• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

常规阿片类药物使用的流行病学及其与死亡率的关联:对466486名英国生物银行参与者的前瞻性队列研究。

The epidemiology of regular opioid use and its association with mortality: Prospective cohort study of 466 486 UK biobank participants.

作者信息

Macfarlane Gary J, Beasley Marcus, Jones Gareth T, Stannard Cathy

机构信息

Epidemiology Group and Aberdeen Centre for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Health, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD United Kingdom.

NHS Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group, Brockworth, Gloucestershire, GL3 4FE United Kingdom.

出版信息

EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Apr 18;21:100321. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100321. eCollection 2020 Apr.

DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100321
PMID:32322808
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7170951/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Opioids have, at most, small benefits for non-cancer pain in the medium and long-term but there is good evidence that they cause harm. The current study describes the characteristics and clinical status of people taking regular opioids in Great Britain and determines whether use is associated with mortality risk.

METHODS

An analysis of participants in UK Biobank, a prospective population-based study. At recruitment (2006-10) participants reported medicines which they regularly used in addition to lifestyle and health-related factors. Information was available on deaths until October 2016.

FINDINGS

There were 466 486 participants (54% women) aged 40-69 years and without a prior history of cancer of whom 5.5% were regularly using opioids. Use increased with age-group, was more common in females (6.3% v. 4.6%) and 87% of persons using them reported chronic pain. The highest rates of use (~1 in 9) were in people with low household income, who left school <16 years and lived in areas with high deprivation. Amongst 15,032 people who could not work because of ill-health, 1 in 3 were regularly taking opioids. Regular users reported insomnia (88.7%), a recent major recent life event (57.3%) and were much more likely than non-users to rate their health as poor (RR 5.5, 99% CI (4.9, 6.1)). Those taking weak (4.2% of participants) or strong (1.4%) opioids were more likely to die during follow-up (6.9% and 9.1% respectively v. 3.3% in non-users) an excess which remained after adjustment for demographic, socio-economic, health and lifestyle factors (MRR 1.18 99% CI (1.06, 1.32) and 1.20 99% CI (1.01, 1.43)) respectively.

INTERPRETATION

Regular use of opioids is common in Great Britain, particularly in groups of low socio-economic status. Most users still report chronic pain, poor health generally and are at increased risk of premature death although it is not established that this relationship is causal.

FUNDING

There were no external sources of funding obtained for the current analyses.

摘要

背景

阿片类药物对非癌性疼痛的中长期益处至多微乎其微,但有充分证据表明它们会造成伤害。本研究描述了英国定期服用阿片类药物人群的特征和临床状况,并确定使用阿片类药物是否与死亡风险相关。

方法

对英国生物银行的参与者进行分析,这是一项基于人群的前瞻性研究。在招募阶段(2006 - 2010年),参与者报告了他们定期使用的药物以及生活方式和健康相关因素。可获取截至2016年10月的死亡信息。

研究结果

共有466486名年龄在40 - 69岁且无癌症病史的参与者(54%为女性),其中5.5%的人定期使用阿片类药物。使用率随年龄组增加,在女性中更常见(6.3%对4.6%),87%使用阿片类药物的人报告有慢性疼痛。使用率最高的人群(约九分之一)是家庭收入低、16岁前辍学且生活在贫困程度高的地区的人。在15032名因健康不佳而无法工作的人中,三分之一的人定期服用阿片类药物。定期使用者报告有失眠(88.7%)、近期有重大生活事件(57.3%),并且他们将自己的健康状况评为差的可能性比非使用者高得多(相对风险5.5,99%置信区间(4.9,6.1))。服用弱阿片类药物(占参与者的4.2%)或强阿片类药物(1.4%)的人在随访期间死亡的可能性更高(分别为6.9%和9.1%,而非使用者为3.3%),在对人口统计学、社会经济、健康和生活方式因素进行调整后,这种差异仍然存在(多变量相对风险分别为1.18,99%置信区间(1.06,1.32)和1.20,99%置信区间(1.01,1.43))。

解读

在英国,定期使用阿片类药物很常见,尤其是在社会经济地位较低的群体中。大多数使用者仍报告有慢性疼痛、总体健康状况不佳且过早死亡风险增加,尽管尚未确定这种关系是因果关系。

资金来源

本次分析未获得外部资金来源。

相似文献

1
The epidemiology of regular opioid use and its association with mortality: Prospective cohort study of 466 486 UK biobank participants.常规阿片类药物使用的流行病学及其与死亡率的关联:对466486名英国生物银行参与者的前瞻性队列研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Apr 18;21:100321. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100321. eCollection 2020 Apr.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Florida Controlled Substance Prescribing佛罗里达州受管制物质处方开具
5
NP Safe Prescribing of Controlled Substances While Avoiding Drug Diversion安全开具管制药品处方,同时避免药物转移
6
Higher ratio of plasma omega-6/omega-3 fatty acids is associated with greater risk of all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular mortality: A population-based cohort study in UK Biobank.血浆ω-6/ω-3 脂肪酸比值与全因、癌症和心血管死亡率风险增加相关:英国生物库的一项基于人群的队列研究。
Elife. 2024 Apr 5;12:RP90132. doi: 10.7554/eLife.90132.
7
Time trends and prescribing patterns of opioid drugs in UK primary care patients with non-cancer pain: A retrospective cohort study.英国初级保健中患有非癌性疼痛的患者的阿片类药物的时间趋势和处方模式:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2020 Oct 15;17(10):e1003270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003270. eCollection 2020 Oct.
8
The effect of socioeconomic deprivation on the association between an extended measurement of unhealthy lifestyle factors and health outcomes: a prospective analysis of the UK Biobank cohort.社会经济剥夺对不健康生活方式因素的广泛测量与健康结果之间关联的影响:对英国生物库队列的前瞻性分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2018 Dec;3(12):e576-e585. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30200-7. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
9
Causes of death among people who used illicit opioids in England, 2001-18: a matched cohort study.2001-2018 年英格兰滥用非法阿片类药物人群的死因:一项匹配队列研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 Feb;7(2):e126-e135. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00254-1. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Associations Between Common Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis Treatments and All-Cause Mortality.常见髋膝关节骨关节炎治疗方法与全因死亡率之间的关联
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Sep 5;13(17):2229. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13172229.
2
Associations of pain phenotypes and pain relief medications with stroke and its subtypes: a prospective cohort study.疼痛表型及疼痛缓解药物与中风及其亚型的关联:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21640. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04238-3.
3
Opioid use and the risk of cancer incidence and mortality: a systematic review.阿片类药物的使用与癌症发病率和死亡率风险:一项系统综述。
Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2025 Jun 11;44(2):54. doi: 10.1007/s10555-025-10268-0.
4
Kappa and Mu Opioid Receptors in Chronic Cough: Current Evidence and Future Treatment.慢性咳嗽中的κ和μ阿片受体:当前证据与未来治疗
Lung. 2025 May 13;203(1):62. doi: 10.1007/s00408-025-00812-8.
5
Difficulties with prescribed opioids: a cross-sectional survey of primary care patients in England, United Kingdom.处方阿片类药物的使用困难:对英国英格兰初级保健患者的横断面调查
Pain Rep. 2025 Feb 25;10(2):e1246. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001246. eCollection 2025 Apr.
6
Prevalence of and risk factors associated with chronic opioid use after traumatic injury: A historical cohort study using the Korean National Health Insurance Service sample cohort data.创伤后慢性阿片类药物使用的流行情况及相关风险因素:一项使用韩国国家健康保险服务样本队列数据的回顾性队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Nov 29;103(48):e40664. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040664.
7
Association between prescription drugs and all-cause mortality risk in the UK population.英国人群中处方药与全因死亡风险之间的关联。
Aging Cell. 2024 Dec;23(12):e14334. doi: 10.1111/acel.14334. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
8
Comparative analysis of adverse event risks in breast cancer patients receiving pembrolizumab combined with paclitaxel paclitaxel monotherapy: insights from the FAERS database.接受帕博利珠单抗联合紫杉醇与紫杉醇单药治疗的乳腺癌患者不良事件风险的比较分析:来自FAERS数据库的见解
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Aug 21;15:1345671. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1345671. eCollection 2024.
9
Changes in opioid prescribing during the COVID-19 pandemic in England: an interrupted time-series analysis in the OpenSAFELY-TTP cohort.英格兰在 COVID-19 大流行期间阿片类药物处方的变化:在 OpenSAFELY-TTP 队列中的一项中断时间序列分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2024 Jul;9(7):e432-e442. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00100-2.
10
Big data, big consortia, and pain: UK Biobank, PAINSTORM, and DOLORisk.大数据、大型联盟与疼痛:英国生物银行、PAINSTORM和DOLORisk
Pain Rep. 2023 Aug 10;8(5):e1086. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001086. eCollection 2023 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Tramadol With All-Cause Mortality Among Patients With Osteoarthritis.曲马多与骨关节炎患者全因死亡率的相关性。
JAMA. 2019 Mar 12;321(10):969-982. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.1347.
2
Opioid prescribing trends and geographical variation in England, 1998-2018: a retrospective database study.1998 - 2018年英格兰阿片类药物处方趋势及地理差异:一项回顾性数据库研究
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;6(2):140-150. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30471-1. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
3
Opioids for Chronic Noncancer Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.慢性非癌痛阿片类药物治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2018 Dec 18;320(23):2448-2460. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.18472.
4
Association of opioid prescribing practices with chronic pain and benzodiazepine co-prescription: a primary care data linkage study.阿片类药物处方实践与慢性疼痛和苯二氮䓬类药物共同处方的关联:一项初级保健数据链接研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Jun;120(6):1345-1355. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.02.022. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
5
Opioids for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: Mistakes Made, Lessons Learned, and Future Directions.用于治疗慢性疼痛的阿片类药物:所犯错误、汲取的教训及未来方向。
Anesth Analg. 2017 Nov;125(5):1769-1778. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002500.
6
Defining chronic pain in epidemiological studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.在流行病学研究中定义慢性疼痛:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pain. 2017 Nov;158(11):2092-2107. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001009.
7
Persons with chronic widespread pain experience excess mortality: longitudinal results from UK Biobank and meta-analysis.慢性广泛性疼痛患者的死亡率过高:来自英国生物库的纵向研究结果和荟萃分析。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Nov;76(11):1815-1822. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211476. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
8
Comparison of Sociodemographic and Health-Related Characteristics of UK Biobank Participants With Those of the General Population.英国生物银行参与者与普通人群的社会人口学特征及健康相关特征比较。
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Nov 1;186(9):1026-1034. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx246.
9
Low back pain and sciatica: summary of NICE guidance.腰痛与坐骨神经痛:英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所指南摘要
BMJ. 2017 Jan 6;356:i6748. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6748.
10
EULAR revised recommendations for the management of fibromyalgia.EULAR 修订的纤维肌痛管理建议。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Feb;76(2):318-328. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209724. Epub 2016 Jul 4.