Georgia Southwestern State University, United States.
Shippensburg University, United States.
Conscious Cogn. 2020 May;81:102933. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2020.102933. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
Binary vs. continuous conceptualizations of consciousness may have an unstated influence on experimental designs in unconscious perception research. The binary approach aims to compare a conscious condition (e.g., supraliminal, no or weak stimulus masking) to an unconscious condition (e.g., subliminal, heavy stimulus masking). In contrast, continuous designs tend to vary stimulus energy along a near-threshold continuum to determine changes in perception as a function of stimulus energy (or duration). The present study compared two experimental designs, binary vs. continuous, for the influence of target-masked prime stimuli on a Stroop task. The display parameters were inspired by emotional Stroop studies reporting unconscious perception. Neither experiment produced strong evidence of unconscious perception, but the experiment with a continuous design was more informative. We thus recommend sampling a range of near-threshold display parameters to yield straight-forward, unambiguous interpretations.
意识的二元与连续概念化可能对无意识知觉研究中的实验设计产生未明言的影响。二元方法旨在将有意识的条件(例如,超阈限、无或弱刺激掩蔽)与无意识的条件(例如,阈下、强刺激掩蔽)进行比较。相比之下,连续设计往往沿着近阈限连续体来改变刺激能量,以确定知觉变化作为刺激能量(或持续时间)的函数。本研究比较了两种实验设计,即二元与连续,以研究目标掩蔽的启动刺激对斯特鲁普任务的影响。显示参数的灵感来自于报告无意识知觉的情绪斯特鲁普研究。两个实验都没有提供无意识知觉的有力证据,但具有连续设计的实验更具信息量。因此,我们建议采样一系列近阈限显示参数,以得出直接、明确的解释。