• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗专业人员在胰腺癌治疗中整合共享决策的障碍和促进因素:网络方法。

Barriers and facilitators of healthcare professionals in integrating shared decision-making in pancreatic cancer treatment: A network approach.

机构信息

Radboudumc, IQ Health, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Radboudumc, Oncology, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2024 Oct;13(19):e70218. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70218.

DOI:10.1002/cam4.70218
PMID:39400466
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11472399/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Shared decision-making (SDM) is crucial in pancreatic cancer treatment due to its choice-sensitive nature and limited prognosis. Treatment of pancreatic cancer is organized in a network approach. Several obstacles exist on different levels-patient, healthcare professional, organizational, societal-that impede integration of SDM. This study aims to identify barriers and facilitators to SDM implementation within a comprehensive cancer network.

METHODS

A qualitative research design was applied, involving interviews and focus groups on barriers and facilitators with healthcare professionals involved in the implementation of SDM. In one comprehensive cancer network in the Netherlands, including seven hospitals, a project was initiated with the goal of empowering patients and healthcare professionals in SDM throughout primary, secondary and tertiary healthcare settings. A total of 17 participants were assessed. Directed qualitative content analysis was performed by two researchers.

RESULTS

Main findings revealed barriers such as time constraints, lack of priority of physicians, little involvement of general practitioners, and insufficient social context of patients in referrals, alongside facilitators including learning communities with practical SDM examples, metro mapping, involvement of case manager in implementation and patient empowerment strategies.

CONCLUSION

Addressing cultural, systemic barriers and developing innovative strategies are of importance to enhance SDM in pancreatic cancer treatment in a network approach. This study provides understanding of SDM implementation in complex healthcare settings and offers valuable guidance for future interventions seeking to improve decision-making processes in pancreatic cancer treatment and beyond.

摘要

目的

由于胰腺癌治疗的选择敏感性和预后有限,共享决策(SDM)在胰腺癌治疗中至关重要。胰腺癌的治疗采用网络方法进行组织。在不同层面——患者、医疗保健专业人员、组织、社会——都存在一些障碍,这些障碍阻碍了 SDM 的整合。本研究旨在确定在综合癌症网络中实施 SDM 的障碍和促进因素。

方法

采用定性研究设计,对参与 SDM 实施的医疗保健专业人员进行了有关障碍和促进因素的访谈和焦点小组。在荷兰的一个综合癌症网络中,包括 7 家医院,启动了一个项目,旨在通过在初级、二级和三级医疗保健环境中为患者和医疗保健专业人员提供权力,来实现 SDM。共评估了 17 名参与者。两名研究人员进行了定向定性内容分析。

结果

主要发现揭示了一些障碍,如时间限制、医生缺乏优先级、全科医生参与度低、以及患者在转诊中社会背景不足,同时还存在一些促进因素,如具有实际 SDM 示例的学习社区、地铁映射、实施过程中案例管理员的参与以及患者赋权策略。

结论

解决文化、系统障碍和开发创新策略对于在网络方法中增强胰腺癌治疗中的 SDM 非常重要。本研究提供了对复杂医疗保健环境中 SDM 实施的理解,并为未来旨在改善胰腺癌治疗和其他领域决策过程的干预措施提供了有价值的指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/342d/11472399/974e3d3223ec/CAM4-13-e70218-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/342d/11472399/974e3d3223ec/CAM4-13-e70218-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/342d/11472399/974e3d3223ec/CAM4-13-e70218-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Barriers and facilitators of healthcare professionals in integrating shared decision-making in pancreatic cancer treatment: A network approach.医疗专业人员在胰腺癌治疗中整合共享决策的障碍和促进因素:网络方法。
Cancer Med. 2024 Oct;13(19):e70218. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70218.
2
Barriers and facilitators to implement shared decision making in multidisciplinary sciatica care: a qualitative study.多学科坐骨神经痛治疗中实施共享决策的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
Implement Sci. 2013 Aug 23;8:95. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-95.
3
Physician-identified barriers to and facilitators of shared decision-making in the Emergency Department: an exploratory analysis.急诊医师识别的共享决策障碍和促进因素:探索性分析。
Emerg Med J. 2019 Jun;36(6):346-354. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2018-208242. Epub 2019 May 16.
4
Shared decision-making in dementia care planning: barriers and facilitators in two European countries.痴呆症护理规划中的共同决策:两个欧洲国家的障碍与促进因素
Aging Ment Health. 2017 Jan;21(1):31-39. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2016.1255715. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
5
"We will be the ones bearing the consequences": A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in hospital-based maternity care.“我们将是承担后果的人”:一项关于医院产科护理中共同决策的障碍与促进因素的定性研究
Birth. 2024 Sep;51(3):581-594. doi: 10.1111/birt.12812. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
6
Post-training Shared Decision Making Barriers and Facilitators for Pediatric Healthcare Providers: A Mixed-Methods Study.培训后儿科医疗保健提供者共享决策的障碍和促进因素:混合方法研究。
Acad Pediatr. 2019 Jan-Feb;19(1):118-129. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2018.05.010. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
7
Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in hospitals from policy to practice: a systematic review.医院中从政策到实践的共享决策的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2021 Jul 31;16(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01142-y.
8
Barriers and facilitators for shared decision-making in oncology inpatient practice: an explorative study of the healthcare providers' perspective.肿瘤住院实践中共同决策的障碍和促进因素:医疗保健提供者视角的探索性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 May;30(5):3925-3931. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-06820-1. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
9
Shared decision-making needs, barriers, and facilitators of patients with newly diagnosed advanced cancer in the hospital: a multi-level, mixed-methods study.新诊断为晚期癌症的住院患者的共享决策需求、障碍和促进因素:一项多层次混合方法研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Apr 29;32(5):315. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08515-1.
10
Experiences of shared decision-making in community rehabilitation: a focused ethnography.社区康复中共同决策的经验:聚焦民族志研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 19;20(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05223-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Design and Validation of a Questionnaire to Measure Interprofessional Collaborative Practice for Auditing Integrated Hospital Care: Empirical Research.用于审核综合医院护理的跨专业协作实践测量问卷的设计与验证:实证研究
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2024 Jul 1;44(3):171-179. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000544. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
2
Shared decision making with Oncologists and Palliative care specialists (SOP) model help advanced pancreatic cancer patients reaching goal concordant care: A prospective cohort study.与肿瘤专家和姑息治疗专家共同决策 (SOP) 模式有助于晚期胰腺癌患者实现目标一致的治疗:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Cancer Med. 2023 Oct;12(19):20119-20128. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6590. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
3
Major influencing factors on routine implementation of shared decision-making in cancer care: qualitative process evaluation of a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial.
影响癌症护理中常规实施共享决策的主要因素:一项递进式整群随机试验的定性过程评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 8;23(1):840. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09778-w.
4
Metro Mapping: development of an innovative methodology to co-design care paths to support shared decision making in oncology.地铁式规划:开发一种创新方法以共同设计护理路径,支持肿瘤学中的共同决策。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023 Oct;28(5):291-294. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112168. Epub 2023 May 26.
5
"SDM:HOSP"- a generic model for hospital-based implementation of shared decision making.“SDM:HOSP”- 一种基于医院的共享决策制定实施的通用模型。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 24;18(1):e0280547. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280547. eCollection 2023.
6
When attitudes and beliefs get in the way of shared decision-making: A mediation analysis of participation preference.当态度和信念阻碍共同决策时:参与偏好的中介分析。
Health Expect. 2023 Apr;26(2):740-751. doi: 10.1111/hex.13699. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
7
Attitudes Toward Striving for Quality and Length of Life Among Patients With Advanced Cancer and a Poor Prognosis.晚期癌症预后不良患者对追求生活质量和寿命的态度。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Nov;18(11):e1818-e1830. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00185. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
8
Roles of general practitioners in shared decision-making for patients with cancer: A qualitative study.全科医生在癌症患者共同决策中的作用:一项定性研究。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Jul;31(4):e13594. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13594. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
9
Evaluation of a program for routine implementation of shared decision-making in cancer care: results of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.评价癌症护理中常规实施共享决策的方案:一项阶梯式楔形集群随机试验的结果。
Implement Sci. 2021 Dec 29;16(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01174-4.
10
Shared decision making in cancer treatment: A Dutch national survey on patients' preferences and perceptions.癌症治疗中的共同决策:荷兰全国范围内关于患者偏好和认知的调查。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Jan;31(1):e13534. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13534. Epub 2021 Nov 2.