• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乌干达小农养猪户参与式培训对控制非洲猪瘟的生物安全知识、态度和实践的影响。

Impact of participatory training of smallholder pig farmers on knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding biosecurity for the control of African swine fever in Uganda.

机构信息

International Livestock Research Institute, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

University of Prince Edward Islands, Charlottetown, PE, Canada.

出版信息

Transbound Emerg Dis. 2020 Nov;67(6):2482-2493. doi: 10.1111/tbed.13587. Epub 2020 May 17.

DOI:10.1111/tbed.13587
PMID:32311216
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7754142/
Abstract

We evaluated the impact of a participatory training of pig farmers on knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) of biosecurity relating to ASF control in two districts of Uganda using a randomized control trial (RCT). A total of 830 pig farmers from 32 villages were included in the study, with 425 farmers receiving training, while 405 did not. An item response theory model was used to assess the impact of the training on farmer's KAP. Logistic regression models were used to assess the factors that affected knowledge gain and change in attitude and practices after training. Focus group discussions (FGD) were carried out with selected farmers from the treatment group at the end of the intervention, to share their experiences and discuss potential factors that could hinder adoption of biosecurity in their communities. Results of the regression analyses showed that there was a significant effect of biosecurity training (p = .038) on gain in knowledge after 12 months, but there were limited changes in farmer's attitude and practice at 12 and 28 months after training. Pig production domain (peri-urban/urban production), group membership, gender (male) and education of the farmer positively influenced knowledge gain and attitude of farmers towards biosecurity. This paper provides empirical evidence on the impact of training intervention on biosecurity practices for disease prevention or control. In addition, it breaks down the components of the biosecurity practices and documents the specific challenges to its uptake by the farmers. It therefore relaxes the assumption of knowledge constraint as a barrier to uptake. The results clearly show that knowledge is not the binding constraint to uptake of the biosecurity interventions.

摘要

我们采用随机对照试验(RCT)评估了在乌干达两个地区对养猪户进行参与式培训对与 ASF 控制相关的生物安全知识、态度和实践(KAP)的影响。共有来自 32 个村庄的 830 名养猪户参与了这项研究,其中 425 名农民接受了培训,而 405 名农民未接受培训。我们使用项目反应理论模型评估了培训对农民 KAP 的影响。我们还使用逻辑回归模型评估了培训后影响知识获取以及态度和实践改变的因素。在干预结束时,我们对来自治疗组的部分农民进行了焦点小组讨论(FGD),以分享他们的经验并讨论可能阻碍其社区采用生物安全措施的潜在因素。回归分析结果表明,生物安全培训对 12 个月后的知识获取有显著影响(p=0.038),但培训后 12 个月和 28 个月时,农民的态度和实践变化有限。养猪生产领域(城乡周边生产)、团体成员身份、性别(男性)和农民教育对知识获取和农民对生物安全的态度产生积极影响。本文提供了关于培训干预对疾病预防或控制生物安全实践影响的经验证据。此外,它还分解了生物安全实践的组成部分,并记录了农民采用生物安全措施的具体挑战。因此,它放宽了知识约束是采用的障碍的假设。结果清楚地表明,知识并不是采用生物安全干预措施的约束性限制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd27/7754142/90406047ae40/TBED-67-2482-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd27/7754142/636ef8cef3da/TBED-67-2482-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd27/7754142/90406047ae40/TBED-67-2482-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd27/7754142/636ef8cef3da/TBED-67-2482-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd27/7754142/90406047ae40/TBED-67-2482-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of participatory training of smallholder pig farmers on knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding biosecurity for the control of African swine fever in Uganda.乌干达小农养猪户参与式培训对控制非洲猪瘟的生物安全知识、态度和实践的影响。
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2020 Nov;67(6):2482-2493. doi: 10.1111/tbed.13587. Epub 2020 May 17.
2
Enhancing knowledge and awareness of biosecurity practices for control of African swine fever among smallholder pig farmers in four districts along the Kenya-Uganda border.提高肯尼亚-乌干达边境沿线四个地区小农户对非洲猪瘟防控生物安全措施的知识和认识。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2016 Apr;48(4):727-34. doi: 10.1007/s11250-016-1015-8. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
3
African swine fever control and market integration in Ugandan peri-urban smallholder pig value chains: An ex-ante impact assessment of interventions and their interaction.乌干达城郊小农户生猪价值链中的非洲猪瘟控制与市场整合:干预措施及其相互作用的事前影响评估
Prev Vet Med. 2018 Mar 1;151:29-39. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.12.010. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
4
Smallholders' perceptions on biosecurity and disease control in relation to African swine fever in an endemically infected area in Northern Uganda.乌干达北部一个地方性感染地区小农户对非洲猪瘟的生物安全和疾病控制的看法。
BMC Vet Res. 2019 Aug 5;15(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-2005-7.
5
Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Related to African Swine Fever Within Smallholder Pig Production in Northern Uganda.乌干达北部小规模养猪生产中与非洲猪瘟相关的知识、态度和做法
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017 Feb;64(1):101-115. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12347. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
6
A survey of biosecurity practices of pig farmers in selected districts affected by African swine fever in Uganda.乌干达部分受非洲猪瘟影响地区养猪户生物安全措施调查。
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Aug 17;10:1245754. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1245754. eCollection 2023.
7
Co-created community contracts support biosecurity changes in a region where African swine fever is endemic - Part II: Implementation of biosecurity measures.合作制定社区契约有助于在非洲猪瘟流行地区进行生物安全变革——第二部分:生物安全措施的实施。
Prev Vet Med. 2023 May;214:105902. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2023.105902. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
8
Risk Factors for African Swine Fever in Smallholder Pig Production Systems in Uganda.乌干达小规模生猪养殖系统中非洲猪瘟的风险因素
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017 Jun;64(3):872-882. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12452. Epub 2015 Dec 12.
9
Co-created community contracts support biosecurity changes in a region where African swine fever is endemic - Part I: The methodology.合作共创社区契约支持在非洲猪瘟流行地区进行生物安全变革 - 第一部分:方法。
Prev Vet Med. 2023 Mar;212:105840. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2023.105840. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
10
Smallholder pig farming education improved community knowledge and pig management in Angónia district, Mozambique.小农养猪养殖培训提高了莫桑比克安戈尼亚地区社区的知识水平和养猪管理能力。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2020 May;52(3):1447-1457. doi: 10.1007/s11250-019-02148-x. Epub 2019 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge, Perception, and Practices Concerning African Swine Fever in Smallholder Pig Value Chain in North Central Nigeria: Implications for Adaptation of Prevention and Control.尼日利亚中北部小农户生猪价值链中关于非洲猪瘟的知识、认知与实践:对预防和控制适应措施的启示
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2025 Aug 28;2025:5582374. doi: 10.1155/tbed/5582374. eCollection 2025.
2
Spatiotemporal Distribution and Risk Factors of African Swine Fever Outbreak Cases in Uganda for the Period 2010-2023.2010 - 2023年乌干达非洲猪瘟疫情病例的时空分布及风险因素
Viruses. 2025 Jul 16;17(7):998. doi: 10.3390/v17070998.
3
Stakeholders' perspectives on communicating biosecurity to encourage behavior change in farmers.

本文引用的文献

1
African swine fever control and market integration in Ugandan peri-urban smallholder pig value chains: An ex-ante impact assessment of interventions and their interaction.乌干达城郊小农户生猪价值链中的非洲猪瘟控制与市场整合:干预措施及其相互作用的事前影响评估
Prev Vet Med. 2018 Mar 1;151:29-39. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.12.010. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
2
Quantitative assessment of social and economic impact of African swine fever outbreaks in northern Uganda.乌干达北部非洲猪瘟疫情社会经济影响的定量评估
Prev Vet Med. 2017 Sep 1;144:134-148. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
3
Qualitative analysis of the risks and practices associated with the spread of African swine fever within the smallholder pig value chains in Uganda.
利益相关者对生物安全信息传播以鼓励农民改变行为的看法。
Front Vet Sci. 2025 Mar 19;12:1562648. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1562648. eCollection 2025.
4
The impact of epidemic experiences on biosecurity behavior of pig farmers: an analysis based on protection motivation theory.疫情经历对养猪户生物安全行为的影响:基于保护动机理论的分析
One Health. 2024 Nov 17;19:100936. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100936. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Enhancing infection control practices and biosecurity plans on Swedish pig farms: insights, challenges, and strategies.加强瑞典养猪场的感染控制措施和生物安全计划:见解、挑战和策略。
Acta Vet Scand. 2024 Sep 11;66(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13028-024-00771-9.
6
Semiquantitative Risk Evaluation Reveals Drivers of African Swine Fever Virus Transmission in Smallholder Pig Farms and Gaps in Biosecurity, Tanzania.半定量风险评估揭示了坦桑尼亚小型养猪场非洲猪瘟病毒传播的驱动因素及生物安全漏洞
Vet Med Int. 2024 May 13;2024:4929141. doi: 10.1155/2024/4929141. eCollection 2024.
7
African Swine Fever Diagnosis in Africa: Challenges and Opportunities.非洲猪瘟在非洲的诊断:挑战与机遇
Pathogens. 2024 Apr 2;13(4):296. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13040296.
8
The first outbreak of African swine fever in Sweden: a survey of pig farmers' perceptions of information received, risks, biosecurity measures and future prospects.瑞典首次爆发非洲猪瘟:对养猪户对所收到信息、风险、生物安全措施和未来前景的看法的调查。
Acta Vet Scand. 2023 Dec 18;65(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13028-023-00722-w.
9
Status, evaluation, and influencing factors of biosecurity levels in pig farms in China.中国猪场生物安全水平的现状、评估及影响因素。
BMC Vet Res. 2023 Dec 13;19(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12917-023-03827-6.
10
The Influencing Factors of "Post-African Swine Fever" Pig Farm Biosecurity: Evidence from Sichuan Province, China.“非洲猪瘟后”猪场生物安全的影响因素:来自中国四川省的证据
Animals (Basel). 2023 Sep 28;13(19):3053. doi: 10.3390/ani13193053.
乌干达小农户生猪价值链中与非洲猪瘟传播相关的风险及做法的定性分析
Prev Vet Med. 2016 Dec 1;135:102-112. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
4
Biosecurity and the management of emergency animal disease among commercial beef producers in New South Wales and Queensland (Australia).澳大利亚新南威尔士州和昆士兰州商业肉牛养殖户的生物安全与突发动物疾病管理
Prev Vet Med. 2016 Nov 1;134:92-102. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
5
Determinants of Knowledge and Biosecurity Preventive Behaviors for Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Risk Among Chinese Poultry Farmers.中国家禽养殖户对高致病性禽流感风险的认知及生物安全预防行为的影响因素
Avian Dis. 2016 Jun;60(2):480-6. doi: 10.1637/11361-010116-Reg.
6
Enhancing knowledge and awareness of biosecurity practices for control of African swine fever among smallholder pig farmers in four districts along the Kenya-Uganda border.提高肯尼亚-乌干达边境沿线四个地区小农户对非洲猪瘟防控生物安全措施的知识和认识。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2016 Apr;48(4):727-34. doi: 10.1007/s11250-016-1015-8. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
7
Risk Factors for African Swine Fever in Smallholder Pig Production Systems in Uganda.乌干达小规模生猪养殖系统中非洲猪瘟的风险因素
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017 Jun;64(3):872-882. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12452. Epub 2015 Dec 12.
8
Epidemiological Overview of African Swine Fever in Uganda (2001-2012).乌干达非洲猪瘟流行病学概述(2001 - 2012年)
J Vet Med. 2013;2013:949638. doi: 10.1155/2013/949638. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
9
Improving Smallholder Farmer Biosecurity in the Mekong Region Through Change Management.通过变革管理提高湄公河地区小农户的生物安全水平
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2015 Oct;62(5):491-504. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12181. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
10
Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Related to African Swine Fever Within Smallholder Pig Production in Northern Uganda.乌干达北部小规模养猪生产中与非洲猪瘟相关的知识、态度和做法
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017 Feb;64(1):101-115. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12347. Epub 2015 Apr 16.