• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后常规入住 24 小时冠心病监护病房对预后的影响。

Impact of Routine 24 Hour Coronary Care Unit Stay in Stable Patients After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

机构信息

Cardiac Sciences Program, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Cardiac Sciences Program, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2020 Jun 15;125(12):1770-1773. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.03.020. Epub 2020 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.03.020
PMID:32307092
Abstract

With the routine use of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), the rate of short-term complications is low and the optimal length-of-stay in the coronary care unit (CCU) following reperfusion is unknown. We hypothesized that the rate of complications would not differ between two groups of stable patients admitted to the CCU following primary-PCI for STEMI: (1) those for whom a minimum 24-hour stay was enforced (≥24 hour Standard Stay) and (2) those with no minimum length-of-stay (Physician-guided Stay). Data were collected retrospectively. We performed a regression analysis to determine predictors of the primary endpoint (a composite of in-hospital death, re-infarction and/or re-intervention, heart failure requiring intravenous diuretics, cardiac arrest, central nervous system and/or peripheral embolization, bleeding requiring transfusion, arrhythmia resulting in initiation of a class I or III antiarrhythmic drug, initiation of assisted ventilation, requirement for vasopressors or inotropes, or transfer to intensive care). A total of 242 patients were included in the analysis. The rate of the primary endpoint was 8% in the physician-guided stay group and 16% in the standard ≥24 hour stay group (p = 0.06). The most common complication in both groups was heart failure requiring diuretics (42%), which was predicted by the left ventricular end diastolic pressure on catheterization (area under the Receiver-Operator Curve of 0.75). In conclusion, Patients who are stable following primary PCI for STEMI have a low rate of complications. Stable STEMI patients do not appear to benefit from a mandatory ≥24 hours stay in the CCU.

摘要

随着经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)中的常规应用,短期并发症的发生率较低,再灌注后在冠心病监护病房(CCU)的最佳住院时间尚不清楚。我们假设,在接受直接 PCI 治疗 STEMI 后入住 CCU 的两组稳定患者中,并发症发生率没有差异:(1)强制性 24 小时住院(≥24 小时标准住院);(2)无最短住院时间(医生指导住院)。数据是回顾性收集的。我们进行了回归分析,以确定主要终点(住院期间死亡、再梗死和/或再介入、需要静脉利尿剂的心力衰竭、心脏骤停、中枢神经系统和/或外周栓塞、需要输血的出血、导致使用 I 类或 III 类抗心律失常药物的心律失常、开始辅助通气、需要加压素或正性肌力药物或转至重症监护病房)的预测因素。共有 242 例患者纳入分析。在医生指导的住院组中,主要终点的发生率为 8%,在标准的≥24 小时住院组中为 16%(p=0.06)。在这两组中最常见的并发症是需要利尿剂的心力衰竭(42%),这可以通过导管插入术的左心室舒张末期压来预测(接收者操作特征曲线下面积为 0.75)。总之,直接 PCI 治疗 STEMI 后稳定的患者并发症发生率较低。稳定的 STEMI 患者似乎不需要强制性在 CCU 住院≥24 小时。

相似文献

1
Impact of Routine 24 Hour Coronary Care Unit Stay in Stable Patients After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后常规入住 24 小时冠心病监护病房对预后的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Jun 15;125(12):1770-1773. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.03.020. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
2
Step-down units are cost-effective alternatives to coronary care units with non-inferior outcomes in the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients after successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention.在成功进行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后,对于ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的管理,降级病房是冠心病监护病房具有成本效益的替代方案,且治疗效果不逊色。
Intern Emerg Med. 2020 Jan;15(1):59-66. doi: 10.1007/s11739-019-02037-z. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
3
Comparison of In-Hospital Mortality, Length of Stay, Postprocedural Complications, and Cost of Single-Vessel Versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Hemodynamically Stable Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (from Nationwide Inpatient Sample [2006 to 2012]).血流动力学稳定的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者单支血管与多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的院内死亡率、住院时间、术后并发症及费用比较(来自全国住院患者样本[2006年至2012年])
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Oct 1;118(7):950-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.06.057. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
4
One-Month Clinical Outcomes of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention at a High-volume Cardiac Tertiary Center: Routine Hours Versus Off-hours.在一家大型心脏三级中心接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的1个月临床结局:常规时间与非工作时间。
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2020 Mar;19(1):33-36. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000195.
5
Efficacy and Safety of a Pharmaco-Invasive Strategy With Half-Dose Alteplase Versus Primary Angioplasty in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: EARLY-MYO Trial (Early Routine Catheterization After Alteplase Fibrinolysis Versus Primary PCI in Acute ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction).半剂量阿替普酶与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死中的疗效和安全性:EARLY-MYO 试验(阿替普酶溶栓后早期常规冠状动脉造影与急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较)。
Circulation. 2017 Oct 17;136(16):1462-1473. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030582. Epub 2017 Aug 27.
6
Value-Based ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Care Using Risk-Guided Triage and Early Discharge.基于价值的ST段抬高型心肌梗死护理:采用风险导向分诊和早期出院
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Apr;11(4):e004553. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004553.
7
Safety of early discharge in low risk patients after acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Open label, randomized trial.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后低风险患者早期出院的安全性。开放标签随机试验。
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2019 Feb;163(1):61-66. doi: 10.5507/bp.2018.041. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
8
Impact of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with successful percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents: Comparison between STEMI and NSTEMI.血管紧张素转化酶抑制剂对成功行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗伴药物洗脱支架的急性心肌梗死患者长期临床结局的影响:STEMI 与 NSTEMI 比较。
Atherosclerosis. 2019 Jan;280:166-173. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.11.030. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
9
Percutaneous Intervention for Concurrent Chronic Total Occlusions in Patients With STEMI: The EXPLORE Trial.经皮介入治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并慢性完全闭塞病变患者:EXPLORE 试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Oct 11;68(15):1622-1632. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.07.744.
10
Repatriation to referral hospital after reperfusion of STEMI patients transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights of a Canadian regional STEMI care system.接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后再灌注的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者转回转诊医院:加拿大地区ST段抬高型心肌梗死护理系统的见解
Am Heart J. 2016 Jul;177:145-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.04.017. Epub 2016 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Exercise training and experimental myocardial ischemia and reperfusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.运动训练与实验性心肌缺血及再灌注:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2023 Apr 29;46:101214. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2023.101214. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Stable Patients With STEMI Rarely Require Intensive-Care-Level Therapy After Primary PCI.ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)稳定患者在直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后很少需要重症监护级别的治疗。
CJC Open. 2022 Jan 11;4(4):390-394. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2021.12.013. eCollection 2022 Apr.