• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视觉厌恶诱因会产生一种注意瞬脱,且与情境和特质层面的病原体回避无关。

Visual disgust elicitors produce an attentional blink independent of contextual and trait-level pathogen avoidance.

作者信息

Perone Paola, Becker D Vaughn, Tybur Joshua M

机构信息

Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology.

Department of Cognitive Science and Engineering.

出版信息

Emotion. 2021 Jun;21(4):871-880. doi: 10.1037/emo0000751. Epub 2020 Apr 23.

DOI:10.1037/emo0000751
PMID:32324005
Abstract

Multiple studies report that disgust-eliciting stimuli are perceived as salient and subsequently capture selective attention. In the current study, we aimed to better understand the nature of temporal attentional biases toward disgust-eliciting stimuli and to investigate the extent to which these biases are sensitive to contextual and trait-level pathogen avoidance motives. Participants (N = 116) performed in an emotional attentional blink task in which task-irrelevant disgust-eliciting, fear-eliciting, or neutral images preceded a target by 200, 500, or 800 ms (i.e., lag 2, 5 and 8, respectively). They did so twice-once while not exposed to an odor and once while exposed to either an odor that elicited disgust or an odor that did not-and completed a measure of disgust sensitivity. Results indicate that disgust-eliciting visual stimuli produced a greater attentional blink than neutral visual stimuli at lag 2 and a greater attentional blink than fear-eliciting visual stimuli at both lag 2 and at lag 5. Neither the odor manipulations nor individual differences measures moderated this effect. We propose that visual attention is engaged for a longer period of time following disgust-eliciting stimuli because covert processes automatically initiate the evaluation of pathogen threats. The fact that state and trait pathogen avoidance do not influence this temporal attentional bias suggests that early attentional processing of pathogen cues is initiated independent from the context in which such cues are perceived. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

多项研究报告称,引发厌恶的刺激被视为显著刺激,随后会吸引选择性注意。在本研究中,我们旨在更好地理解对引发厌恶刺激的时间性注意偏差的本质,并调查这些偏差对情境和特质层面的病原体回避动机的敏感程度。参与者(N = 116)进行了一项情绪性注意瞬脱任务,在该任务中,与任务无关的引发厌恶、引发恐惧或中性的图像在目标出现前200、500或800毫秒出现(即分别为滞后2、5和8)。他们在两种情况下进行该任务——一次是在未接触气味时,另一次是在接触引发厌恶的气味或未引发厌恶的气味时——并完成了一项厌恶敏感性测量。结果表明,在滞后2时,引发厌恶的视觉刺激比中性视觉刺激产生更大的注意瞬脱,在滞后2和滞后5时,引发厌恶的视觉刺激比引发恐惧的视觉刺激产生更大的注意瞬脱。气味操纵和个体差异测量均未调节这种效应。我们提出,在引发厌恶的刺激之后,视觉注意会被占用更长时间,因为隐蔽过程会自动启动对病原体威胁的评估。状态和特质层面的病原体回避不影响这种时间性注意偏差这一事实表明,病原体线索的早期注意加工是独立于感知此类线索的情境而启动的。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》(c)2021美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
Visual disgust elicitors produce an attentional blink independent of contextual and trait-level pathogen avoidance.视觉厌恶诱因会产生一种注意瞬脱,且与情境和特质层面的病原体回避无关。
Emotion. 2021 Jun;21(4):871-880. doi: 10.1037/emo0000751. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
2
Emotional modulation of attention: fear increases but disgust reduces the attentional blink.情绪对注意的调节:恐惧增强但厌恶减少注意瞬脱。
PLoS One. 2009 Nov 19;4(11):e7924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007924.
3
Emotion modulation of visual attention: categorical and temporal characteristics.情绪调节视觉注意:类别和时间特征。
PLoS One. 2010 Nov 5;5(11):e13860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013860.
4
Emotional induced attentional blink in trauma-exposed veterans: associations with trauma specific and nonspecific symptoms.创伤后暴露老兵的情绪诱发注意瞬脱:与创伤特异性和非特异性症状的关联。
J Anxiety Disord. 2022 Apr;87:102541. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2022.102541. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
5
Time course of attentional bias in social anxiety: The effects of spatial frequencies and individual threats.社交焦虑中注意力偏向的时程变化:空间频率和个体威胁的影响。
Psychophysiology. 2020 Sep;57(9):e13617. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13617. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
6
Effects of vicarious disgust learning on the development of fear, disgust, and attentional biases in children.替代性厌恶学习对儿童恐惧、厌恶和注意力偏见发展的影响。
Emotion. 2019 Oct;19(7):1268-1283. doi: 10.1037/emo0000511. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
7
Emotional induced attentional blink in obsessive-compulsive disorder.强迫症的情绪诱发注意瞬脱。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Mar 15;283:101-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.12.204. Epub 2021 Jan 24.
8
We prefer what we fear: A response preference bias mimics attentional capture in spider fear.我们偏好我们所恐惧的事物:一种反应偏好偏差模仿了蜘蛛恐惧中的注意力捕获。
J Anxiety Disord. 2018 Jan;53:30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
9
Differential response patterns to disgust-related pictures.对厌恶相关图片的差异反应模式。
Cogn Emot. 2018 Dec;32(8):1678-1690. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2017.1423040. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
10
Attentional Bias Differences between Fear and Disgust: Implications for the Role of Disgust in Disgust-Related Anxiety Disorders.恐惧与厌恶之间的注意偏向差异:厌恶在与厌恶相关的焦虑症中的作用启示
Cogn Emot. 2009 Jun;23(4):675-687. doi: 10.1080/02699930802051599.

引用本文的文献

1
Disgust-induced attentional blink at Lag3: a diagnostic and therapeutic approach to depression.厌恶引发的Lag3注意瞬脱:抑郁症的一种诊断和治疗方法。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 2;16:1569746. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1569746. eCollection 2025.
2
Individual differences in emotion-induced blindness: Are they reliable and what do they measure?情绪诱导盲视的个体差异:它们是否可靠,以及它们测量的是什么?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jul;86(5):1-15. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02900-y. Epub 2024 May 17.
3
The psychological costs of behavioral immunity following COVID-19 diagnosis.
新冠病毒诊断后的行为免疫的心理代价。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 30;14(1):9899. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59408-6.
4
Body odor disgust sensitivity (BODS) is related to extreme odor valence perception.体臭厌恶敏感度(BODS)与极端气味效价感知有关。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 21;18(4):e0284397. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284397. eCollection 2023.
5
Is Generation Z Ready to Engage in Entomophagy? A Segmentation Analysis Study.Z 世代准备好参与食虫了吗?一项细分分析研究。
Nutrients. 2023 Jan 19;15(3):525. doi: 10.3390/nu15030525.
6
Psychosocial Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening Intention: An Experiment on the Invitation Letter.结直肠癌筛查意愿的社会心理预测因素:邀请信实验
Int J Behav Med. 2023 Dec;30(6):867-877. doi: 10.1007/s12529-022-10142-1. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
7
COVID-19 and Memory: A Novel Contamination Effect in Memory.COVID-19 和记忆:记忆中的新型污染效应。
Evol Psychol. 2022 Apr-Jun;20(2):14747049221108929. doi: 10.1177/14747049221108929.
8
Don't look now! Emotion-induced blindness: The interplay between emotion and attention.别东张西望!情绪诱导的盲视:情绪与注意力的相互作用。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Nov;84(8):2741-2761. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02525-z. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
9
What Role Does Pathogen-Avoidance Psychology Play in Pandemics?病原体规避心理学在大流行中扮演什么角色?
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 Mar;25(3):177-186. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.11.008. Epub 2020 Nov 26.