Verma Santosh Kumar, Sharma Nitesh, Singh Swati, Razi Md Ahsan
Dental Institute, Department of Periodontics, RIMS, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Department of Periodontics, Hazaribag College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Hazaribag, Bihar, India.
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Feb 28;9(2):556-560. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_666_19. eCollection 2020 Feb.
At present, different designs of tooth brushes are available, each one is being claimed to be the best by their manufacturers. There is a need to compare the plaque removal efficacy of the most popular designs.
The aim of the present study was to compare the degree ofplaque removal obtained with the use of two commercially available tooth brushes with round ended and thinner tip bristles.
The study involved 60 subjects within age range 18-40 years, randomly distributed into 2 groups, 30 in each: Group A- round ended bristle, Group B- thinner tip bristle. Turesky, Gilmore, Glickman Modification of Quigley-Hein Plaque Index, (1970), (PI) was assessed at baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 6 weeks; and Muhlemann and Son, (1971), Sulcus bleeding index (SBI) at baseline and 2 weeks were assessed in each subject. Scaling was done at 2 week, 4 week, and 6 week after assessment of parameter. At 4 week the subjects were switched over to another type of brush for crossover evaluation.
Over 2 weeks, both the groups showed significant ( < 0.05) reduction in plaque score, better reduction in Group A with mean differences of 0.48 than 0.41 in Group B, though it was insignificant on intergroup comparison ( = 0.09). There was reduction in SBI in both groups with mean difference of 0.50 in Group A and 0.11 in Group B and this was statically insignificant. But on comparison, between the two groups at 2 weeks, statically significant reduction was there in Group A. Brushing with specified brush, after scaling, at 4 week Group A had significantly better plaque control ( < 0.01). Upon crossover analysis, better efficiency of round ended bristles was observed but it did not reach the significance level ( = 0.126).
Within the limitations of the study, the data derived from the study show that both the toothbrushes had shown decrease in plaque scores. Round ended bristles were more efficient.
目前,市面上有不同设计的牙刷,各制造商都宣称自己的产品是最好的。因此有必要比较最流行设计的牙刷在清除牙菌斑方面的功效。
本研究的目的是比较使用两种市售的圆头和细尖刷毛牙刷清除牙菌斑的程度。
本研究纳入了60名年龄在18至40岁之间的受试者,随机分为2组,每组30人:A组为圆头刷毛牙刷组,B组为细尖刷毛牙刷组。采用Turesky、Gilmore、Glickman对Quigley - Hein菌斑指数的改良版(1970年)(PI)在基线、2周、4周和6周时进行评估;并在基线和2周时对每个受试者采用Muhlemann和Son(1971年)的龈沟出血指数(SBI)进行评估。在评估参数后的第2周、4周和6周进行洁治。在第4周时,受试者更换为另一种类型的牙刷进行交叉评估。
在2周的时间里,两组的菌斑评分均显著降低(<0.05),A组的降低效果更好,平均差异为0.48,而B组为0.41,尽管组间比较差异不显著(=0.09)。两组的SBI均有所降低,A组平均差异为0.50,B组为0.11,且这在统计学上不显著。但在2周时两组比较,A组有统计学意义的显著降低。在洁治后,使用指定牙刷在第4周时,A组的菌斑控制明显更好(<0.01)。经交叉分析,观察到圆头刷毛的效率更高,但未达到显著水平(=0.126)。
在本研究的局限性范围内,研究数据表明两种牙刷的菌斑评分均有所下降。圆头刷毛更有效。