• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Critically ill SARS-CoV-2-infected patients are not stratified as sepsis by the qSOFA.

作者信息

Ferreira Marion, Blin Timothee, Collercandy Nived, Szychowiak Piotr, Dequin Pierre-François, Jouan Youenn, Guillon Antoine

机构信息

CHRU de Tours, Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, CHRU Bretonneau, INSERM U1100, Centre d'Etude des Pathologies Respiratoires, Université de Tours, 2 Bd Tonnellé, 37044, Tours, France.

CHRU de Tours, Service de Pneumologie, INSERM U1100, Centre d'Etude des Pathologies Respiratoires, Université de Tours, 2 Bd Tonnellé, 37044, Tours, France.

出版信息

Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Apr 19;10(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00664-w.

DOI:10.1186/s13613-020-00664-w
PMID:32307609
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7167215/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e139/7167388/ec5dcdfb7609/13613_2020_664_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e139/7167388/ec5dcdfb7609/13613_2020_664_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e139/7167388/ec5dcdfb7609/13613_2020_664_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Critically ill SARS-CoV-2-infected patients are not stratified as sepsis by the qSOFA.根据快速序贯器官衰竭评估（qSOFA），重症新型冠状病毒肺炎（SARS-CoV-2）感染患者未被归类为脓毒症。
Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Apr 19;10(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00664-w.
2
Comparison of qSOFA and SIRS for predicting adverse outcomes of patients with suspicion of sepsis outside the intensive care unit.qSOFA与SIRS用于预测非重症监护病房疑似脓毒症患者不良结局的比较。
Crit Care. 2017 Mar 26;21(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1658-5.
3
Low Accuracy of Positive qSOFA Criteria for Predicting 28-Day Mortality in Critically Ill Septic Patients During the Early Period After Emergency Department Presentation.急诊就诊后早期危重症脓毒症患者 qSOFA 标准阳性预测 28 天死亡率的准确性较低。
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Jan;71(1):1-9.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.05.022. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
4
Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.SOFA 评分、SIRS 标准和 qSOFA 评分对 ICU 收治的疑似感染成人院内死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):290-300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20328.
5
Comparison of Sepsis-3 Criteria Versus SIRS Criteria in Screening Patients for Sepsis in the Emergency Department.急诊科中采用脓毒症3.0标准与全身炎症反应综合征（SIRS）标准筛查脓毒症患者的比较
Adv Emerg Nurs J. 2018 Apr/Jun;40(2):138-143. doi: 10.1097/TME.0000000000000187.
6
Mortality outcomes based on ED qSOFA score and HIV status in a developing low income country.发展中国家低医疗资源地区基于 ED qSOFA 评分和 HIV 状况的死亡率结果。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Nov;36(11):2010-2019. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 Mar 10.
7
Non-utility of sepsis scores for identifying infection in surgical intensive care unit patients.脓毒症评分对于识别外科重症监护病房患者感染的无用性。
Am J Surg. 2019 Aug;218(2):243-247. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.11.044. Epub 2018 Dec 8.
8
Accuracy of SOFA, qSOFA, and SIRS scores for mortality in cancer patients admitted to an intensive care unit with suspected infection.SOFA、qSOFA 和 SIRS 评分对疑似感染收入重症监护病房的癌症患者死亡率的准确性。
J Crit Care. 2018 Jun;45:52-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.12.024. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
9
Superior performance of National Early Warning Score compared with quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment Score in predicting adverse outcomes: a retrospective observational study of patients in the prehospital setting.国家早期预警评分优于快速脓毒症相关器官衰竭评估评分预测不良结局：一项在院前环境中对患者的回顾性观察研究。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2019 Dec;26(6):433-439. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000589.
10
Low sensitivity of qSOFA, SIRS criteria and sepsis definition to identify infected patients at risk of complication in the prehospital setting and at the emergency department triage.qSOFA、SIRS 标准和脓毒症定义对识别院前环境和急诊科分诊中感染风险患者的并发症的敏感性较低。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Nov 3;25(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0449-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Time‑dependent ROC curve analysis to determine the predictive capacity of seven clinical scales for mortality in patients with COVID‑19: Study of a hospital cohort with very high mortality.采用时间依赖性ROC曲线分析来确定七种临床量表对COVID-19患者死亡率的预测能力：一项高死亡率医院队列研究。
Biomed Rep. 2024 May 9;20(6):100. doi: 10.3892/br.2024.1788. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Association Between Artificial Intelligence Based Chest Computed Tomography and Clinical/Laboratory Characteristics with Severity and Mortality in COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients.基于人工智能的胸部计算机断层扫描与新冠病毒住院患者的临床/实验室特征、严重程度及死亡率之间的关联
J Inflamm Res. 2024 May 14;17:2977-2989. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S456440. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Covid-19 in Critically Ill Patients in the Seattle Region - Case Series.西雅图地区危重症新冠患者-病例系列。
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):2012-2022. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2004500. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
2
Prognostic Accuracy of Sepsis-3 Criteria for In-Hospital Mortality Among Patients With Suspected Infection Presenting to the Emergency Department.Sepsis-3 标准对急诊科疑似感染患者住院死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):301-308. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20329.
3
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).
Temporal changes in fecal microbiota of patients infected with COVID-19: a longitudinal cohort.新冠病毒感染患者粪便微生物群的时间变化：一项纵向队列研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Aug 18;23(1):537. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08511-6.
4
Comparison of Pneumonia Severity Indices, qCSI, 4C-Mortality Score and qSOFA in Predicting Mortality in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia.肺炎严重程度指数、qCSI、4C 死亡评分和 qSOFA 在预测 COVID-19 肺炎住院患者死亡率方面的比较
J Pers Med. 2022 May 16;12(5):801. doi: 10.3390/jpm12050801.
5
Fever, Tachypnea, and Monocyte Distribution Width Predicts Length of Stay for Patients with COVID-19: A Pioneer Study.发热、呼吸急促和单核细胞分布宽度可预测COVID-19患者的住院时间：一项前瞻性研究。
J Pers Med. 2022 Mar 12;12(3):449. doi: 10.3390/jpm12030449.
6
Brescia-COVID Respiratory Severity Scale (BRCSS) and Quick SOFA (qSOFA) score are most useful in showing severity in COVID-19 patients.布雷西亚-COVID 呼吸严重程度评分（BRCSS）和快速序贯器官衰竭评估（qSOFA）评分最能显示 COVID-19 患者的严重程度。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 8;11(1):21807. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01181-x.
7
Mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients failed to meet the criteria for the Berlin definition of ARDS.接受机械通气的新冠肺炎患者未达到ARDS柏林定义的标准。
Infection. 2022 Apr;50(2):545-546. doi: 10.1007/s15010-021-01694-7. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
8
Immunometabolic signatures predict risk of progression to sepsis in COVID-19.免疫代谢特征可预测 COVID-19 患者向脓毒症进展的风险。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 30;16(8):e0256784. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256784. eCollection 2021.
9
Prognostic Accuracy of Early Warning Scores for Clinical Deterioration in Patients With COVID-19.COVID-19患者临床病情恶化早期预警评分的预后准确性
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Feb 1;7:624255. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.624255. eCollection 2020.
10
Severity Scores in COVID-19 Pneumonia: a Multicenter, Retrospective, Cohort Study.新冠肺炎肺炎严重程度评分：一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 May;36(5):1338-1345. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06626-7. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义（脓毒症-3）》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
4
Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition.急性呼吸窘迫综合征：柏林定义。
JAMA. 2012 Jun 20;307(23):2526-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5669.