Discipline of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, South Australia, Australia.
School of Psychology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
ANZ J Surg. 2022 Nov;92(11):2868-2872. doi: 10.1111/ans.18012. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
There are limited opportunities for surgeons to engage in active learning programs once they achieve Fellowship, especially for non-technical skills such as communication. This study aims to address this gap by evaluating a peer-based coaching program in non-technical skill using video-recorded patient consultations from a routine outpatient clinic.
Standard outpatient consultations between consultant surgeons and patients were video recorded. The surgeon viewed the videos with a peer-coach (senior surgeon) who helped identify areas of strength and areas for improvement. To test the effect of the coaching session, outpatient consultations were recorded roughly 1 month later. Pre and post-coaching videos were assessed using the Maastricht History-Taking and Advice Scoring - Global Rating List (MAAS), a common tool for evaluating non-technical skills in clinicians.
A total of 12 surgeons consented to participate. Coaching significantly improved MAAS scores (mean difference = -0.61; 95% CI (-0.88, -0.33); P < 0.0001). Surgeons were generally positive about the experience. All found the method of learning suitable, and most thought the process improved their skills. Most thought that coaching would improve patient outcomes and the majority thought they would participate in ongoing coaching as part of their employment.
This supports the concept of surgical coaching as an effective tool to improve communication skills and the quality of surgical consultation. The next step is to expand beyond a voluntary cohort and link surgical coaching to improved patient outcomes.
外科医生在获得专科医师资格后,很少有机会参加主动学习项目,特别是对于沟通等非技术技能。本研究旨在通过评估基于同行的非技术技能辅导计划来解决这一差距,该计划使用常规门诊诊所的患者咨询视频记录。
标准的顾问外科医生和患者之间的门诊咨询进行了视频录制。外科医生与同行教练(资深外科医生)一起观看视频,帮助识别优势领域和需要改进的领域。为了测试辅导课程的效果,大约在辅导后 1 个月记录门诊咨询。使用评估临床医生非技术技能的常用工具——马斯特里赫特病史采集和建议评分-全球评分表(MAAS),对辅导前后的视频进行评估。
共有 12 名外科医生同意参与。辅导显著提高了 MAAS 评分(平均差异=-0.61;95%置信区间[-0.88,-0.33];P<0.0001)。外科医生对这一体验普遍持肯定态度。所有人都认为这种学习方法合适,大多数人认为该过程提高了他们的技能。大多数人认为辅导将改善患者的预后,大多数人认为他们将作为其就业的一部分参与持续的辅导。
这支持了外科辅导作为一种有效工具,可以提高沟通技能和外科咨询质量的理念。下一步是将其从自愿参与扩展到更广泛的群体,并将外科辅导与改善患者预后联系起来。