• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在英国,接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 (PCI) 的急性冠状动脉综合征 (ACS) 患者的真实世界出血情况:一项基于人群的队列研究模拟“目标试验”。

Real-world bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and prescribed different combinations of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in England: a population-based cohort study emulating a 'target trial'.

机构信息

Bristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

Bristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Open Heart. 2022 Aug;9(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-001999.

DOI:10.1136/openhrt-2022-001999
PMID:35961692
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9379532/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the incidence and HRs for bleeding for different dual antiplatelet therapies (DAPT) in a real-world population with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in England.

DESIGN

A retrospective, population-based cohort study emulating a target randomised controlled trial (tRCT).

DATA SOURCES

Linked Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES).

SETTING

Primary and secondary care.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients ≥18 years old with ACS undergoing emergency PCI.

INTERVENTIONS

Aspirin and clopidogrel (AC, reference) versus aspirin and prasugrel (AP) or aspirin and ticagrelor (AT); AP evaluated only in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary: any bleeding up to 12 months after the index event (HES- or CPRD- recorded). Secondary: HES-recorded bleeding, CPRD-recorded bleeding, all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, mortality from bleeding, myocardial infarction, stroke, additional coronary intervention and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE).

RESULTS

In ACS, the rates of any bleeding for AC and AT were 89 per 1000 person years and 134 per 1000 person years, respectively. In STEMI, rates for AC, AP and AT were 93 per 1000 person years, 138 per 1000 person years and 143 per 100 person years, respectively. In ACS, compared with AC, AT increased the hazard of any bleeding (HR: 1.47, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.82) but did not reduce MACCE (HR: 1.06, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.27). In STEMI, compared with AC, AP and AT increased the hazard of any bleeding (HR: 1.77, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.59 and HR: 1.50, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.05, respectively) but did not reduce MACCE (HR: 1.10, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.51 and HR: 1.21, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.51, respectively). Non-adherence to the prescribed DAPT regimen was 28% in AC (29% in STEMI only), 31% in AP (STEMI only) and 33% in AT (32% in STEMI only).

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-world population with ACS, DAPT with ticagrelor or prasugrel are associated with increased bleeding compared with DAPT with clopidogrel.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN76607611.

摘要

目的

在英国接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者中,估计不同双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)的出血发生率和 HR。

设计

一项回顾性、基于人群的队列研究,模拟目标随机对照试验(tRCT)。

数据来源

临床实践研究数据链接(CPRD)和医院入院统计(HES)的链接。

设置

初级和二级保健。

参与者

年龄≥18 岁,因 ACS 行紧急 PCI 的患者。

干预措施

阿司匹林加氯吡格雷(AC,参照)与阿司匹林加普拉格雷(AP)或阿司匹林加替格瑞洛(AT);仅在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中评估 AP。

主要观察指标

主要终点:索引事件后 12 个月内的任何出血(HES 或 CPRD 记录)。次要终点:HES 记录的出血、CPRD 记录的出血、全因和心血管死亡率、出血死亡率、心肌梗死、卒中和其他冠状动脉介入治疗以及主要不良心血管和脑血管事件(MACCE)。

结果

在 ACS 中,AC 和 AT 的任何出血率分别为 89/1000 人年和 134/1000 人年。在 STEMI 中,AC、AP 和 AT 的出血率分别为 93/1000 人年、138/1000 人年和 143/100 人年。在 ACS 中,与 AC 相比,AT 增加了任何出血的风险(HR:1.47,95%CI 1.19 至 1.82),但未降低 MACCE(HR:1.06,95%CI 0.89 至 1.27)。在 STEMI 中,与 AC 相比,AP 和 AT 增加了任何出血的风险(HR:1.77,95%CI 1.21 至 2.59 和 HR:1.50,95%CI 1.10 至 2.05),但未降低 MACCE(HR:1.10,95%CI 0.80 至 1.51 和 HR:1.21,95%CI 0.94 至 1.51)。AC 的不依从性处方 DAPT 方案为 28%(仅在 STEMI 中为 29%),AP(仅在 STEMI 中)为 31%,AT(仅在 STEMI 中)为 33%。

结论

在 ACS 真实世界人群中,与氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛或普拉格雷的 DAPT 治疗与出血增加相关。

试验注册

ISRCTN76607611。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc72/9379532/138bae483540/openhrt-2022-001999f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc72/9379532/4d2e73079c12/openhrt-2022-001999f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc72/9379532/2d32056e807b/openhrt-2022-001999f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc72/9379532/bc19a34ca9ce/openhrt-2022-001999f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc72/9379532/138bae483540/openhrt-2022-001999f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc72/9379532/4d2e73079c12/openhrt-2022-001999f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc72/9379532/2d32056e807b/openhrt-2022-001999f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc72/9379532/bc19a34ca9ce/openhrt-2022-001999f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc72/9379532/138bae483540/openhrt-2022-001999f04.jpg

相似文献

1
Real-world bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and prescribed different combinations of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in England: a population-based cohort study emulating a 'target trial'.在英国,接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 (PCI) 的急性冠状动脉综合征 (ACS) 患者的真实世界出血情况:一项基于人群的队列研究模拟“目标试验”。
Open Heart. 2022 Aug;9(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-001999.
2
Bleeding risk in patients prescribed dual antiplatelet therapy and triple therapy after coronary interventions: the ADAPTT retrospective population-based cohort studies.接受冠状动脉介入治疗后接受双联抗血小板治疗和三联治疗的患者的出血风险:ADAPTT 回顾性基于人群的队列研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2023 May;27(8):1-257. doi: 10.3310/MNJY9014.
3
Comprehensive ascertainment of bleeding in patients prescribed different combinations of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and triple therapy (TT) in the UK: study protocol for three population-based cohort studies emulating 'target trials' (the ADAPTT Study).在英国,综合评估不同双联抗血小板治疗 (DAPT) 和三联治疗 (TT) 方案处方患者的出血情况:三个基于人群的队列研究的研究方案,模拟“目标试验”(ADAPTT 研究)。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 4;9(6):e029388. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029388.
4
Long versus short dual antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndrome patients treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor and coronary revascularization: Insights from the RENAMI registry.接受普拉格雷或替格瑞洛治疗的急性冠脉综合征患者中长程与短程双联抗血小板治疗与冠状动脉血运重建:来自 RENAMI 注册研究的结果。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 May;27(7):696-705. doi: 10.1177/2047487319836327. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
5
De-escalation of dual antiplatelet therapy for patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠状动脉综合征患者双联抗血小板治疗的降阶梯治疗:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 May 22;29(3):171-186. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112476.
6
Aspirin-free strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome based on the subtypes of acute coronary syndrome and high bleeding risk: the STOPDAPT-3 trial.基于急性冠状动脉综合征亚型和高出血风险的急性冠状动脉综合征患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时的阿司匹林-free 策略:STOPDAPT-3 试验。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2024 Aug 14;10(5):374-390. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvae009.
7
Comparison of one-month versus twelve-month dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug-eluting stents guided by either intravascular ultrasound or angiography in patients with acute coronary syndrome: rationale and design of prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled IVUS-ACS and ULTIMATE-DAPT trial.比较血管内超声或血管造影指导下急性冠脉综合征患者药物洗脱支架植入术后 1 个月与 12 个月双联抗血小板治疗:前瞻性、多中心、随机、对照 IVUS-ACS 和 ULTIMATE-DAPT 试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2021 Jun;236:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
8
Bleeding risk and P2Y12 inhibitors in all-comer patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: a single-centre cohort study.所有接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的出血风险和 P2Y12 抑制剂:一项单中心队列研究。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2023 Nov 2;9(7):617-626. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvad048.
9
Safety and Efficacy of Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in East Asian Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Treated with Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷用于东亚行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者双联抗血小板治疗的安全性和有效性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Cardiology. 2023;148(4):363-373. doi: 10.1159/000530602. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
10
Fewer gastrointestinal bleeds with ticagrelor and prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome following percutaneous coronary intervention.与氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛和普拉格雷可减少经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠脉综合征患者的胃肠道出血。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Aug;52(4):646-654. doi: 10.1111/apt.15790. Epub 2020 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Decoding Bleeding Risks and Survival in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Antiplatelet Therapy.解读接受抗血小板治疗的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的出血风险和生存率
JACC Asia. 2025 Sep;5(9):1083-1094. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2025.05.017. Epub 2025 Jul 29.
2
Antiplatelet Therapy in Heart Disease.心脏病中的抗血小板治疗
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jun 25;26(6):36522. doi: 10.31083/RCM36522. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Trends in dual antiplatelet therapy regimens and clinical outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents: A multicenter real-world study.

本文引用的文献

1
Invasive versus non-invasive management of older patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (SENIOR-NSTEMI): a cohort study based on routine clinical data.老年非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(SENIOR-NSTEMI)患者的侵入性与非侵入性治疗:基于常规临床数据的队列研究。
Lancet. 2020 Aug 29;396(10251):623-634. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30930-2.
2
Ticagrelor is Not Superior to Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing PCI: A Report from Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry.替格瑞洛在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中并不优于氯吡格雷:来自瑞典冠状动脉造影和血管成形术登记处的报告。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jul 21;9(14):e015990. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015990. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
3
接受药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者双重抗血小板治疗方案及临床结局的趋势:一项多中心真实世界研究
Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2024 Nov 14;11(1):57-68. doi: 10.1002/cdt3.154. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Clopidogrel therapy in acute coronary syndrome: Contemporary issues.急性冠状动脉综合征中的氯吡格雷治疗:当代问题
Indian Heart J. 2025 Jul-Aug;77(4):311-317. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2025.02.002. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
5
Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Reduced-Dose Prasugrel After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Taiwanese Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes.台湾急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后使用低剂量普拉格雷的临床疗效与安全性
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 27;13(23):7221. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237221.
6
Successful Endoscopic Retrograde Appendicitis Therapy Following a Recent ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.近期ST段抬高型心肌梗死后成功的内镜逆行阑尾炎治疗
ACG Case Rep J. 2024 Mar 29;11(4):e01324. doi: 10.14309/crj.0000000000001324. eCollection 2024 Apr.
7
Efficacy and Safety of Thirty-Day Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy Following Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后30天双联抗血小板治疗的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Jan 29;11(2):43. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11020043.
8
Exploring Clinical Trajectories and the Continuum of Care for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome in the United Kingdom: A Thorough Cross-Sectional Analysis.探索英国急性冠状动脉综合征患者的临床轨迹与连续护理:一项全面的横断面分析。
Cureus. 2023 Nov 25;15(11):e49391. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49391. eCollection 2023 Nov.
9
Reporting of Observational Studies Explicitly Aiming to Emulate Randomized Trials: A Systematic Review.旨在模拟随机试验的观察性研究报告:系统评价。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Sep 5;6(9):e2336023. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.36023.
10
De-escalation or abbreviation of dual antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention: a Consensus Statement from an international expert panel on coronary thrombosis.急性冠状动脉综合征和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中双联抗血小板治疗的降级或缩短:来自冠状动脉血栓形成国际专家小组的共识声明。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2023 Dec;20(12):830-844. doi: 10.1038/s41569-023-00901-2. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Oral P2Y Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Network Meta-Analysis of 52 816 Patients From 12 Randomized Trials.
比较口服 P2Y 抑制剂在急性冠状动脉综合征中的疗效和安全性:来自 12 项随机试验的 52816 例患者的网络荟萃分析。
Circulation. 2020 Jul 14;142(2):150-160. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046786. Epub 2020 May 29.
4
Meta-Analysis Comparing P2Y Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndrome.比较急性冠状动脉综合征中 P2Y 抑制剂的荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Jun 15;125(12):1815-1822. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.03.019. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
5
Bleeding After Hospital Discharge Following Acute Coronary Syndrome: Incidence, Types, Timing, and Predictors.急性冠状动脉综合征出院后出血:发生率、类型、时间和预测因素。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Nov 5;8(21):e013679. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013679. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
6
Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes.替格瑞洛或普拉格雷在急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 17;381(16):1524-1534. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1908973. Epub 2019 Sep 1.
7
Comprehensive ascertainment of bleeding in patients prescribed different combinations of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and triple therapy (TT) in the UK: study protocol for three population-based cohort studies emulating 'target trials' (the ADAPTT Study).在英国,综合评估不同双联抗血小板治疗 (DAPT) 和三联治疗 (TT) 方案处方患者的出血情况:三个基于人群的队列研究的研究方案,模拟“目标试验”(ADAPTT 研究)。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 4;9(6):e029388. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029388.
8
Emulating a Novel Clinical Trial Using Existing Observational Data. Predicting Results of the PreVent Study.使用现有观察性数据模拟一项新的临床试验。预测 PreVent 研究的结果。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Aug;16(8):998-1007. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201903-241OC.
9
Comparisons between ticagrelor and clopidogrel following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a comprehensive meta-analysis.急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷的比较:一项全面的荟萃分析。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2019 Feb 20;13:719-730. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S196535. eCollection 2019.
10
Incidence and prognostic impact of post discharge bleeding post acute coronary syndrome within an outpatient setting: a systematic review.急性冠脉综合征出院后出血的发生率和预后影响:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 20;9(2):e023337. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023337.