• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西澳大利亚 40 孕周未分娩的严重生长受限儿特征。

Profile of severely growth-restricted births undelivered at 40 weeks in Western Australia.

机构信息

Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia.

Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Jun;301(6):1383-1396. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05537-y. Epub 2020 Apr 21.

DOI:10.1007/s00404-020-05537-y
PMID:32318796
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the proportion of severely growth-restricted singleton births < 3rd percentile (proxy for severe fetal growth restriction; FGR) undelivered at 40 weeks (FGR_40), and compare maternal characteristics and outcomes of FGR_40 births and FGR births at 37-39 weeks' (FGR_37-39) to those not born small-for-gestational-age at term (Not SGA_37+).

METHODS

The annual rates of singleton FGR_40 births from 2006 to 2015 were calculated using data from linked Western Australian population health datasets. Using 2013-2015 data, maternal factors associated with FGR births were investigated using multinomial logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) while relative risks (RR) of birth outcomes between each group were calculated using Poisson regression. Neonatal adverse outcomes were identified using a published composite indicator (diagnoses, procedures and other factors).

RESULTS

The rate of singleton FGR_40 births decreased by 23.0% between 2006 and 2015. Factors strongly associated with FGR_40 and FGR_37-39 births compared to Not SGA_37+ births included the mother being primiparous (ORs 3.13: 95% CI 2.59-3.79; 1.69, 95% CI 1.47, 1.94, respectively) and ante-natal smoking (ORs 2.55, 95% CI 1.97, 3.32; 4.48, 95% CI 3.74, 5.36, respectively). FGR_40 and FGR_37-39 infants were more likely to have a neonatal adverse outcome (RRs 1.70, 95% CI 1.41, 2.06 and 2.46 95% CI 2.18, 2.46, respectively) compared to Not SGA 37+ infants.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher levels of poor perinatal outcomes among FGR births highlight the importance of appropriate management including fetal growth monitoring. Regular population-level monitoring of FGR_40 rates may lead to reduced numbers of poor outcomes.

摘要

目的

调查出生时胎龄<第 3 百分位数(代表严重胎儿生长受限;FGR)且未在 40 周分娩的单胎出生比例(FGR_40),并比较 FGR_40 分娩和 37-39 周分娩(FGR_37-39)与足月非小于胎龄儿(Not SGA_37+)的产妇特征和结局。

方法

使用来自西澳大利亚州人口健康数据集的链接数据,计算 2006 年至 2015 年 FGR_40 单胎出生的年度发生率。使用 2013-2015 年的数据,采用多项逻辑回归调查与 FGR 分娩相关的产妇因素,以估计比值比(OR)及其 95%置信区间(CI),同时使用泊松回归计算每组之间的出生结局相对风险(RR)。新生儿不良结局使用已发表的复合指标(诊断、程序和其他因素)来确定。

结果

2006 年至 2015 年间,FGR_40 单胎出生率下降了 23.0%。与 Not SGA_37+ 分娩相比,FGR_40 和 FGR_37-39 分娩的强烈相关因素包括产妇为初产妇(ORs 3.13:95%CI 2.59-3.79;1.69,95%CI 1.47-1.94)和产前吸烟(ORs 2.55,95%CI 1.97-3.32;4.48,95%CI 3.74-5.36)。与 Not SGA 37+ 婴儿相比,FGR_40 和 FGR_37-39 婴儿更有可能出现新生儿不良结局(RRs 1.70,95%CI 1.41-2.06 和 2.46 95%CI 2.18-2.46)。

结论

FGR 分娩中较高水平的围产儿不良结局突出表明需要适当的管理,包括胎儿生长监测。定期监测 FGR_40 发生率可能会减少不良结局的发生。

相似文献

1
Profile of severely growth-restricted births undelivered at 40 weeks in Western Australia.西澳大利亚 40 孕周未分娩的严重生长受限儿特征。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Jun;301(6):1383-1396. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05537-y. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
2
Association Between Iatrogenic Delivery for Suspected Fetal Growth Restriction and Childhood School Outcomes.疑似胎儿生长受限的医源性分娩与儿童在校学习成绩的关系。
JAMA. 2021 Jul 13;326(2):145-153. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.8608.
3
Does the Presence of Risk Factors for Fetal Growth Restriction Increase the Probability of Antenatal Detection? A French National Study.胎儿生长受限风险因素的存在是否会增加产前检测的概率?一项法国全国性研究。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;30(1):46-55. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12251. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
4
Antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction and risk of stillbirth: population-based case-control study.产前检测胎儿生长受限及死胎风险:基于人群的病例对照研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 May;55(5):613-620. doi: 10.1002/uog.20414.
5
Fetal growth restriction and intra-uterine growth restriction: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.胎儿生长受限与宫内生长受限:法国妇产科医师学院临床实践指南
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Oct;193:10-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.06.021. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
6
Poor effectiveness of antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction and consequences for obstetric management and neonatal outcomes: a French national study.产前检测胎儿生长受限效果不佳及其对产科管理和新生儿结局的影响:一项法国全国性研究。
BJOG. 2015 Mar;122(4):518-27. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13148. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
7
Ten-year experience of protocol-based management of small-for-gestational-age fetuses: perinatal outcome in late-pregnancy cases diagnosed after 32 weeks.基于方案的小胎龄儿管理十年经验:32 周后诊断的晚期妊娠病例的围生期结局。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jan;57(1):62-69. doi: 10.1002/uog.23537.
8
Keep it in the family: comparing perinatal risks in small-for-gestational-age infants based on population vs within-sibling designs.家族内比较:基于人群设计与同胞内设计比较胎儿生长受限儿的围生期风险。
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Feb 1;48(1):297-306. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy196.
9
Outcome-based comparison of SMFM and ISUOG definitions of fetal growth restriction.基于结局的 SMFM 和 ISUOG 胎儿生长受限定义的比较。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun;57(6):925-930. doi: 10.1002/uog.23638.
10
Birthweight percentiles by gestational age for births following assisted reproductive technology in Australia and New Zealand, 2002-2010.2002年至2010年澳大利亚和新西兰辅助生殖技术后出生的按胎龄划分的出生体重百分位数。
Hum Reprod. 2014 Aug;29(8):1787-800. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu120. Epub 2014 Jun 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnostic performance of third-trimester ultrasound for the prediction of late-onset fetal growth restriction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.三/孕期超声对预测晚发型胎儿生长受限的诊断性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 May;220(5):449-459.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.043. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
2
Improving, but could do better: Trends in gestation-specific stillbirth in Australia, 1994-2015.虽有改善,但仍有提升空间:1994 - 2015年澳大利亚特定孕周死产趋势
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2018 Nov;32(6):487-494. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12508. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
3
Counterpoint.
对位法
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;220(1):74-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.10.006. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
4
Point.要点。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;220(1):74-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.10.007. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
5
Epidemiology of late preterm and early term births - An international perspective.晚期早产儿和早期足月产的流行病学-国际视角。
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Feb;24(1):3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
6
Stillbirth in Western Australia, 2005-2013: the influence of maternal migration and ethnic origin.2005-2013 年西澳大利亚的死产:产妇迁移和族裔出身的影响。
Med J Aust. 2018 Nov 5;209(9):394-400. doi: 10.5694/mja18.00362. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
7
A Population-Based Matched-Sibling Analysis Estimating the Associations Between First Interpregnancy Interval and Birth Outcomes.基于人群的匹配同胞分析估计首次妊娠间隔与出生结局之间的关联。
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Jan 1;188(1):9-16. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwy188.
8
Why we miss fetal growth restriction: Identification of risk factors for severely growth-restricted fetuses remaining undelivered by 40 weeks gestation.为何我们会漏诊胎儿生长受限:孕40周时仍未分娩的严重生长受限胎儿的危险因素识别。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Dec;58(6):674-680. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12818. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
9
Evidence-based national guidelines for the management of suspected fetal growth restriction: comparison, consensus, and controversy.循证国家指南管理疑似胎儿生长受限:比较,共识和争议。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2S):S855-S868. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.004.
10
Customized vs INTERGROWTH-21 standards for the assessment of birthweight and stillbirth risk at term.定制标准与 INTERGROWTH-21 标准在评估足月出生体重和死胎风险中的比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2S):S692-S699. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.013.