• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Prodisc-C人工颈椎间盘置换术的力学稳定性:一项使用放射立体测量分析的初步观察性研究。

Mechanical Stability of the Prodisc-C Vivo Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A Preliminary, Observational Study Using Radiostereometric Analysis.

作者信息

van Hooff Miranda L, Heesterbeek Petra J C, Spruit Maarten

机构信息

Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Global Spine J. 2020 May;10(3):294-302. doi: 10.1177/2192568219850763. Epub 2019 May 23.

DOI:10.1177/2192568219850763
PMID:32313795
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7160805/
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the primary stability of the Prodisc-C Vivo cervical disc arthroplasty with regard to the adjacent cervical vertebrae using radiostereometric analysis (RSA), and to monitor its clinical performance.

METHODS

Sixteen patients with degenerative cervical disc disease were included. RSA radiographs were obtained at the first postoperative day, at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. Migration (translation [mm]) of the superior and inferior implant components were measured with model-based RSA, expressed along the 3 orthogonal axes, and calculated as total translation. Clinical outcomes were Neck Disability Index, numeric rating scales for neck and arm pain, Likert-type scales for satisfaction, and adverse events. Range of motion was reported as C2-C7 flexion-extension mobility (ROM).

RESULTS

At final follow-up, no significant increase over time in median total translation was found. One inferior and 3 superior components subsided but were asymptomatic. ROM remained stable and clinical outcomes improved over time. Although 3 patients were unsatisfied and 3 adverse events occurred, this was not related to translation of the components.

CONCLUSIONS

On a group level, both components of the Prodisc-C Vivo cervical disc arthroplasty remained stable over time and below the clinical threshold of 1 mm. Individual outliers for translation were not clinically relevant and probably related to settling of the components into the vertebral endplates. RSA allowed us to perform a preliminary but accurate study on the micromotion of a new cervical disc replacement in a small sample size, without putting large numbers of patients at risk.

摘要

研究设计

前瞻性队列研究。

目的

使用放射立体测量分析(RSA)研究Prodisc-C Vivo颈椎间盘置换术相对于相邻颈椎的初始稳定性,并监测其临床性能。

方法

纳入16例退行性颈椎间盘疾病患者。在术后第1天、术后6周、3个月和6个月获取RSA X光片。使用基于模型的RSA测量植入物上下组件的移位(平移[mm]),沿3个正交轴表示,并计算为总平移。临床结果包括颈部残疾指数、颈部和手臂疼痛的数字评分量表、满意度的李克特式量表以及不良事件。活动范围报告为C2-C7屈伸活动度(ROM)。

结果

在最终随访时,未发现总平移中位数随时间有显著增加。1个下组件和3个上组件下沉,但无症状。ROM保持稳定,临床结果随时间改善。尽管有3例患者不满意且发生了3起不良事件,但这与组件的平移无关。

结论

在组水平上,Prodisc-C Vivo颈椎间盘置换术的两个组件随时间保持稳定,且低于1 mm的临床阈值。个别平移异常值在临床上不相关,可能与组件在椎体终板中的沉降有关。RSA使我们能够在小样本量的情况下对一种新型颈椎间盘置换物的微动进行初步但准确的研究,而不会使大量患者面临风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b73/7160805/7cd332430ce5/10.1177_2192568219850763-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b73/7160805/671993d30e20/10.1177_2192568219850763-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b73/7160805/599f5083ddd0/10.1177_2192568219850763-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b73/7160805/b42be160ced4/10.1177_2192568219850763-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b73/7160805/77b468b29f72/10.1177_2192568219850763-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b73/7160805/7cd332430ce5/10.1177_2192568219850763-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b73/7160805/671993d30e20/10.1177_2192568219850763-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b73/7160805/599f5083ddd0/10.1177_2192568219850763-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b73/7160805/b42be160ced4/10.1177_2192568219850763-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b73/7160805/77b468b29f72/10.1177_2192568219850763-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b73/7160805/7cd332430ce5/10.1177_2192568219850763-fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Mechanical Stability of the Prodisc-C Vivo Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A Preliminary, Observational Study Using Radiostereometric Analysis.Prodisc-C人工颈椎间盘置换术的力学稳定性:一项使用放射立体测量分析的初步观察性研究。
Global Spine J. 2020 May;10(3):294-302. doi: 10.1177/2192568219850763. Epub 2019 May 23.
2
Changes in cervical range of motion and sagittal alignment in early and late phases after total disc replacement: radiographic follow-up exceeding 2 years.全椎间盘置换术后早期和晚期颈椎活动度和矢状位平衡的变化:超过 2 年的放射学随访。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Dec;11(6):688-95. doi: 10.3171/2009.7.SPINE0946.
3
ProDisc-C Total Disc Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Single-Level Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease: Seven-Year Follow-up of the Prospective Randomized U.S. Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Study.ProDisc-C全椎间盘置换术与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术治疗单节段有症状颈椎间盘疾病:美国食品药品监督管理局前瞻性随机研究器械豁免研究的七年随访
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Nov 4;97(21):1738-47. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01186.
4
Evaluation of mobility and stability in the Discover artificial disc: an in vivo motion study using high-accuracy 3D CT data.探索者人工椎间盘的活动度与稳定性评估:一项使用高精度三维CT数据的体内运动研究
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Sep;23(3):383-9. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.SPINE14813. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
5
Twelve-Month Follow-up of Lumbar Spine Range of Motion Following Intervertebral Disc Replacement Using Radiostereometric Analysis.使用放射立体测量分析对椎间盘置换术后腰椎活动度进行的12个月随访
SAS J. 2008 Mar 1;2(1):9-15. doi: 10.1016/SASJ-2007-0115-RR. eCollection 2008.
6
Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.融合术和Bryan人工椎间盘置换术后的颈椎运动学
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Feb;21(1):19-22. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180500778.
7
Comparison of Cobb technique, quantitative motion analysis, and radiostereometric analysis in measurement of segmental range of motions after lumbar total disc arthroplasty.腰椎全椎间盘置换术后节段活动度测量中Cobb技术、定量运动分析和放射立体测量分析的比较。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 Dec;22(8):602-9. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318198791e.
8
A RCT comparing 7-year clinical outcomes of one level symptomatic cervical disc disease (SCDD) following ProDisc-C total disc arthroplasty (TDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).一项随机对照试验,比较了ProDisc-C全椎间盘置换术(TDA)与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)治疗单节段症状性颈椎间盘疾病(SCDD)的7年临床疗效。
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jul;25(7):2263-70. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4431-6. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
9
Sagittal balance influences range of motion: an in vivo study with the ProDisc-C.矢状面平衡影响活动范围:一项使用ProDisc-C的体内研究。
Spine J. 2009 Feb;9(2):128-33. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.01.009. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
10
Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease.关于ProDisc-C全椎间盘置换术与前路椎间盘切除融合术治疗单节段有症状颈椎间盘疾病的前瞻性、随机、对照、多中心食品药品监督管理局研究性器械豁免研究结果。
Spine J. 2009 Apr;9(4):275-86. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.05.006. Epub 2008 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
[Comparison of short-term effectiveness of Prodisc-C Vivo artificial disc replacement and Zero-P fusion for treatment of single-segment cervical spondylosis].[Prodisc-C Vivo人工椎间盘置换与Zero-P融合治疗单节段颈椎病的短期疗效比较]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Sep 15;36(9):1132-1143. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202204103.

本文引用的文献

1
Review of long-term outcomes of disc arthroplasty for symptomatic single level cervical degenerative disc disease.颈椎单节段退行性椎间盘疾病症状性椎间盘置换的长期疗效评价
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2018 Mar;15(3):205-217. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2018.1433533. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
2
RSA in Spine: A Review.脊柱中的RSA:综述
Global Spine J. 2017 Dec;7(8):811-820. doi: 10.1177/2192568217701722. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
3
Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Treatment of Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Eight Prospective Randomized Controlled Trials.
颈椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术治疗症状性颈椎间盘疾病的中长期疗效:八项前瞻性随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 12;11(2):e0149312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149312. eCollection 2016.
4
A RCT comparing 7-year clinical outcomes of one level symptomatic cervical disc disease (SCDD) following ProDisc-C total disc arthroplasty (TDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).一项随机对照试验,比较了ProDisc-C全椎间盘置换术(TDA)与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)治疗单节段症状性颈椎间盘疾病(SCDD)的7年临床疗效。
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jul;25(7):2263-70. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4431-6. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
5
Geometry of inferior endplates of the cervical spine.颈椎下终板的几何学
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016 Mar;142:132-136. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.01.027. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
6
Footprint mismatch in total cervical disc arthroplasty.颈椎间盘置换术的足迹不匹配。
Eur Spine J. 2013 Apr;22(4):759-65. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2594-3. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
7
Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial.颈椎关节置换术与前路椎间盘切除融合术的比较结果:一项前瞻性、随机对照临床试验的四年临床结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Sep 21;93(18):1684-92. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00476.
8
Validity and responsiveness of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) for the neck.《颈椎核心结局测量指标(COMI)的有效性和反应度》
Eur Spine J. 2012 Jan;21(1):101-14. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1921-4. Epub 2011 Aug 20.
9
Neck Pain and Disability Scale and Neck Disability Index: validity of Dutch language versions.颈部疼痛和残疾量表及颈部残疾指数:荷兰语版本的效度。
Eur Spine J. 2012 Jan;21(1):93-100. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1920-5. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
10
Heterotopic ossification after cervical total disc replacement: determination by CT and effects on clinical outcomes.颈椎间盘置换术后异位骨化:CT 检测及其对临床结果的影响。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Apr;14(4):457-65. doi: 10.3171/2010.11.SPINE10444. Epub 2011 Feb 4.