• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

刷牙方法和牙刷设计在清除牙菌斑中的作用。

Role of brushing technique and toothbrush design in plaque removal.

作者信息

Bergenholtz A, Gustafsson L B, Segerlund N, Hagberg C, Ostby N

出版信息

Scand J Dent Res. 1984 Aug;92(4):344-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1984.tb00901.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0722.1984.tb00901.x
PMID:6591370
Abstract

Twenty-four adults participated in an intraindividual crossover experimental study to compare the plaque removing ability of straight multitufted and V-shaped brushes. Twelve of the participants had loss of periodontal tissue resulting in open but healthy interdental areas while the other 12 displayed no periodontal breakdown. In part 1 the participants were asked to brush their teeth using their own brushing technique and length over two 12-day periods during which time they, at random, used one brush for the first and the other brush for the second period. In part 2 the participants were professionally brushed by two dental assistants using four brushing techniques (The Bass, The Roll, The Circular Scrub and The Horizontal Scrub) randomly assigned to the four quadrants of the mouth. Cleaning was performed once a day for two 5-day periods, during which time the participants refrained from brushing and interdental cleaning. Initial toothbrush assignment was randomized. At the beginning of the study and each test period no plaque or gingival inflammation was visible. At the end of each period the accumulated plaque was registered. The results showed that there was no difference between the two brushes tested in the unsupervised part. The plaque removing ability when using either of the brushes varied between participants. When professionally used the straight multitufted and V-shaped toothbrushes did not show any difference in plaque removal on buccal and lingual surfaces. Interproximally the V-shaped toothbrush was better at plaque removal than the straight one.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

24名成年人参与了一项个体内交叉实验研究,以比较直多束刷毛牙刷和V形刷毛牙刷的牙菌斑清除能力。其中12名参与者存在牙周组织丧失,导致牙间隙开放但健康,而另外12名参与者未出现牙周组织破坏。在第一部分,参与者被要求在两个为期12天的时间段内,按照自己的刷牙方法和刷牙时长刷牙,在此期间,他们随机在第一个时间段使用一种牙刷,在第二个时间段使用另一种牙刷。在第二部分,两名牙科助手使用四种刷牙方法(巴氏刷牙法、旋转刷牙法、画圈擦洗法和水平擦洗法)为参与者进行专业刷牙,这些方法被随机分配到口腔的四个象限。每天清洁一次,为期两个5天的时间段,在此期间参与者不进行刷牙和牙间隙清洁。最初的牙刷分配是随机的。在研究开始时和每个测试阶段,均未观察到牙菌斑或牙龈炎症。在每个阶段结束时,记录累积的牙菌斑。结果表明,在无监督的部分,测试的两种牙刷之间没有差异。使用任何一种牙刷时,参与者之间的牙菌斑清除能力各不相同。在专业刷牙时,直多束刷毛牙刷和V形刷毛牙刷在颊面和舌面的牙菌斑清除方面没有显示出任何差异。在牙间隙处,V形刷毛牙刷比直多束刷毛牙刷在清除牙菌斑方面表现更好。(摘要截选至250词)

相似文献

1
Role of brushing technique and toothbrush design in plaque removal.刷牙方法和牙刷设计在清除牙菌斑中的作用。
Scand J Dent Res. 1984 Aug;92(4):344-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1984.tb00901.x.
2
Efficacy of straight versus angled interdental brushes on interproximal tooth cleaning: a randomized controlled trial.直型与角度型邻间牙刷对邻面牙齿清洁效果的随机对照试验。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2014 May;12(2):152-7. doi: 10.1111/idh.12042. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
3
Toothbrushing force in relation to plaque removal.与牙菌斑清除相关的刷牙力度
J Clin Periodontol. 1996 Aug;23(8):724-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1996.tb00601.x.
4
Gingival abrasion and plaque removal with manual versus electric toothbrushing.手动刷牙与电动刷牙对牙龈磨损及牙菌斑清除的影响
J Clin Periodontol. 1986 Aug;13(7):709-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1986.tb00869.x.
5
Comparative efficacy of a specially engineered sonic powered toothbrush with unique sensing and control technologies to two commercially available power toothbrushes on established plaque and gingivitis.一款具有独特传感和控制技术的特殊设计声波电动牙刷与两款市售电动牙刷在已形成的牙菌斑和牙龈炎方面的比较疗效。
J Clin Dent. 2012;23 Spec No A:A5-10.
6
A comparative study of plaque removing efficiency using rotary electric and manual toothbrushes.使用旋转电动牙刷和手动牙刷去除牙菌斑效率的比较研究。
Swed Dent J. 1991;15(5):229-34.
7
Comparison of the clinical effects and gingival abrasion aspects of manual and electric toothbrushes.手动牙刷和电动牙刷的临床效果及牙龈磨损情况比较。
J Clin Periodontol. 2001 Jan;28(1):65-72. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.280110.x.
8
Comparison of a double-textured prototype manual toothbrush with 3 branded products. A professional brushing study.一款双纹理原型手动牙刷与三款品牌产品的比较。一项专业刷牙研究。
J Clin Periodontol. 2000 Oct;27(10):744-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027010744.x.
9
Comparative professional plaque removal study using 8 branded toothbrushes.使用8种品牌牙刷的专业菌斑清除效果对比研究。
J Clin Periodontol. 2002 Apr;29(4):310-6. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.290406.x.
10
The plaque-removing efficacy of a finger brush (I-Brush).手指刷(I型牙刷)的牙菌斑清除效果。
J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Dec;31(12):1084-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00607.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Evaluation of Toothbrushes for Elderly Patients: A Crossover Study.老年患者牙刷的临床评价:一项交叉研究。
Int Dent J. 2023 Feb;73(1):93-100. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2022.10.001. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
2
Effect of the toothbrush tuft arrangement and bristle stiffness on the abrasive dentin wear.刷毛排列和刷毛硬度对牙本质磨耗的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 17;12(1):840. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-04884-x.
3
Evaluation of the isosceles-configured SUN Teethtoothbrush in dental plaque removal and gingival health.评价 SUN 牙间刷(等腰型)在牙菌斑清除和牙龈健康方面的效果。
Can J Dent Hyg. 2021 Jun 1;55(2):101-109.
4
Effectiveness of Manual Toothbrushing Techniques on Plaque and Gingivitis: A Systematic Review.手动刷牙技术对牙菌斑和牙龈炎的有效性:一项系统评价。
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2020 Oct 2;18(4):843-854. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a45354.
5
Comparison of different tooth brushes on the degree of plaque removal.不同牙刷在去除牙菌斑程度方面的比较。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Feb 28;9(2):556-560. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_666_19. eCollection 2020 Feb.
6
Comparison of modified Bass, Fones and normal tooth brushing technique for the efficacy of plaque control in young adults- A randomized clinical trial.改良巴氏刷牙法、Fones刷牙法与普通刷牙法对年轻成年人牙菌斑控制效果的比较——一项随机临床试验
J Clin Exp Dent. 2020 Feb 1;12(2):e123-e129. doi: 10.4317/jced.55747. eCollection 2020 Feb.
7
Laboratory Investigation Comparing Plaque Removal Efficacy of Two Novel-Design Toothbrushes with Different Brushing Techniques.比较两种新型设计牙刷采用不同刷牙技巧时牙菌斑清除效果的实验室研究。
Dent J (Basel). 2018 Apr 7;6(2):8. doi: 10.3390/dj6020008.
8
Toothbrushing and flossing behaviour in young adults--a video observation.年轻人的刷牙和使用牙线行为——一项视频观察研究
Clin Oral Investig. 2015 May;19(4):851-8. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1306-2. Epub 2014 Sep 4.
9
Improving oral hygiene skills by computer-based training: a randomized controlled comparison of the modified Bass and the Fones techniques.通过基于计算机的培训来提高口腔卫生技能:改良 Bass 法与 Fones 技术的随机对照比较。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37072. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037072. Epub 2012 May 21.
10
Professional brushing study comparing the effectiveness of sonic brush heads with manual toothbrushes: a single blinded, randomized clinical trial.专业刷牙研究比较声波刷头和手动牙刷的效果:一项单盲、随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Aug;15(4):451-60. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0411-0. Epub 2010 Apr 13.