Ouma Emily, Dione Michel, Birungi Rosemirta, Lule Peter, Mayega Lawrence, Dizyee Kanar
International Livestock Research Institute, c/o Bioversity International P.O. Box 24384 Kampala, Uganda.
International Livestock Research Institute, c/o Bioversity International P.O. Box 24384 Kampala, Uganda.
Prev Vet Med. 2018 Mar 1;151:29-39. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.12.010. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
Pig production in peri-urban smallholder value chains in Uganda is severely constrained by impact of disease, particularly African swine fever (ASF), and the economic consequences of an inefficient pig value chain. Interventions in the form of biosecurity to control ASF disease outbreaks and pig business hub models to better link smallholder farmers to pig markets have the potential to address the constraints. However, there is a dearth of evidence of the effects of the interventions on performance and distribution of outcomes along the pig value chain. An ex-ante impact assessment utilising System Dynamics model was used to assess the impact of the interventions in peri-urban pig value chains in Masaka district. The results showed that although implementation of biosecurity interventions results in reduction of ASF outbreaks, it also leads to a 6.3% reduction in farmer profit margins per year but more than 7% increase in other value chain actors' margins. The pig business hub intervention alone results in positive margins for all value chain actors but minimal reduction in ASF outbreaks. When biosecurity and the pig business hub interventions are implemented together, the interaction effects of the interventions result in positive outcomes for both the control of ASF and improvement in farmers' margins. Farmers may therefore be unwilling to adopt biosecurity practices if implemented alone to control ASF outbreaks unless there is a corresponding financial incentive to compensate for the high costs. This has implications for policy or developing institutions to facilitate cost sharing arrangement among chain actors and/or third party subsidy to provide incentives for producers to adopt biosecurity measures.
乌干达城郊小农户价值链中的生猪生产受到疾病影响,尤其是非洲猪瘟(ASF),以及低效生猪价值链的经济后果的严重制约。以生物安全措施控制 ASF 疫情爆发以及采用生猪商业中心模式将小农户与生猪市场更好地联系起来的干预措施,有可能解决这些制约因素。然而,缺乏关于这些干预措施对生猪价值链绩效和成果分配影响的证据。利用系统动力学模型进行的事前影响评估,用于评估在马萨卡区城郊生猪价值链中实施这些干预措施的影响。结果表明,虽然实施生物安全干预措施可减少 ASF 疫情爆发,但也导致农民利润率每年下降 6.3%,而其他价值链参与者的利润率则提高了 7%以上。仅实施生猪商业中心干预措施会使所有价值链参与者都获得正利润率,但对 ASF 疫情爆发的减少作用微乎其微。当同时实施生物安全措施和生猪商业中心干预措施时,这些干预措施的相互作用会对控制 ASF 和提高农民利润率都产生积极效果。因此,如果单独实施生物安全措施来控制 ASF 疫情爆发,农民可能不愿意采用,除非有相应的经济激励措施来补偿高昂成本。这对政策制定者或发展机构意味着要促进价值链参与者之间的成本分担安排和/或第三方补贴,以激励生产者采取生物安全措施。