• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of different tooth brushes on the degree of plaque removal.不同牙刷在去除牙菌斑程度方面的比较。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Feb 28;9(2):556-560. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_666_19. eCollection 2020 Feb.
2
Effectiveness of Different Bristle Designs of Toothbrushes and Periodontal Status among Fixed Orthodontic Patients: A Double-blind Crossover Design.固定正畸患者中不同刷毛设计牙刷的有效性及牙周状况:双盲交叉设计
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Feb 1;19(2):150-155. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2229.
3
Comparative Efficacy of a Soft Toothbrush with Tapered-tip Bristles and an ADA Reference Toothbrush on Established Gingivitis and Supragingival Plaque over a 12-Week Period.软质锥形刷毛牙刷与美国牙医学会参考牙刷对已患牙龈炎和龈上菌斑的12周疗效比较
J Clin Dent. 2016 Jun;27(2):39-47.
4
Clinical effect of a manual toothbrush with tapered filaments on dental plaque and gingivitis reduction.一款采用锥形刷毛的手动牙刷在减少牙菌斑和牙龈炎方面的临床效果。
Am J Dent. 2017 Oct;30(5):272-278.
5
Clinical assessment of a manual toothbrush with CrissCross and tapered bristle technology on gingivitis and plaque reduction.采用交叉刷毛和锥形刷毛技术的手动牙刷对牙龈炎和牙菌斑减少效果的临床评估。
Am J Dent. 2019 Jun;32(3):107-112.
6
A comparative study of the efficacy of four different bristle designs of tooth brushes in plaque removal.四种不同刷毛设计的牙刷在去除牙菌斑功效方面的比较研究。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2007 Apr-Jun;25(2):76-81. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.33452.
7
Comparison of Manual Toothbrushes with Different Bristle Designs in Terms of Cleaning Efficacy and Plaque Control: A Pilot Study.不同刷毛设计手动牙刷在清洁效果和牙菌斑控制方面的比较:一项初步研究。
Indian J Community Med. 2023 Jan-Feb;48(1):108-111. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_404_22. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
8
Comparison of Plaque Removal and Wear between Charcoal Infused Bristle and Nylon Bristle Toothbrushes: A Randomized Clinical Crossover Study.含炭刷毛牙刷与尼龙刷毛牙刷在牙菌斑清除及磨损方面的比较:一项随机临床交叉研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Mar 1;20(3):377-384.
9
Blinded Clinical Evaluation of a New Toothbrush Design.一种新型牙刷设计的盲法临床评估。
J Clin Dent. 2015;26(4):86-90.
10
Clinical comparison of plaque removal and gingival bleeding reduction by two different brush heads on a sonic toothbrush.两种不同刷头的声波牙刷在去除牙菌斑和减少牙龈出血方面的临床比较。
J Clin Dent. 2000;11(2):29-34.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of two soft-bristle toothbrushes in plaque removal: a randomized controlled trial.两款软毛牙刷在去除牙菌斑方面的功效:一项随机对照试验。
Braz Oral Res. 2016 Nov 10;30(1):e134. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0134.
2
Combined effect of end-rounded versus tapered bristles and a dentifrice on plaque removal and gingival abrasion.圆头刷毛与锥形刷毛以及牙膏对牙菌斑清除和牙龈磨损的联合作用。
Braz Oral Res. 2016;30. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0037. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
3
Tapered toothbrush filaments in relation to gingival abrasion, removal of plaque and treatment of gingivitis.锥形牙刷刷毛与牙龈磨损、牙菌斑清除及牙龈炎治疗的关系
Int J Dent Hyg. 2008 Aug;6(3):174-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2008.00284.x.
4
Cleaning efficacy of a manual toothbrush with tapered filaments.
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2003;1(2):111-8.
5
EXPERIMENTAL GINGIVITIS IN MAN.人类实验性牙龈炎
J Periodontol (1930). 1965 May-Jun;36:177-87. doi: 10.1902/jop.1965.36.3.177.
6
Computer-based intraoral image analysis of the clinical plaque removing capacity of 3 manual toothbrushes.基于计算机的3种手动牙刷临床菌斑清除能力的口内图像分析
J Clin Periodontol. 2001 Aug;28(8):746-52. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.280805.x.
7
A comparison of electric toothbrushes in their potential to cause gingival abrasion of oral soft tissues.电动牙刷导致口腔软组织牙龈磨损可能性的比较。
Am J Dent. 1998 Sep;11(Spec No):S35-9.
8
A systematic study of the plaque removal efficiency of worn toothbrushes.一项关于磨损牙刷去除牙菌斑效率的系统研究。
J Dent Res. 1980 Dec;59(12):2047-55. doi: 10.1177/00220345800590120401.
9
Role of brushing technique and toothbrush design in plaque removal.刷牙方法和牙刷设计在清除牙菌斑中的作用。
Scand J Dent Res. 1984 Aug;92(4):344-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1984.tb00901.x.
10
Refinement of the Modified Navy Plaque Index to increase plaque scoring efficiency in gumline and interproximal tooth areas.改良海军菌斑指数的优化,以提高牙龈缘和牙邻面区域的菌斑评分效率。
J Clin Dent. 1992;3(Suppl C):C9-12.

不同牙刷在去除牙菌斑程度方面的比较。

Comparison of different tooth brushes on the degree of plaque removal.

作者信息

Verma Santosh Kumar, Sharma Nitesh, Singh Swati, Razi Md Ahsan

机构信息

Dental Institute, Department of Periodontics, RIMS, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.

Department of Periodontics, Hazaribag College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Hazaribag, Bihar, India.

出版信息

J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Feb 28;9(2):556-560. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_666_19. eCollection 2020 Feb.

DOI:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_666_19
PMID:32318381
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7113920/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

At present, different designs of tooth brushes are available, each one is being claimed to be the best by their manufacturers. There is a need to compare the plaque removal efficacy of the most popular designs.

AIM

The aim of the present study was to compare the degree ofplaque removal obtained with the use of two commercially available tooth brushes with round ended and thinner tip bristles.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study involved 60 subjects within age range 18-40 years, randomly distributed into 2 groups, 30 in each: Group A- round ended bristle, Group B- thinner tip bristle. Turesky, Gilmore, Glickman Modification of Quigley-Hein Plaque Index, (1970), (PI) was assessed at baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 6 weeks; and Muhlemann and Son, (1971), Sulcus bleeding index (SBI) at baseline and 2 weeks were assessed in each subject. Scaling was done at 2 week, 4 week, and 6 week after assessment of parameter. At 4 week the subjects were switched over to another type of brush for crossover evaluation.

RESULTS

Over 2 weeks, both the groups showed significant ( < 0.05) reduction in plaque score, better reduction in Group A with mean differences of 0.48 than 0.41 in Group B, though it was insignificant on intergroup comparison ( = 0.09). There was reduction in SBI in both groups with mean difference of 0.50 in Group A and 0.11 in Group B and this was statically insignificant. But on comparison, between the two groups at 2 weeks, statically significant reduction was there in Group A. Brushing with specified brush, after scaling, at 4 week Group A had significantly better plaque control ( < 0.01). Upon crossover analysis, better efficiency of round ended bristles was observed but it did not reach the significance level ( = 0.126).

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of the study, the data derived from the study show that both the toothbrushes had shown decrease in plaque scores. Round ended bristles were more efficient.

摘要

背景

目前,市面上有不同设计的牙刷,各制造商都宣称自己的产品是最好的。因此有必要比较最流行设计的牙刷在清除牙菌斑方面的功效。

目的

本研究的目的是比较使用两种市售的圆头和细尖刷毛牙刷清除牙菌斑的程度。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了60名年龄在18至40岁之间的受试者,随机分为2组,每组30人:A组为圆头刷毛牙刷组,B组为细尖刷毛牙刷组。采用Turesky、Gilmore、Glickman对Quigley - Hein菌斑指数的改良版(1970年)(PI)在基线、2周、4周和6周时进行评估;并在基线和2周时对每个受试者采用Muhlemann和Son(1971年)的龈沟出血指数(SBI)进行评估。在评估参数后的第2周、4周和6周进行洁治。在第4周时,受试者更换为另一种类型的牙刷进行交叉评估。

结果

在2周的时间里,两组的菌斑评分均显著降低(<0.05),A组的降低效果更好,平均差异为0.48,而B组为0.41,尽管组间比较差异不显著(=0.09)。两组的SBI均有所降低,A组平均差异为0.50,B组为0.11,且这在统计学上不显著。但在2周时两组比较,A组有统计学意义的显著降低。在洁治后,使用指定牙刷在第4周时,A组的菌斑控制明显更好(<0.01)。经交叉分析,观察到圆头刷毛的效率更高,但未达到显著水平(=0.126)。

结论

在本研究的局限性范围内,研究数据表明两种牙刷的菌斑评分均有所下降。圆头刷毛更有效。