Department of Radiology, Institut Bergonié, 229 cours de l'Argonne, Bordeaux 33076, France; Department of Radiology, Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris Cité, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France.
Department of Radiology, Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris Cité, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France.
Acad Radiol. 2021 Apr;28(4):481-486. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.03.012. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of applying four levels of manual pressure in Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) of the breast and to assess inter-rater reliability.
Single-center prospective preliminary study including patients receiving ultrasound examination of breast lesions as part of routine clinical practice. SWE was performed on 60 breast masses (26 benign and 34 malignant) in 54 patients by a breast fellowship trained radiologist. Stiffness values were compared between benign and malignant masses at four levels of manual compression: none, mild, moderate, and marked. Accuracy of SWE was assessed using receiving operating characteristics analysis at each level. In 18 patients, a second radiologist repeated the SWE acquisitions to evaluate reproducibility. Reproducibility was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient.
Without compression, we observed no significant difference in stiffness (p > 0.99) between benign and malignant lesions, and SWE demonstrated low accuracy (area under the curve = 0.64). Stiffness was higher in malignant lesions at all levels of compression (p < 0.001). SWE demonstrated good accuracy at all three levels of compression (from area under the curve = 0.71 to 0.84 across Emax and Emean), with high interobserver agreement.
This preliminary study suggests that not using compression during SWE for breast lesion characterization offers suboptimal results. On the contrary, application of compression yields high diagnostic performance with good interobserver agreement and, as such, should be included in routine clinical practice.
研究在剪切波弹性成像(SWE)中应用四级手动压力对乳腺病变的诊断准确性,并评估其观察者间可靠性。
这是一项单中心前瞻性初步研究,纳入了作为常规临床实践一部分接受乳腺病变超声检查的患者。由一名接受过乳腺奖学金培训的放射科医生对 54 名患者的 60 个乳腺肿块(26 个良性和 34 个恶性)进行了 SWE 检查。在无、轻度、中度和明显四级手动压迫下,比较良性和恶性肿块的硬度值。在每个水平上,使用接收者操作特征分析评估 SWE 的准确性。在 18 名患者中,第二名放射科医生重复了 SWE 采集,以评估可重复性。使用组内相关系数评估可重复性。
在无压迫的情况下,我们观察到良性和恶性病变之间的硬度无显著差异(p > 0.99),SWE 的准确性较低(曲线下面积=0.64)。在所有压迫水平下,恶性病变的硬度均较高(p < 0.001)。在所有三级压迫水平下,SWE 均表现出良好的准确性(从 Emax 和 Emean 的曲线下面积=0.71 到 0.84),观察者间具有高度一致性。
这项初步研究表明,在 SWE 对乳腺病变特征描述中不使用压迫会产生不理想的结果。相反,应用压迫可获得较高的诊断性能,观察者间一致性良好,因此应纳入常规临床实践。