均年龄为 77.1±7.8 岁(59.7%为女性)。在 1 年的随访中,观察到 31 例(26.1%)死亡。在 Kaplan-Meier 分析中,GNRI 和 PNI 较低以及 CONUT 评分较高的患者死亡率明显升高(50.01% vs. 4.4%; < .001,48.1% vs. 15.2%; < .001,57.5% vs. 12.8%; < .001,分别)。ROC 曲线的两两比较表明,GNRI 评分是死亡率的预测指标明显优于 PNI 和 CONUT 评分(曲线下面积;0.898、0.664 和 0.722,均为 < .001)。根据 Cox 比例风险分析,GNRI(危险比[HR]:0.898)和 STS(HR:1.359)评分与 1 年全因死亡率增加独立相关(均为 < .05)。
GNRI、PNI 和 CONUT 评分与接受 TAVI 的患者 1 年内全因死亡率相关。GNRI 评分的预测价值明显优于 PNI 或 CONUT 评分。在进行 TAVI 之前,应考虑评估 GNRI。