Sastre Joaquín, Baldrich Esther Serra, Armario Hita José Carlos, Herráez L, Jáuregui Ignacio, Martín-Santiago Ana, Ortiz de Frutos Javier, Silvestre Juan Francisco, Valero Antonio
Service of Allergy, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, CIBERES, Instituto Carlos III, Department of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Dermatology Unit, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Dermatol Res Pract. 2020 Apr 7;2020:1524293. doi: 10.1155/2020/1524293. eCollection 2020.
The purpose of this study was to gather information on the current assessment and management of patients with moderate-to-severe AD in routine daily practice.
A cross-sectional two-round Delphi survey with the participation of dermatologists and allergologists throughout Spain was conducted. They completed a 46-item questionnaire, and consensus was defined when responses of ≥80% of participants coincided in the categories of a 5-point Likert scale for that item.
A total of 105 specialists (aged 40-59 years) completed the two rounds. Participants agreed regarding the consideration of AD as a multifaceted disease and the differences in clinical presentation of AD according to the patient's age. It is recommendable to perform a skin biopsy to exclude early stage T-cell cutaneous lymphoma, psoriasis, or dermatitis herpetiformis, among others (99.1%). Also, consensus was reached regarding the use of the SCORAD index to quantify the severity of the disease (86.7%), the use of wet wraps to increase the effect of topical corticosteroids (90.4%), the usefulness of proactive treatment during follow-up (85.6%) and tacrolimus ointment (91.2%) to reduce new flares, and the fact that crisaborole is not the treatment of choice for severe AD (92.4%). AD was not considered a contraindication for immunotherapy in patients with allergic respiratory diseases (92.4%). In patients with severe AD, the use of immune response modifier drugs (97.6%) or phototherapy (92.8%) does not sufficiently cover their treatment needs. Consensus was also obtained regarding the role of the new biologic drugs (93.6%) targeting cytokines involved in the Th2 inflammatory pathway (92.0%) and the potential role of dupilumab as first-line treatment (90.4%) in moderate-to-severe AD patients.
This study contributes a reference framework to the care of AD patients. There is no diagnostic test or biomarkers to direct treatment or to assess the severity of the disease, and many therapeutic challenges remain.
本研究的目的是收集关于中度至重度特应性皮炎患者在日常临床实践中的当前评估和管理信息。
在西班牙各地皮肤科医生和过敏症专科医生的参与下进行了两轮横断面德尔菲调查。他们完成了一份包含46个条目的问卷,当≥80%参与者对该条目的5级李克特量表类别的回答一致时,定义为达成共识。
共有105名专家(年龄40 - 59岁)完成了两轮调查。参与者一致认为特应性皮炎是一种多方面的疾病,且特应性皮炎的临床表现会因患者年龄而有所不同。建议进行皮肤活检以排除早期T细胞皮肤淋巴瘤、银屑病或疱疹样皮炎等(99.1%)。在使用SCORAD指数量化疾病严重程度(86.7%)、使用湿敷以增强外用糖皮质激素的效果(90.4%)、随访期间进行积极治疗的有用性(85.6%)以及他克莫司软膏减少新发作的有用性(91.2%)方面也达成了共识,并且认为克立硼罗不是重度特应性皮炎的首选治疗药物(92.4%)。特应性皮炎不被视为过敏性呼吸道疾病患者免疫治疗的禁忌证(92.4%)。在重度特应性皮炎患者中,使用免疫反应调节剂药物(97.6%)或光疗(92.8%)不足以满足其治疗需求。在针对参与Th2炎症途径的细胞因子的新型生物药物的作用(93.6%)以及度普利尤单抗作为中度至重度特应性皮炎患者一线治疗的潜在作用(90.4%)方面也获得了共识。
本研究为特应性皮炎患者的护理提供了一个参考框架。目前尚无用于指导治疗或评估疾病严重程度的诊断测试或生物标志物,并且仍然存在许多治疗挑战。