• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么人们会拨打危机热线?确定呈现原因的分类,并发现这些原因之间的关联。

Why do people call crisis helplines? Identifying taxonomies of presenting reasons and discovering associations between these reasons.

机构信息

Ulster University at Jordanstown, UK.

Ulster University at Coleraine, UK.

出版信息

Health Informatics J. 2020 Dec;26(4):2597-2613. doi: 10.1177/1460458220913429. Epub 2020 Apr 18.

DOI:10.1177/1460458220913429
PMID:32306837
Abstract

The objective of this study is to identify the most common reasons for contacting a crisis helpline through analysing a large call log data set. Two taxonomies were identified within the call log data from a Northern Ireland telephone crisis helpline (Lifeline), categorising the cited reason for each call. One taxonomy categorised the reasons at a fine granular level; the other taxonomy used the relatively coarser International Classification of Diseases-10. Exploratory data analytic techniques were applied to discover insights into why individuals contact crisis helplines. Risk ratings of calls were also compared to assess the associations between presenting issue and of risk of suicide as assessed. Reasons for contacting the service were assessed across geolocations. Association rule mining was used to identify associations between the presenting reasons for client's calls. Results demonstrate that both taxonomies show that calls with reasons relating to suicide are the most common reasons for contacting Lifeline and were a prominent feature of the discovered association rules. There were significant differences between reasons in both taxonomies concerning risk ratings. Reasons for calling helplines that are associated with higher risk ratings include those calling with a personality disorder, mental disorders, delusional disorders and drugs (legal). In conclusion, employing two differing taxonomy approaches to analyse call log data reveals the prevalence of main presenting reasons for contacting a crisis helpline. The association rule mining using each taxonomy provided insights into the associations between presenting reasons. Practical and research applications are discussed.

摘要

本研究旨在通过分析大量的呼叫记录数据集,确定拨打危机热线的最常见原因。在北爱尔兰的一个电话危机热线(生命线)的呼叫记录数据中确定了两个分类法,对每个呼叫引用的原因进行分类。一个分类法对原因进行了更细粒度的分类;另一个分类法使用相对较粗的国际疾病分类-10。应用探索性数据分析技术来发现为什么个人会联系危机热线。还比较了呼叫的风险评分,以评估所提出的问题与自杀风险评估之间的关联。评估了在不同地理位置下服务的联系原因。关联规则挖掘用于识别客户来电的呈现原因之间的关联。结果表明,这两个分类法都表明,与自杀有关的原因的呼叫是拨打生命线的最常见原因,也是发现的关联规则的突出特征。在风险评分方面,两个分类法中的原因存在显著差异。与更高风险评分相关的呼叫原因包括那些有性格障碍、精神障碍、妄想障碍和药物(合法)的呼叫者。总之,采用两种不同的分类法分析呼叫记录数据揭示了联系危机热线的主要呈现原因的普遍性。使用每个分类法的关联规则挖掘提供了关于呈现原因之间关联的见解。讨论了实际和研究应用。

相似文献

1
Why do people call crisis helplines? Identifying taxonomies of presenting reasons and discovering associations between these reasons.为什么人们会拨打危机热线?确定呈现原因的分类,并发现这些原因之间的关联。
Health Informatics J. 2020 Dec;26(4):2597-2613. doi: 10.1177/1460458220913429. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
2
How do frequent users of crisis helplines differ from other users regarding their reasons for calling? Results from a survey with callers to Lifeline, Australia's national crisis helpline service.与其他拨打者相比,危机求助热线的频繁使用者在拨打原因上有何不同?对澳大利亚国家危机求助热线服务“生命线”的拨打者进行的一项调查结果。
Health Soc Care Community. 2017 May;25(3):1041-1049. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12404. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
3
Talk Time Differences Between Interregional and Intraregional Calls to a Crisis Helpline: Statistical Analysis.区域间和区域内电话通话时间差异:统计分析
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Sep 19;11:e58162. doi: 10.2196/58162.
4
The experiences of frequent users of crisis helplines: A qualitative interview study.危机热线频繁使用者的经历:一项定性访谈研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Nov;99(11):1901-1906. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.06.030. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
5
"Put your personality into the call": A qualitative interview study illuminating strategies for improving men's engagement on crisis helplines.“将个性融入来电中”:一项定性访谈研究,阐明了提高男性危机热线参与度的策略。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 27;24(1):1720. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19242-x.
6
Frequent callers to crisis helplines: who are they and why do they call?危机热线的频繁来电者:他们是谁,为何致电?
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;49(1):54-64. doi: 10.1177/0004867414541154. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
7
Assessing a Suicide Prevention Helpline's Impact on Caller Crisis Level and Suicidality.评估自杀预防热线对来电者危机程度和自杀倾向的影响。
Arch Suicide Res. 2024 Aug 23:1-16. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2394666.
8
Predicting Caller Type From a Mental Health and Well-Being Helpline: Analysis of Call Log Data.从心理健康与幸福热线预测来电者类型:通话记录数据分析
JMIR Ment Health. 2018 Jun 11;5(2):e47. doi: 10.2196/mental.9946.
9
Systematic Review of Research and Interventions With Frequent Callers to Suicide Prevention Helplines and Crisis Centers.自杀预防热线和危机中心频繁来电者的研究和干预措施的系统评价。
Crisis. 2023 Mar;44(2):154-167. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000838. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
10
"I Called When I Was at My Lowest": Australian Men's Experiences of Crisis Helplines.“我在最低谷时打电话求助”:澳大利亚男性对危机热线的体验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 27;19(15):9143. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159143.

引用本文的文献

1
How Demanding Is Volunteer Work at a Crisis Line? An Assessment of Work- and Organization-Related Demands and the Relation With Distress and Intention to Leave.危机热线的志愿者工作要求有多高?对工作和组织相关要求的评估,以及与困扰和离职意向的关系。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jul 15;9:699116. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.699116. eCollection 2021.
2
Behavior of Callers to a Crisis Helpline Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Quantitative Data Analysis.COVID-19大流行之前及期间拨打危机热线者的行为:定量数据分析
JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Nov 6;7(11):e22984. doi: 10.2196/22984.