• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者与医疗服务提供者之间的沟通对癌症筛查的影响在不同种族和族裔群体中存在差异。

The influence of patient-provider communication on cancer screenings differs among racial and ethnic groups.

作者信息

Kindratt Tiffany B, Dallo Florence J, Allicock Marlyn, Atem Folefac, Balasubramanian Bijal A

机构信息

University of Texas at Arlington, Public Health Program, Department of Kinesiology, College of Nursing and Health Innovation, 500 West Nedderman Drive, Arlington, TX 76019-0259, United States.

Oakland University, Department of Public and Environmental Wellness, School of Health Sciences, United States.

出版信息

Prev Med Rep. 2020 Apr 2;18:101086. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101086. eCollection 2020 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101086
PMID:32309115
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7155227/
Abstract

Our study aimed to estimate how associations between adults' perceptions of specific domains of PPC quality and their likelihood of receiving cancer screenings differed by race and ethnicity. We analyzed 2011-2015 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data. Samples included 7337 women ages 50-74 (breast), 13,276 women ages 21-65 (cervical), and 9792 adults ages ≥50 years (colorectal). To examine individual domains of PPC quality (independent variables), adults reported how often providers: listened; showed respect; spent enough time; explained things; gave specific instructions; and demonstrated health literate practices (gave clear instructions and asked them to "teach-back" how they will follow instructions). Dependent variables were breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screenings. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the odds of receiving cancer screenings using a composite measure of PPC quality and separate domains. Hispanic and non-Hispanic black adults who reported their providers always demonstrated PPC quality had higher odds of receiving colorectal cancer screenings compared to those whose providers did not. Adults' perceptions of whether or not their provider gave them specific instructions increased their odds of receiving breast (Hispanics OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.09, 2.51; non-Hispanic blacks OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.06, 2.24) and colorectal (non-Hispanic whites OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.13, 1.66; Hispanics OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.01, 1.66; non-Hispanic blacks OR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.39, 2.65) cancer screenings. Non-Hispanic Asian women who reported their health care providers demonstrated "teach-back" had higher odds (OR = 2.25; 95% CI = 1.10, 4.62) of receiving cervical cancer screenings. Efforts to improve cancer screenings should focus on training providers to demonstrate health literate practices to improve cancer screenings.

摘要

我们的研究旨在评估成年人对初级保健质量特定领域的认知与他们接受癌症筛查可能性之间的关联如何因种族和族裔而有所不同。我们分析了2011 - 2015年医疗支出面板调查(MEPS)的数据。样本包括7337名年龄在50 - 74岁的女性(乳腺癌筛查)、13276名年龄在21 - 65岁的女性(宫颈癌筛查)以及9792名年龄≥50岁的成年人(结直肠癌筛查)。为了考察初级保健质量的各个领域(自变量),成年人报告了医疗服务提供者倾听、表示尊重、花费足够时间、解释事情、给出具体指示以及展示具备健康素养行为(给出清晰指示并要求他们“反馈”将如何遵循指示)的频率。因变量是乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查。多变量逻辑回归用于评估使用初级保健质量综合指标和各个单独领域来接受癌症筛查的几率。报告其医疗服务提供者始终展现出初级保健质量的西班牙裔和非西班牙裔黑人成年人接受结直肠癌筛查的几率高于那些医疗服务提供者未展现出该质量的成年人。成年人对其医疗服务提供者是否给予他们具体指示的认知增加了他们接受乳腺癌(西班牙裔:比值比[OR] = 1.65,95%置信区间[CI] = 1.09,2.51;非西班牙裔黑人:OR = 1.54,95% CI = 1.06,2.24)和结直肠癌(非西班牙裔白人:OR = 1.37,95% CI = 1.13,1.66;西班牙裔:OR = 1.29,95% CI = 1.01,1.66;非西班牙裔黑人:OR = 1.92,95% CI = 1.39,2.65)筛查的几率。报告其医疗服务提供者展示了“反馈”的非西班牙裔亚洲女性接受宫颈癌筛查的几率更高(OR = 2.25;95% CI = 1.10,4.62)。改善癌症筛查的努力应侧重于培训医疗服务提供者展示具备健康素养的行为以提高癌症筛查率。

相似文献

1
The influence of patient-provider communication on cancer screenings differs among racial and ethnic groups.患者与医疗服务提供者之间的沟通对癌症筛查的影响在不同种族和族裔群体中存在差异。
Prev Med Rep. 2020 Apr 2;18:101086. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101086. eCollection 2020 Jun.
2
Email Patient-Provider Communication and Cancer Screenings Among US Adults: Cross-sectional Study.美国成年人电子邮件患者-医疗服务提供者沟通与癌症筛查:横断面研究。
JMIR Cancer. 2021 Jul 30;7(3):e23790. doi: 10.2196/23790.
3
The Influence of Patient-Provider Communication on Cancer Screening.医患沟通对癌症筛查的影响
J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):1648-1657. doi: 10.1177/2374373520924993. Epub 2020 May 11.
4
Impact of Patient-Provider Race, Ethnicity, and Gender Concordance on Cancer Screening: Findings from Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.患者-提供者种族、民族和性别一致性对癌症筛查的影响:来自医疗支出调查的发现。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 Dec;26(12):1804-1811. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0660. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
5
US Older Adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions Perceptions of Provider-Patient Communication: Trends and Racial Disparities from MEPS 2013-2019.美国患有多种慢性病的老年人对医患沟通的看法:来自 MEPS 2013-2019 年的趋势和种族差异。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 May;38(6):1459-1467. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07899-2. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
6
The medical dialogue: disentangling differences between Hispanic and non-Hispanic whites.医学对话:厘清西班牙裔与非西班牙裔白人之间的差异
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Nov;22(11):1538-43. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0368-0. Epub 2007 Sep 20.
7
Patient Experience with Their Health Care Provider Among Non-Pregnant Women of Childbearing Age with Diabetes Mellitus by Race and Ethnicity in the United States.美国不同种族和族裔的育龄非孕妇糖尿病患者对其医疗服务提供者的体验
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2023 Jan 24;4(1):20-30. doi: 10.1089/whr.2022.0037. eCollection 2023.
8
Understanding racial/ethnic differences in breast cancer-related physical well-being: the role of patient-provider interactions.理解乳腺癌相关身体幸福感的种族/民族差异:医患互动的作用。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Aug;170(3):593-603. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4776-0. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
9
Racial Disparities in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: Have We Bridged the Gap?种族差异与分化型甲状腺癌:我们是否已经弥合了差距?
Thyroid. 2017 Jun;27(6):762-772. doi: 10.1089/thy.2016.0626. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
10
Determinants of racial/ethnic colorectal cancer screening disparities.种族/族裔结直肠癌筛查差异的决定因素。
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Jun 23;168(12):1317-24. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.12.1317.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers to cancer screening uptake and approaches to overcome them: a systematic literature review.癌症筛查普及的障碍及克服这些障碍的方法:一项系统的文献综述
Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 6;15:1575820. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1575820. eCollection 2025.
2
Breast Cancer Survivors' Perceptions of Their Cardiovascular Care During Treatment With Anthracyclines or Trastuzumab: A Qualitative Analysis.乳腺癌幸存者在接受蒽环类药物或曲妥珠单抗治疗期间对其心血管护理的认知:一项定性分析。
Cancer Med. 2025 Aug;14(15):e71106. doi: 10.1002/cam4.71106.
3
Testing proximal, intermediate, and health outcomes of patient centered communication among non-pregnant women of childbearing age with diabetes mellitus: Findings from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey 2012-2018.对患有糖尿病的育龄非孕妇进行以患者为中心的沟通的近端、中间和健康结局测试:来自2012 - 2018年医疗支出面板调查的结果
PEC Innov. 2023 Jun 28;3:100185. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100185. eCollection 2023 Dec 15.
4
Veterans' views of PARTNER-MH, a peer-led patient navigation intervention, to improve patient engagement in care and patient-clinician communication: A qualitative study.退伍军人对 PARTNER-MH 的看法,这是一种由同行领导的患者导航干预措施,旨在提高患者在护理中的参与度和医患沟通:一项定性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Sep;114:107847. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107847. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
5
Cervical Cancer Screening Knowledge, Perceptions, and Behaviors in a Multiracial Cohort of Low-Income, Underscreened Women in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州低收入、未充分筛查的多族裔队列中妇女的宫颈癌筛查知识、认知和行为。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2023 Sep;32(9):970-981. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2022.0412. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
6
Colorectal cancer screening disparities in Asian Americans: the influences of patient-provider communication and social media use.亚裔美国人结直肠癌筛查差异:医患沟通和社交媒体使用的影响。
Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Sep;34(9):813-827. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01720-z. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
7
Sociodemographic factors and perceived patient-provider communication associated with healthcare avoidance among women with psychological distress.社会人口学因素以及与心理困扰女性避免就医相关的医患沟通认知情况
PEC Innov. 2022 Mar 9;1:100027. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100027. eCollection 2022 Dec.
8
Patient Experience with Their Health Care Provider Among Non-Pregnant Women of Childbearing Age with Diabetes Mellitus by Race and Ethnicity in the United States.美国不同种族和族裔的育龄非孕妇糖尿病患者对其医疗服务提供者的体验
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2023 Jan 24;4(1):20-30. doi: 10.1089/whr.2022.0037. eCollection 2023.
9
The Impact of IT-Based Healthcare Communication on Mammography Screening Utilization among Women in the United States: National Health Interview Survey (2011-2018).基于信息技术的医疗保健沟通对美国女性进行乳房 X 光筛查的影响:国家健康访谈调查(2011-2018 年)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 5;19(19):12737. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912737.
10
Evaluating and Improving Cancer Screening Process Quality in a Multilevel Context: The PROSPR II Consortium Design and Research Agenda.评估和改进多层次背景下的癌症筛查过程质量:PROSPR II 联盟的设计和研究议程。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022 Aug 2;31(8):1521-1531. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0100.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers and Facilitators of Colorectal Cancer Screening Among a Hispanic Community in Michigan.密歇根州西班牙裔社区的结直肠癌筛查障碍和促进因素。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2020 Feb;7(1):137-143. doi: 10.1007/s40615-019-00643-3. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
2
Teach-Back Experience and Hospitalization Risk Among Patients with Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions: a Matched Cohort Study.带教回馈体验与门诊医疗敏感状况患者住院风险:一项匹配队列研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Oct;34(10):2176-2184. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05135-y. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
3
Quality and Experience of Outpatient Care in the United States for Adults With or Without Primary Care.美国有或没有初级保健的成年人的门诊医疗质量和体验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Mar 1;179(3):363-372. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.6716.
4
Barriers and Facilitators to Colorectal Cancer Screening Within a Hispanic Population.西班牙裔人群中结直肠癌筛查的障碍与促进因素
Hisp Health Care Int. 2019 Mar;17(1):23-29. doi: 10.1177/1540415318818982. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
5
Health Literacy Universal Precautions Are Still a Distant Dream: Analysis of U.S. Data on Health Literate Practices.健康素养通用预防措施仍是遥不可及的梦想:对美国健康素养实践数据的分析
Health Lit Res Pract. 2017 Oct;1(4):e216-e230. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20170929-01. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
6
Trends in breast and colorectal cancer screening among U.S. adults by race, healthcare coverage, and SES before, during, and after the great recession.大衰退之前、期间及之后,按种族、医保覆盖情况和社会经济地位划分的美国成年人乳腺癌和结直肠癌筛查趋势。
Prev Med Rep. 2017 Apr 5;7:239-245. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.04.001. eCollection 2017 Sep.
7
Up-to-Date on Preventive Care Services Under Affordable Care Act: A Trend Analysis From MEPS 2007-2014.《平价医疗法案》下预防性医疗服务的最新情况:2007 - 2014年医疗支出面板调查的趋势分析
Med Care. 2017 Aug;55(8):771-780. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000763.
8
Impact of provider-patient communication on cancer screening adherence: A systematic review.医患沟通对癌症筛查依从性的影响:一项系统评价。
Prev Med. 2016 Dec;93:96-105. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.09.034. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
9
Health System Performance for the High-Need Patient: A Look at Access to Care and Patient Care Experiences.高需求患者的医疗系统绩效:审视医疗服务可及性与患者就医体验。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2016 Aug;27:1-12.
10
Training Family Medicine Residents in Effective Communication Skills While Utilizing Promotoras as Standardized Patients in OSCEs: A Health Literacy Curriculum.在客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)中利用健康促进员作为标准化病人,对家庭医学住院医师进行有效沟通技能培训:一项健康素养课程。
Int J Family Med. 2015;2015:129187. doi: 10.1155/2015/129187. Epub 2015 Sep 29.