Department of Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, and Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI.
University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, MI.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2020 May 7;77(10):771-780. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxaa060.
Clinical pharmacists in primary care clinics can potentially help manage chronic pain and opioid prescriptions by providing services similar to those provided within their scope of practice to patients with diabetes and hypertension. We evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of a pharmacist-physician collaborative care model for patients with chronic pain.
The program consisted of an in-person pharmacist consultation and optional follow-up visits over 4 months in 2 primary care practices. Eligible patients had chronic pain and a long-term prescription for opioids or buprenorphine or were referred by their primary care physician (PCP). Pharmacist recommendations were communicated to PCPs via the electronic medical record (EMR) and direct communication. Mixed-methods evaluation included baseline and follow-up surveys with patients, EMR review of opioid-related clinical encounters, and provider interviews.
Between January and October 2018, 47 of the 182 eligible patients enrolled, with 46 completing all follow-up; 43 patients (91%) had received opioids over the past 6 months. The pharmacist recommended adding or switching to a nonopioid pain medication for 30 patients, switching to buprenorphine for pain and complex persistent opioid dependence for 20 patients, and tapering opioids for 3 patients. All physicians found the intervention acceptable but wanted more guidance on prescribing buprenorphine for pain. Most patients found the intervention helpful, but some reported a lack of physician follow-up on recommended changes.
The study demonstrated that comanagement of patients with chronic pain is feasible and acceptable. Policy changes to increase pharmacists' authority to prescribe may increase physician willingness and confidence to carry out opioid tapers and prescribe buprenorphine for pain.
初级保健诊所的临床药师通过向糖尿病和高血压患者提供与其执业范围内相似的服务,有可能帮助管理慢性疼痛和阿片类药物处方。我们评估了针对慢性疼痛患者的药师-医师协作护理模式的可行性和可接受性。
该计划包括在 2 个初级保健诊所进行为期 4 个月的面对面药师咨询和可选的随访。符合条件的患者有慢性疼痛,长期服用阿片类药物或丁丙诺啡处方,或由初级保健医生(PCP)转诊。药师的建议通过电子病历(EMR)和直接沟通传达给 PCP。混合方法评估包括患者基线和随访调查、EMR 回顾与阿片类药物相关的临床接触,以及对提供者的访谈。
2018 年 1 月至 10 月期间,182 名符合条件的患者中有 47 名入组,其中 46 名完成了所有随访;43 名患者(91%)在过去 6 个月内服用过阿片类药物。药师建议为 30 名患者添加或改用非阿片类止痛药,为 20 名患者改用丁丙诺啡治疗疼痛和复杂持续阿片类药物依赖,为 3 名患者减少阿片类药物用量。所有医生都认为干预是可以接受的,但希望在开具丁丙诺啡治疗疼痛方面得到更多指导。大多数患者认为干预是有帮助的,但一些患者报告说医生对建议的改变跟进不足。
研究表明,共同管理慢性疼痛患者是可行和可接受的。为增加药剂师开具处方的权限而进行的政策改革可能会增加医生进行阿片类药物减量和开具丁丙诺啡治疗疼痛的意愿和信心。