• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过绘制语义关系的皮质表象来连接大脑中的概念。

Connecting concepts in the brain by mapping cortical representations of semantic relations.

机构信息

Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Department of Mathematical Sciences, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2020 Apr 20;11(1):1877. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15804-w.

DOI:10.1038/s41467-020-15804-w
PMID:32312995
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7171176/
Abstract

In the brain, the semantic system is thought to store concepts. However, little is known about how it connects different concepts and infers semantic relations. To address this question, we collected hours of functional magnetic resonance imaging data from human subjects listening to natural stories. We developed a predictive model of the voxel-wise response and further applied it to thousands of new words. Our results suggest that both semantic categories and relations are represented by spatially overlapping cortical patterns, instead of anatomically segregated regions. Semantic relations that reflect conceptual progression from concreteness to abstractness are represented by cortical patterns of activation in the default mode network and deactivation in the frontoparietal attention network. We conclude that the human brain uses distributed networks to encode not only concepts but also relationships between concepts. In particular, the default mode network plays a central role in semantic processing for abstraction of concepts.

摘要

在大脑中,语义系统被认为存储着概念。然而,关于它如何连接不同的概念和推断语义关系,人们知之甚少。为了解决这个问题,我们从人类受试者那里收集了数小时的功能磁共振成像数据,这些受试者在听自然故事。我们开发了一种基于体素的响应预测模型,并进一步将其应用于数千个新单词。我们的研究结果表明,语义类别和关系都是由空间上重叠的皮质模式来表示的,而不是由解剖上分离的区域来表示。反映从具体到抽象的概念发展的语义关系,是由默认模式网络中的激活模式和额顶叶注意力网络中的失活模式来表示的。我们得出的结论是,人类大脑不仅使用分布式网络来编码概念,还使用分布式网络来编码概念之间的关系。特别是,默认模式网络在概念的抽象处理中起着核心作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b20/7171176/d02eeadaca90/41467_2020_15804_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b20/7171176/c9046223b3ad/41467_2020_15804_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b20/7171176/65604cb092c9/41467_2020_15804_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b20/7171176/f8a7de07db2e/41467_2020_15804_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b20/7171176/e20d613f806d/41467_2020_15804_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b20/7171176/f2ea881e6194/41467_2020_15804_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b20/7171176/18a945916832/41467_2020_15804_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b20/7171176/a3c43f44ff06/41467_2020_15804_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b20/7171176/d02eeadaca90/41467_2020_15804_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b20/7171176/c9046223b3ad/41467_2020_15804_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b20/7171176/65604cb092c9/41467_2020_15804_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b20/7171176/f8a7de07db2e/41467_2020_15804_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b20/7171176/e20d613f806d/41467_2020_15804_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b20/7171176/f2ea881e6194/41467_2020_15804_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b20/7171176/18a945916832/41467_2020_15804_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b20/7171176/a3c43f44ff06/41467_2020_15804_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b20/7171176/d02eeadaca90/41467_2020_15804_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Connecting concepts in the brain by mapping cortical representations of semantic relations.通过绘制语义关系的皮质表象来连接大脑中的概念。
Nat Commun. 2020 Apr 20;11(1):1877. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15804-w.
2
Natural speech reveals the semantic maps that tile human cerebral cortex.自然语言揭示了覆盖人类大脑皮层的语义图谱。
Nature. 2016 Apr 28;532(7600):453-8. doi: 10.1038/nature17637.
3
Heteromodal Cortical Areas Encode Sensory-Motor Features of Word Meaning.异模态皮层区域编码词义的感觉运动特征。
J Neurosci. 2016 Sep 21;36(38):9763-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4095-15.2016.
4
Interactions between auditory and visual semantic stimulus classes: evidence for common processing networks for speech and body actions.听觉和视觉语义刺激类之间的相互作用:言语和身体动作的共同处理网络的证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Sep;23(9):2291-308. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21593. Epub 2010 Oct 18.
5
A Distributed Network for Multimodal Experiential Representation of Concepts.一种用于概念的多模式体验表示的分布式网络。
J Neurosci. 2022 Sep 14;42(37):7121-7130. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1243-21.2022. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
6
The Representation of Semantic Information Across Human Cerebral Cortex During Listening Versus Reading Is Invariant to Stimulus Modality.在听和读两种模式下,人类大脑皮层对语义信息的表示在刺激方式上是不变的。
J Neurosci. 2019 Sep 25;39(39):7722-7736. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0675-19.2019. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
7
Deep Artificial Neural Networks Reveal a Distributed Cortical Network Encoding Propositional Sentence-Level Meaning.深度人工神经网络揭示命题句级意义的分布式皮层网络编码。
J Neurosci. 2021 May 5;41(18):4100-4119. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1152-20.2021. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
8
Both Default and Multiple-Demand Regions Represent Semantic Goal Information.默认网络和多重需求区域都代表语义目标信息。
J Neurosci. 2021 Apr 21;41(16):3679-3691. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1782-20.2021. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
9
Behavioral correlates of cortical semantic representations modeled by word vectors.基于词向量模型的皮质语义表象的行为相关性。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Jun 23;17(6):e1009138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009138. eCollection 2021 Jun.
10
The relative contributions of visual and semantic information in the neural representation of object categories.视觉信息和语义信息在物体类别神经表示中的相对贡献。
Brain Behav. 2019 Oct;9(10):e01373. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1373. Epub 2019 Sep 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Compositionality in the semantic network: a model-driven representational similarity analysis.语义网络中的组合性:一种模型驱动的表征相似性分析
Cereb Cortex. 2025 Aug 1;35(8). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaf246.
2
A two-dimensional space of linguistic representations shared across individuals.个体间共享的语言表征二维空间。
bioRxiv. 2025 May 23:2025.05.21.655330. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.21.655330.
3
Differences in spatiotemporal dynamics for processing specific semantic categories: An EEG study.处理特定语义类别的时空动态差异:一项脑电图研究。

本文引用的文献

1
Default mode network can support the level of detail in experience during active task states.默认模式网络可以支持在主动任务状态下体验的细节水平。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Sep 11;115(37):9318-9323. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1721259115. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
2
Toward a universal decoder of linguistic meaning from brain activation.迈向基于大脑激活的语言意义通用解码器。
Nat Commun. 2018 Mar 6;9(1):963. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03068-4.
3
Taxonomic and thematic semantic systems.分类和主题语义系统。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 30;14(1):31918. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83417-0.
4
Neural Representations of Concreteness and Concrete Concepts Are Specific to the Individual.具体概念和具体概念的神经表示因人而异。
J Neurosci. 2024 Nov 6;44(45):e0288242024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0288-24.2024.
5
The neural basis of naturalistic semantic and social cognition.自然语义和社会认知的神经基础。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 21;14(1):6796. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56897-3.
6
Effects of second language acquisition on brain functional networks at different developmental stages.第二语言习得对不同发育阶段大脑功能网络的影响。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2024 Aug;18(4):808-818. doi: 10.1007/s11682-024-00865-y. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
7
Neural patterns differentiate traumatic from sad autobiographical memories in PTSD.神经模式可区分 PTSD 患者的创伤性和悲伤的自传体记忆。
Nat Neurosci. 2023 Dec;26(12):2226-2236. doi: 10.1038/s41593-023-01483-5. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
8
Modeling personality antecedents and second language self-efficacy constructs with emerging adults in Japan: Domain-specific matching for assessing global competence in applied contexts.对日本新兴成年人的个性前因和第二语言自我效能感结构进行建模:在应用情境中评估全球能力的特定领域匹配。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 15;13:1032573. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1032573. eCollection 2022.
9
Relation between acquisition of lexical concept and joint attention in children with autism spectrum disorder without severe intellectual disability.自闭症谱系障碍儿童词汇概念习得与共同注意的关系:无严重智力障碍。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 14;17(4):e0266953. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266953. eCollection 2022.
10
Exploring the Representations of Individual Entities in the Brain Combining EEG and Distributional Semantics.结合脑电图和分布语义学探索大脑中个体实体的表征
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Feb 23;5:796793. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.796793. eCollection 2022.
Psychol Bull. 2017 May;143(5):499-520. doi: 10.1037/bul0000092. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
4
The neural and computational bases of semantic cognition.语义认知的神经和计算基础。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017 Jan;18(1):42-55. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2016.150. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
5
A comparative evaluation of off-the-shelf distributed semantic representations for modelling behavioural data.用于行为数据建模的现成分布式语义表示的比较评估。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2016 May-Jun;33(3-4):175-90. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2016.1176907.
6
Dynamic reconfiguration of the default mode network during narrative comprehension.在叙事理解过程中默认模式网络的动态重新配置。
Nat Commun. 2016 Jul 18;7:12141. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12141.
7
The Latent Structure of Dictionaries.词典的潜在结构。
Top Cogn Sci. 2016 Jul;8(3):625-59. doi: 10.1111/tops.12211. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
8
Functions of the human frontoparietal attention network: Evidence from neuroimaging.人类额顶叶注意网络的功能:来自神经影像学的证据。
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2015 Feb;1:32-39. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Aug 30.
9
Toward a brain-based componential semantic representation.迈向基于大脑的成分语义表征。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2016 May-Jun;33(3-4):130-74. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2016.1147426. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
10
In defense of abstract conceptual representations.为抽象概念表征辩护。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Aug;23(4):1096-108. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0909-1.