• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的单中心经验。

Early vs. Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis - Single Center Experience.

机构信息

Clinic for General and Abdominal Surgery, University Clinical Center Republic Srpska, Banja Luka, Bosna i Hercegovina.

Private Clinic "Karabeg",Sarajevo, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

出版信息

Med Arch. 2020 Feb;74(1):34-38. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2020.74.34-37.

DOI:10.5455/medarh.2020.74.34-37
PMID:32317832
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7164737/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is now considered the procedure of choice that achieves a shorter recovery period after the surgery and reduction in the cost of treatment. Aim: The aim of the study is to prove which method: early or delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the method of choice in the treatment of acute cholecystitis by examining: duration of hospitalization, conversion rate, duration of surgery, postoperative complications, and total cost.

METHODS

The study was conducted at the University Clinical Center of Republika Srpska as a retrospective-prospective study from May 1 2013 until December 31 2019. Patients diagnosed with acute cholecystitis were divided into two groups: Patients designated for early laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 72 hours of admission (group A-42 patients), Patients designated for initial conservative treatment followed by a delayed interval of 6-12 weeks until surgery (group B-42 patients).

RESULTS

In both groups, there were statistically significantly more female respondents. The results showed that the average cost of treatment in the early treated group was statistically significantly lower than the cost of treatment in the delayed treatment group. The patients in the early group had shorter hospitalization times (an average of 2.8 days and 5.6 days in the delayed group of patients), a smaller percentage of conversions (4.8% in the early and 16.7 in the delayed group of patients), the total cost of in the early group it was 1300.83 KM, while in the delayed group it was 1645.43 KM.

CONCLUSION

Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a method to be preferred in surgical treatment.

摘要

介绍

腹腔镜胆囊切除术现在被认为是首选的手术方式,它可以缩短手术后的恢复时间并降低治疗费用。目的:本研究旨在通过检查:住院时间、转化率、手术时间、术后并发症和总费用,证明早期或延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术哪种方法是治疗急性胆囊炎的首选方法。

方法

该研究在塞族共和国临床中心进行,采用回顾性前瞻性研究,时间从 2013 年 5 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日。将诊断为急性胆囊炎的患者分为两组:入院后 72 小时内接受早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者(A 组-42 例),最初接受保守治疗,然后延迟 6-12 周手术的患者(B 组-42 例)。

结果

两组中女性患者比例均显著较高。结果表明,早期治疗组的平均治疗费用明显低于延迟治疗组。早期组患者的住院时间较短(平均 2.8 天和 5.6 天),转化率较低(早期组为 4.8%,延迟组为 16.7%),早期组的总费用为 1300.83 库纳,而延迟组为 1645.43 库纳。

结论

早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术是一种首选的手术治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Early vs. Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis - Single Center Experience.早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的单中心经验。
Med Arch. 2020 Feb;74(1):34-38. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2020.74.34-37.
2
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective, randomized study.急性胆囊炎早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Int Surg. 2014 Jan-Feb;99(1):56-61. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-13-00068.1.
3
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis: comparison of outcomes and costs between early and delayed cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎:早期和延迟胆囊切除术的结局和成本比较。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014 Dec;18(2 Suppl):40-6.
4
Acute cholecystitis: early versus delayed cholecystectomy, a multicenter randomized trial (ACDC study, NCT00447304).急性胆囊炎:早期与延迟胆囊切除术的多中心随机试验(ACDC 研究,NCT00447304)。
Ann Surg. 2013 Sep;258(3):385-93. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a1599b.
5
Early Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy For Acute Cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎的早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2017 Oct-Dec;29(4):570-573.
6
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for lithiasic acute cholecystitis during emergency admissions. Results of a monocentric experience and review of the literature.急诊入院时针对结石性急性胆囊炎的早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术。单中心经验及文献综述结果
Tunis Med. 2016 Aug-Sep;94(8-9):519-524.
7
Prospective randomized study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术的前瞻性随机研究。
Ann Surg. 1998 Apr;227(4):461-7. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199804000-00001.
8
[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis].[腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎]
G Chir. 2008 Jun-Jul;29(6-7):305-11.
9
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for people with acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎患者早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 30(6):CD005440. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005440.pub3.
10
Operative complications and economic outcomes of cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.胆囊炎行胆囊切除术的手术并发症和经济结局。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec 28;25(48):6916-6927. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i48.6916.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying the Prognostic Factors Affecting the Conversion From Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy to Open Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis.确定影响急性胆囊炎患者从腹腔镜胆囊切除术转为开腹胆囊切除术的预后因素。
Cureus. 2024 Nov 19;16(11):e73975. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73975. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Early vs. interval approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a retrospective observational study from Pakistan.急性胆囊炎腹腔镜胆囊切除术的早期与间隔期手术方式:一项来自巴基斯坦的回顾性观察研究
Front Surg. 2024 Sep 6;11:1462885. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1462885. eCollection 2024.
3
Symptom Duration and Surgeon Volume: Impact on Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis.症状持续时间与外科医生手术量:对急性胆囊炎早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的影响
Cureus. 2023 Oct 23;15(10):e47517. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47517. eCollection 2023 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence-based Reviews in Surgery: Early Cholecystectomy for Cholecystitis.循证外科评价:胆囊炎的早期胆囊切除术。
Ann Surg. 2018 Dec;268(6):940-942. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002867.
2
Early Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy For Acute Cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎的早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2017 Oct-Dec;29(4):570-573.
3
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: an analysis of early versus delayed cholecystectomy and predictive factors for conversion.急性胆囊炎的腹腔镜胆囊切除术:早期与延迟胆囊切除术分析及中转手术的预测因素
Minerva Chir. 2017 Dec;72(6):455-463. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4733.17.07412-0. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
4
Early Versus Delayed Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis, Are the 72 hours Still the Rule?: A Randomized Trial.早期与延迟胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎:72 小时仍然是金标准吗?:一项随机试验。
Ann Surg. 2016 Nov;264(5):717-722. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001886.
5
Outcomes of early versus delayed cholecystectomy in patients with mild to moderate acute biliary pancreatitis: A randomized prospective study.轻度至中度急性胆源性胰腺炎患者早期与延迟性胆囊切除术的结局:一项随机前瞻性研究。
Asian J Surg. 2018 Jan;41(1):47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.07.010. Epub 2016 Aug 13.
6
Should acute cholecystitis be operated in the 24 h following symptom onset? A retrospective cohort study.急性胆囊炎症状发作后 24 小时内应行手术治疗吗?一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2016 Jan;25:88-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.11.049. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
7
Single center retrospective analysis of early vs. delayed treatment in acute calculous cholecystitis: application of a clinical pathway and an economic analysis.急性结石性胆囊炎早期与延迟治疗的单中心回顾性分析:临床路径的应用及经济学分析
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2015 Sep;21(5):373-9. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2015.62679.
8
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis: comparison of outcomes and costs between early and delayed cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎:早期和延迟胆囊切除术的结局和成本比较。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014 Dec;18(2 Suppl):40-6.
9
Acute cholecystitis: early versus delayed cholecystectomy, a multicenter randomized trial (ACDC study, NCT00447304).急性胆囊炎:早期与延迟胆囊切除术的多中心随机试验(ACDC 研究,NCT00447304)。
Ann Surg. 2013 Sep;258(3):385-93. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a1599b.
10
Comparative operative outcomes of early and delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a population-based propensity score analysis.基于人群倾向评分分析的急性胆囊炎早期和延迟胆囊切除术的手术效果比较。
Ann Surg. 2014 Jan;259(1):10-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a5cf36.