Avneon Maayan, Lamy Dominique
Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Conscious Cogn. 2018 Mar;59:87-103. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.12.006. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
Research on the limits of unconscious processing typically relies on the subliminal-prime paradigm. However, this paradigm is limited in the issues it can address. Here, we examined the implications of using the liminal-prime paradigm, which allows comparing unconscious and conscious priming with constant stimulation. We adapted an iconic demonstration of unconscious response priming to the liminal-prime paradigm. On the one hand, temporal attention allocated to the prime and its relevance to the task increased the magnitude of response priming. On the other hand, the longer RTs associated with the dual task inherent to the paradigm resulted in response priming being underestimated, because unconscious priming effects were shorter-lived than conscious-priming effects. Nevertheless, when the impact of long RTs was alleviated by considering the fastest trials or by imposing a response deadline, conscious response priming remained considerably larger than unconscious response priming. These findings suggest that conscious perception strongly modulates response priming.
对无意识加工极限的研究通常依赖于阈下启动范式。然而,该范式在其所能解决的问题方面存在局限性。在此,我们研究了使用阈上启动范式的意义,该范式允许在恒定刺激条件下比较无意识启动和有意识启动。我们将一个关于无意识反应启动的标志性演示改编为阈上启动范式。一方面,分配给启动刺激的时间注意力及其与任务的相关性增加了反应启动的幅度。另一方面,与该范式固有的双重任务相关的较长反应时间导致反应启动被低估,因为无意识启动效应的持续时间比有意识启动效应短。尽管如此,当通过考虑最快的试验或设定反应期限来减轻较长反应时间的影响时,有意识反应启动仍然比无意识反应启动大得多。这些发现表明,有意识知觉强烈地调节反应启动。