Stewart Maureen T, Andrews Christina M, Feltus Sage R, Hodgkin Dominic, Horgan Constance M, Thomas Cindy Parks, Nong Thuong
The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr;60 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e14394. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14394. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
To examine whether Medicaid managed care plan (MCP) utilization management policies for buprenorphine-naloxone and injectable naltrexone are related to key state Medicaid program policy decisions.
We abstracted data on state Medicaid regulatory and policy information from publicly available sources and publicly available insurance benefit documentation from all 241 Medicaid MCPs operating in 2021.
In this cross-sectional study, we used bivariate and multivariate analyses to examine whether Medicaid MCP prior authorization and quantity limits on receipt of buprenorphine and injectable naltrexone were associated with key state Medicaid choices to leverage federal funds to expand coverage and eligibility (Medicaid expansion, 1115 waivers) and to regulate Medicaid MCPs (uniform preferred drug lists, medical loss ratio remittance). Models were adjusted for MCP characteristics, including profit status, behavioral health contracting arrangement, National Committee for Quality Assurance accreditation, size, market share, and state opioid overdose death rates. Average marginal effects (AME) were reported.
Utilization management was common among MCPs, and restrictions were more commonly applied to buprenorphine than injectable naltrexone, despite its higher cost. States that required MCPs to comply with utilization management policies stipulated in a uniform preferred drug list were more likely to require prior authorization for buprenorphine (AME: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.15-0.42) and injectable naltrexone (AME: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.12-0.38). MCPs in states that required plans to pay back earnings above a certain threshold were less likely to require prior authorization for buprenorphine (AME: -0.30, 95% CI: -0.43 to -0.18).
Restrictions on medications for opioid use disorder are widespread among MCPs and vary by medication. State Medicaid regulatory and policy characteristics were strongly linked to MCPs' utilization management approaches. State Medicaid policy and contracting approaches may be levers to eliminate utilization management restrictions on medications for opioid use disorder.
研究医疗补助管理式医疗计划(MCP)针对丁丙诺啡 - 纳洛酮和注射用纳曲酮的使用管理政策是否与关键的州医疗补助计划政策决策相关。
我们从公开可用来源提取了关于州医疗补助监管和政策信息的数据,以及来自2021年运营的所有241个医疗补助MCP的公开可用保险福利文件。
在这项横断面研究中,我们使用双变量和多变量分析来研究医疗补助MCP对丁丙诺啡和注射用纳曲酮的预先授权和接收数量限制是否与州医疗补助利用联邦资金扩大覆盖范围和资格(医疗补助扩展,1115豁免)以及监管医疗补助MCP(统一的首选药物清单,医疗损失率汇款)的关键选择相关。模型针对MCP特征进行了调整,包括盈利状况、行为健康合同安排、国家质量保证委员会认证、规模、市场份额和州阿片类药物过量死亡率。报告了平均边际效应(AME)。
使用管理在MCP中很常见,尽管注射用纳曲酮成本更高,但限制措施更常用于丁丙诺啡而非注射用纳曲酮。要求MCP遵守统一首选药物清单中规定的使用管理政策的州,更有可能要求对丁丙诺啡(AME:0.29,95%置信区间:0.15 - 0.42)和注射用纳曲酮(AME:0.25,95%置信区间:0.12 - 0.38)进行预先授权。要求计划偿还超过一定阈值收益的州的MCP,对丁丙诺啡进行预先授权的可能性较小(AME: - 0.30,95%置信区间: - 0.43至 - 0.18)。
阿片类药物使用障碍药物的限制在MCP中普遍存在,且因药物而异。州医疗补助监管和政策特征与MCP的使用管理方法密切相关。州医疗补助政策和合同签订方法可能是消除阿片类药物使用障碍药物使用管理限制的杠杆。