Suppr超能文献

医保受益人与丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮处方和医院及急诊使用相关的处方优先审批政策的关联。

Association of Formulary Prior Authorization Policies With Buprenorphine-Naloxone Prescriptions and Hospital and Emergency Department Use Among Medicare Beneficiaries.

机构信息

RTI International, Rockville, Maryland.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e203132. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3132.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Prior authorization requirements may be a barrier to accessing medications for opioid use disorder treatment and may, therefore, be associated with poor health care outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association of prior authorization with use of buprenorphine-naloxone and health care outcomes.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This comparative interrupted time series analysis examined enrollment and insurance claims data from Medicare beneficiaries with an opioid use disorder diagnosis or who filled a prescription for an opioid use disorder medication between 2012 and 2017. Over this period, 775 874 members were in 1479 Part D plans that always required prior authorization, 113 286 members were in 206 plans that removed prior authorization, 189 461 members were in 489 plans that never required prior authorization, and 619 919 members were in 485 plans that added prior authorization. Data analysis was performed from April 2019 to February 2020.

EXPOSURES

Removal or addition of prior authorization and new prescriptions filled for buprenorphine-naloxone.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Buprenorphine-naloxone use, inpatient admissions, emergency department visits, and prescription drug and medical expenditures.

RESULTS

The study population in 2012 included 949 206 Medicare beneficiaries (mean [SD] age, 57 [15] years; 550 445 women [58%]). Removal of prior authorization was associated with an increase of 17.9 prescriptions (95% CI, 1.1 to 34.7 prescriptions) filled for buprenorphine-naloxone per plan per year, which is a doubling of the number of prescriptions, on average. Each prescription filled was associated with statistically significant decreases in adverse health care outcomes: substance use disorder-related inpatient admissions decreased by 0.1 admission per plan per year (95% CI, -0.2 to -0.1 admission per plan per year), and substance use disorder-related emergency department visits decreased by 0.1 visit per plan per year (95% CI, -0.13 to -0.03 visit per plan per year) (all P < .001). Combining these results, removal of prior authorization was associated with a reduction in substance use disorder-related inpatient admissions by 2.0 admissions per plan per year (95% CI, -4.3 to -0.1 admissions per plan per year) and substance use disorder-related emergency department visits by 1.4 visits per plan per year (95% CI, -3.2 to -0.1 visits per plan per year).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Removing prior authorization for buprenorphine-naloxone was associated with an increase in the medication use and decreases in health care utilization and expenditures.

摘要

重要性

事先授权要求可能是获得阿片类药物使用障碍治疗药物的障碍,因此可能与不良的医疗保健结果相关。

目的

确定事先授权与丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮的使用和医疗保健结果之间的关联。

设计、设置和参与者:这项比较性中断时间序列分析研究了 2012 年至 2017 年间,医疗保险受益人与阿片类药物使用障碍诊断或开处阿片类药物使用障碍药物处方的保险索赔数据。在此期间,1479 个 Part D 计划中有 775874 名成员始终需要事先授权,206 个计划中有 113286 名成员取消了事先授权,489 个计划中有 189461 名成员从未需要事先授权,485 个计划中有 619919 名成员增加了事先授权。数据分析于 2019 年 4 月至 2020 年 2 月进行。

暴露情况

取消或增加事先授权和新开出的丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮处方。

主要结果和措施

丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮的使用、住院治疗、急诊就诊以及处方药和医疗支出。

结果

2012 年的研究人群包括 949206 名医疗保险受益人(平均[标准差]年龄,57[15]岁;550445 名女性[58%])。取消事先授权后,每个计划每年开出的丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮处方增加了 17.9 张(95%置信区间,1.1 至 34.7 张),平均处方数量增加了一倍。开出的每张处方都与不良医疗保健结果的显著下降相关:与物质使用障碍相关的住院治疗减少了 0.1 例/计划/年(95%置信区间,0.2 至 0.1 例/计划/年),与物质使用障碍相关的急诊就诊减少了 0.1 例/计划/年(95%置信区间,0.13 至 0.03 例/计划/年)(均 P < .001)。综合这些结果,取消事先授权与每个计划每年与物质使用障碍相关的住院治疗减少 2.0 例(95%置信区间,4.3 至 0.1 例/计划/年)和与物质使用障碍相关的急诊就诊减少 1.4 例(95%置信区间,3.2 至 0.1 例/计划/年)相关。

结论和相关性

取消丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮的事先授权与药物使用增加以及医疗保健利用和支出减少有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4758/7171554/524ab1a7c12c/jamanetwopen-3-e203132-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验