Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Roma, Italy.
Radiological Sciences, Radiology Unit, Papardo-Hospital, Messina, Italy, Messina, Italy.
Ultraschall Med. 2021 Oct;42(5):533-540. doi: 10.1055/a-1134-4937. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
To evaluate the diagnostic performance of strain elastography (SE) and 2 D shear wave elastography (SWE) and SE/SWE combination in comparison with conventional multiparametric ultrasound (US) with respect to improving BI-RADS classification results and differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions using a qualitative and quantitative assessment.
In this prospective study, 130 histologically proven breast masses were evaluated with baseline US, color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS), SE and SWE (Toshiba Aplio 500 with a 7-15 MHz wide-band linear transducer). Each lesion was classified according to the BIRADS lexicon by evaluating the size, the B-mode and color Doppler features, the SE qualitative (point color scale) and SE semi-quantitative (strain ratio) methods, and quantitative SWE. Histological results were compared with BIRADS, strain ratio (SR) and shear wave elastography (SWE) all performed by one investigator blinded to the clinical examination and mammographic results at the time of the US examination. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the diagnostic performance of B-mode US, SE, SWE, and their combination.
Histological examination revealed 47 benign and 83 malignant breast lesions. The accuracy of SR was statistically significantly higher than SWE (sensitivity, specificity and AUC were 89.2 %, 76.6 % and 0.83 for SR and 72.3 %, 66.0 % and 0.69 for SWE, respectively, p = 0.003) but not higher than B-mode US (B-mode US sensitivity, specificity and AUC were 85.5 %, 78.8 %, 0.821, respectively, p = 1.000).
Our experience suggests that conventional US in combination with both SE and SWE is a valid tool that can be useful in the clinical setting, can improve BIRADS category assessment and may help in the differentiation of benign from malignant breast lesions, with SE having higher accuracy than SWE.
通过定性和定量评估,比较应变弹性成像(SE)和二维剪切波弹性成像(SWE)以及 SE/SWE 联合与常规多参数超声(US)在提高 BI-RADS 分类结果和鉴别良恶性乳腺病变方面的诊断性能。
在这项前瞻性研究中,对 130 个经组织学证实的乳腺肿块进行了基线超声、彩色多普勒超声(CDUS)、SE 和 SWE(东芝 Aplio 500 配备 7-15 MHz 宽带线性探头)检查。根据 BI-RADS 词汇表,通过评估大小、B 模式和彩色多普勒特征、SE 定性(点彩标度)和 SE 半定量(应变比)方法以及定量 SWE,对每个病变进行分类。将组织学结果与 BIRADS、应变比(SR)和剪切波弹性成像(SWE)进行比较,这些都是由一位在超声检查时对临床检查和乳腺 X 线摄影结果不知情的研究者进行的。计算 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)以评估 B 模式 US、SE、SWE 及其组合的诊断性能。
组织学检查显示 47 个良性和 83 个恶性乳腺病变。SR 的准确性明显高于 SWE(SR 的敏感性、特异性和 AUC 分别为 89.2%、76.6%和 0.83,SWE 的敏感性、特异性和 AUC 分别为 72.3%、66.0%和 0.69,p=0.003),但不如 B 模式 US(B 模式 US 的敏感性、特异性和 AUC 分别为 85.5%、78.8%、0.821,p=1.000)。
我们的经验表明,常规 US 联合 SE 和 SWE 是一种有效的工具,可在临床环境中使用,可提高 BI-RADS 类别评估,并有助于鉴别良恶性乳腺病变,SE 的准确性高于 SWE。