Institute of Marine Sciences (ICM), CSIC, 08003, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Department of Biosciences, Section for Genetics and Evolutionary Biology, University of Oslo, 0316, Oslo, Norway.
Microbiome. 2020 Apr 20;8(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00827-8.
The ocean microbiota modulates global biogeochemical cycles and changes in its configuration may have large-scale consequences. Yet, the underlying ecological mechanisms structuring it are unclear. Here, we investigate how fundamental ecological mechanisms (selection, dispersal and ecological drift) shape the smallest members of the tropical and subtropical surface-ocean microbiota: prokaryotes and minute eukaryotes (picoeukaryotes). Furthermore, we investigate the agents exerting abiotic selection on this assemblage as well as the spatial patterns emerging from the action of ecological mechanisms. To explore this, we analysed the composition of surface-ocean prokaryotic and picoeukaryotic communities using DNA-sequence data (16S- and 18S-rRNA genes) collected during the circumglobal expeditions Malaspina-2010 and TARA-Oceans.
We found that the two main components of the tropical and subtropical surface-ocean microbiota, prokaryotes and picoeukaryotes, appear to be structured by different ecological mechanisms. Picoeukaryotic communities were predominantly structured by dispersal-limitation, while prokaryotic counterparts appeared to be shaped by the combined action of dispersal-limitation, selection and drift. Temperature-driven selection appeared as a major factor, out of a few selected factors, influencing species co-occurrence networks in prokaryotes but not in picoeukaryotes, indicating that association patterns may contribute to understand ocean microbiota structure and response to selection. Other measured abiotic variables seemed to have limited selective effects on community structure in the tropical and subtropical ocean. Picoeukaryotes displayed a higher spatial differentiation between communities and a higher distance decay when compared to prokaryotes, consistent with a scenario of higher dispersal limitation in the former after considering environmental heterogeneity. Lastly, random dynamics or drift seemed to have a more important role in structuring prokaryotic communities than picoeukaryotic counterparts.
The differential action of ecological mechanisms seems to cause contrasting biogeography, in the tropical and subtropical ocean, among the smallest surface plankton, prokaryotes and picoeukaryotes. This suggests that the idiosyncrasy of the main constituents of the ocean microbiota should be considered in order to understand its current and future configuration, which is especially relevant in a context of global change, where the reaction of surface ocean plankton to temperature increase is still unclear. Video Abstract.
海洋微生物组调节着全球生物地球化学循环,其结构的变化可能会产生大规模的影响。然而,构成它的基本生态机制尚不清楚。在这里,我们研究了基本生态机制(选择、扩散和生态漂移)如何塑造热带和亚热带表层海洋微生物组中最小的成员:原核生物和微小的真核生物(微微型真核生物)。此外,我们还研究了对这一组合施加非生物选择的因素,以及生态机制作用下出现的空间模式。为了探索这一点,我们使用在环球探险 Malaspina-2010 和 TARA-Oceans 期间收集的 DNA 序列数据(16S 和 18S-rRNA 基因)分析了海洋表层原核生物和微微型真核生物群落的组成。
我们发现,热带和亚热带海洋微生物组的两个主要组成部分,原核生物和微微型真核生物,似乎由不同的生态机制构成。微微型真核生物群落主要由扩散限制构成,而原核生物群落则似乎由扩散限制、选择和漂移的联合作用塑造。温度驱动的选择似乎是一个主要因素,在少数选定的因素中,影响原核生物中物种共存网络,但在微微型真核生物中没有,表明关联模式可能有助于理解海洋微生物组的结构和对选择的反应。其他测量的非生物变量似乎对热带和亚热带海洋群落结构的选择作用有限。微微型真核生物的群落之间的空间分化程度更高,距离衰减程度更高,这与前者在考虑环境异质性后扩散限制更高的情况一致。最后,随机动态或漂移似乎在原核生物群落的结构中比微微型真核生物群落更重要。
生态机制的不同作用似乎导致热带和亚热带海洋中最小的浮游生物,原核生物和微微型真核生物之间的生物地理学截然不同。这表明,为了了解海洋微生物组的当前和未来结构,应该考虑海洋微生物组主要成分的特殊性,这在全球变化的背景下尤为重要,因为目前还不清楚海洋浮游生物对温度升高的反应。视频摘要。