• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多中心分析与 PI-RADS(v2.0)分类 3 病变中检测临床显著前列腺癌相关的临床和 MRI 特征。

Multicenter analysis of clinical and MRI characteristics associated with detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in PI-RADS (v2.0) category 3 lesions.

机构信息

Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.

Department of Urology, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.

出版信息

Urol Oncol. 2020 Jul;38(7):637.e9-637.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.03.019. Epub 2020 Apr 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.03.019
PMID:32307327
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7328785/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We sought to identify clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics in men with the Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) category 3 index lesions that predict clinically significant prostate cancer (CaP) on MRI targeted biopsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Multicenter study of prospectively collected data for biopsy-naive men (n = 247) who underwent MRI-targeted and systematic biopsies for PI-RADS 3 index lesions. The primary endpoint was diagnosis of clinically significant CaP (Grade Group ≥2). Multivariable logistic regression models assessed for factors associated with clinically significant CaP. The probability distributions of clinically significant CaP based on different levels of predictors of multivariable models were plotted in a heatmap.

RESULTS

Men with clinically significant CaP had smaller prostate volume (39.20 vs. 55.10 ml, P < 0.001) and lower apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values (973 vs. 1068 μm/s, P = 0.013), but higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density (0.21 vs. 0.13 ng/ml, P = 0.027). On multivariable analyses, lower prostate volume (odds ratio [OR]: 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.92-0.97), lower ADC value (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.99-1.00), and Prostate-specific antigen density >0.15 ng/ml (OR: 3.51, 95% CI 1.61-7.68) were independently associated with significant CaP.

CONCLUSION

Higher PSA density, lower prostate volume and ADC values are associated with clinically significant CaP in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADS 3 lesions. We present regression-derived probabilities of detecting clinically significant CaP based on various clinical and imaging values that can be used in decision-making. Our findings demonstrate an opportunity for MRI refinement or biomarker discovery to improve risk stratification for PI-RADS 3 lesions.

摘要

目的

我们旨在确定前列腺成像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)类别 3 索引病变的男性的临床和磁共振成像(MRI)特征,这些特征可预测 MRI 靶向活检中的临床显著前列腺癌(CaP)。

材料与方法

对 247 名接受 MRI 靶向和系统活检的活检初治男性(PI-RADS 3 指数病变)前瞻性收集的数据进行多中心研究。主要终点是诊断临床显著的 CaP(分级组≥2)。多变量逻辑回归模型评估与临床显著 CaP 相关的因素。根据多变量模型中不同预测因子水平绘制了临床显著 CaP 的概率分布热图。

结果

患有临床显著 CaP 的男性前列腺体积较小(39.20 与 55.10 ml,P<0.001),表观扩散系数(ADC)值较低(973 与 1068 μm/s,P=0.013),但前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)密度较高(0.21 与 0.13 ng/ml,P=0.027)。多变量分析显示,前列腺体积较小(比值比 [OR]:0.95,95%置信区间 [CI]:0.92-0.97)、ADC 值较低(OR:0.99,95% CI:0.99-1.00)和 PSA 密度>0.15 ng/ml(OR:3.51,95% CI 1.61-7.68)与显著 CaP 独立相关。

结论

在 PI-RADS 3 病变的活检初治男性中,较高的 PSA 密度、较低的前列腺体积和 ADC 值与临床显著 CaP 相关。我们提出了基于各种临床和影像学值检测临床显著 CaP 的回归衍生概率,可用于决策制定。我们的研究结果表明,有机会通过 MRI 优化或生物标志物发现来改善 PI-RADS 3 病变的风险分层。

相似文献

1
Multicenter analysis of clinical and MRI characteristics associated with detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in PI-RADS (v2.0) category 3 lesions.多中心分析与 PI-RADS(v2.0)分类 3 病变中检测临床显著前列腺癌相关的临床和 MRI 特征。
Urol Oncol. 2020 Jul;38(7):637.e9-637.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.03.019. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
2
Combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density predicts biopsy outcome in prostate biopsy naïve patients.前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分与前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)密度相结合可预测初次接受前列腺穿刺活检患者的活检结果。
BJU Int. 2017 Feb;119(2):225-233. doi: 10.1111/bju.13465. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
3
Multi-institutional analysis of clinical and imaging risk factors for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in men with PI-RADS 3 lesions.对PI-RADS 3级病变男性中检测临床显著性前列腺癌的临床和影像危险因素的多机构分析
Cancer. 2022 Sep 15;128(18):3287-3296. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34355. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
4
Prostate Health Index Density Outperforms Prostate-specific Antigen Density in the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Equivocal Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate: A Multicenter Evaluation.前列腺健康指数密度在前列腺磁共振成像不确定的情况下优于前列腺特异性抗原密度诊断临床显著前列腺癌:一项多中心评估。
J Urol. 2023 Jul;210(1):88-98. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003450. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
5
Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Associated With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 (Equivocal) Lesions Identified on Multiparametric Prostate MRI.多参数前列腺 MRI 检出前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)类别 3(可疑)病变与临床显著前列腺癌风险的相关性。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Feb;210(2):347-357. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18516. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
6
Predictors of prostate cancer detection in MRI PI-RADS 3 lesions - Reality of a tertiary center.MRI PI-RADS 3 病变中前列腺癌检出的预测因素——三级中心的现实。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2023 Dec 20;95(4):11830. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2023.11830.
7
Can the addition of clinical information improve the accuracy of PI-RADS version 2 for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in positive MRI?临床信息的加入能否提高 PI-RADS 版本 2 对 MRI 阳性中临床显著前列腺癌的诊断准确性?
Clin Radiol. 2020 Feb;75(2):157.e1-157.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.09.139. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
8
Contribution of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and Diffusion MRI to PI-RADS for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.动态对比增强磁共振成像和扩散加权磁共振成像对前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)检测临床显著性前列腺癌的贡献
Radiology. 2023 Jan;306(1):186-199. doi: 10.1148/radiol.212692. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
9
Detection of clinically signifi cant prostate cancer with PIRADS v2 scores, PSA density, and ADC values in regions with and without mpMRI visible lesions.在有和没有 mpMRI 可见病变的区域中,使用 PIRADS v2 评分、PSA 密度和 ADC 值检测临床显著前列腺癌。
Int Braz J Urol. 2019 Jul-Aug;45(4):713-723. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0768.
10
Impact of mandated prospectively reported apparent diffusion coefficient values on the rates of positivity for clinically significant prostate cancer by PI-RADS score.按 PI-RADS 评分,前瞻性报告的表观扩散系数值对临床显著前列腺癌阳性率的影响。
Acta Radiol. 2021 Jan;62(1):139-144. doi: 10.1177/0284185120915617. Epub 2020 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Clinical, and Biopsy Findings in Suspected Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.磁共振成像、临床和活检在疑似前列腺癌中的表现:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e244258. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.4258.
2
Elucidating the need for prostate cancer risk calculators in conjunction with mpMRI in initial risk assessment before prostate biopsy at a tertiary prostate cancer center.在三级前列腺癌中心进行前列腺活检前的初始风险评估中,结合 mpMRI 阐明前列腺癌风险计算器的需求。
BMC Urol. 2024 Mar 26;24(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01460-5.
3
Role of magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative prediction of early biochemical failure in localized prostate cancer.磁共振成像在局限性前列腺癌早期生化复发术前预测中的作用
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Mar 1;13(3):1440-1452. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-472. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
4
Sub-differentiation of PI-RADS 3 lesions in TZ by advanced diffusion-weighted imaging to aid the biopsy decision process.通过高级扩散加权成像对移行带中PI-RADS 3类病变进行亚分化,以辅助活检决策过程。
Front Oncol. 2023 Feb 10;13:1092073. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1092073. eCollection 2023.
5
Usefulness of grayscale values of hypoechoic lesions matched with target lesions observed on magnetic resonance imaging for the prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer.磁共振成像观察到的低回声病变的灰度值与靶病变匹配对预测临床显著前列腺癌的作用。
BMC Urol. 2022 Oct 29;22(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01111-7.
6
Clinical Utility of Prostate Health Index for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Patients with PI-RADS 3 Lesions.前列腺健康指数在PI-RADS 3类病变患者前列腺癌诊断中的临床应用价值
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 29;14(17):4174. doi: 10.3390/cancers14174174.
7
Utility of Clinical-Radiomic Model to Identify Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Biparametric MRI PI-RADS V2.1 Category 3 Lesions.临床影像组学模型在双参数MRI的PI-RADS V2.1 3类病变中识别具有临床意义的前列腺癌的效用
Front Oncol. 2022 Feb 24;12:840786. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.840786. eCollection 2022.
8
Does Adding Standard Systematic Biopsy to Targeted Prostate Biopsy in PI-RADS 3 to 5 Lesions Enhance the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer? Should All Patients with PI-RADS 3 Undergo Targeted Biopsy?在PI-RADS 3至5级病变的靶向前列腺活检中增加标准系统活检能否提高临床显著性前列腺癌的检出率?所有PI-RADS 3级患者都应接受靶向活检吗?
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jul 26;11(8):1335. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11081335.
9
Evaluation of a multiparametric MRI radiomic-based approach for stratification of equivocal PI-RADS 3 and upgraded PI-RADS 4 prostatic lesions.基于多参数 MRI 放射组学的方法评估可疑 PI-RADS 3 和升级的 PI-RADS 4 前列腺病变的分层。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 12;11(1):643. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80749-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System 3 Category Cases at Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.前列腺影像报告和数据系统 3 类前列腺癌多参数磁共振成像病例:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol Focus. 2020 May 15;6(3):463-478. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.06.014. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
2
The Learning Curve for Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy.磁共振成像/超声融合引导前列腺活检的学习曲线。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2019 Mar;2(2):135-140. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
3
Which clinical and radiological characteristics can predict clinically significant prostate cancer in PI-RADS 3 lesions? A retrospective study in a high-volume academic center.哪些临床和影像学特征可预测 PI-RADS 3 病变中的临床显著前列腺癌?高容量学术中心的回顾性研究。
Eur J Radiol. 2019 May;114:92-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.02.031. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
4
Detection of Individual Prostate Cancer Foci via Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.通过多参数磁共振成像检测个体前列腺癌病灶。
Eur Urol. 2019 May;75(5):712-720. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.031. Epub 2018 Dec 1.
5
Artificial intelligence in radiology.人工智能在放射学中的应用。
Nat Rev Cancer. 2018 Aug;18(8):500-510. doi: 10.1038/s41568-018-0016-5.
6
MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis.MRI 靶向或标准活检用于前列腺癌诊断。
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1767-1777. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801993. Epub 2018 Mar 18.
7
Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Interpretation Varies Substantially Across Radiologists.前列腺磁共振成像解读在放射科医生之间存在很大差异。
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Jul;5(4):592-599. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.11.010. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
8
Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Associated With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 (Equivocal) Lesions Identified on Multiparametric Prostate MRI.多参数前列腺 MRI 检出前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)类别 3(可疑)病变与临床显著前列腺癌风险的相关性。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Feb;210(2):347-357. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18516. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
9
Multicentre evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging supported transperineal prostate biopsy in biopsy-naïve men with suspicion of prostate cancer.多中心评估磁共振成像引导经会阴前列腺穿刺活检在疑似前列腺癌的初次活检男性中的应用。
BJU Int. 2018 Jul;122(1):40-49. doi: 10.1111/bju.14049. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
10
Sub-differentiating equivocal PI-RADS-3 lesions in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate to improve cancer detection.在前列腺多参数磁共振成像中对可疑 PI-RADS-3 病变进行亚分级以提高癌症检出率。
Eur J Radiol. 2017 Oct;95:307-313. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.08.017. Epub 2017 Aug 24.