School of Law and Business, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430205, China.
Research Center for Resources and Environmental Economics, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 20;17(8):2823. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082823.
This paper is the first to systematically review the theoretical mechanisms of environmental regulation and trade comparative advantage that affect the green transformation and upgrading of the manufacturing industry. On this basis, corresponding hypotheses are put forward. The non-radial and non-angle SBM (slacks-based measure) efficiency measurement model with undesirable outputs was used, combined with the use of the ML (green total factor productivity index) productivity index to measure green total factor productivity. Finally, the theoretical hypothesis was empirically tested using data from 27 manufacturing industries in China from 2005 to 2017. The results show the following: (1) There is a significant inverted U-shaped curve relationship between environmental regulation and the transformation of the manufacturing industry. In other words, as environmental regulation increases, its impact on the transformation and upgrading of the manufacturing industry is first promoted and then suppressed. (2) When there are no environmental regulations, the trade comparative advantage of the manufacturing industry is not conducive to industrial transformation. However, under the constraints of environmental regulations, the comparative advantage of trade will significantly promote the green transformation and upgrading of manufacturing. Therefore, in order to effectively promote transformation and upgrading of the manufacturing, this paper proposes the following policy recommendations: (1) The Chinese government should pay more attention to the impact of environmental regulation intensity on the transformation of manufacturing industries, further increase the intensity of environmental regulation within the reasonable range, and fully exert the positive effects of environmental regulation on the trade patterns and manufacturing industry transformation. (2) We should further optimize the structure of trade, realize the diversification of manufacturing import and export, and promote its transformation into high-end manufacturing. On this basis, green production technology in the manufacturing industry can be improved through the technology spillover effect. (3) Efforts should be made to improve the level of collaborative development between environmental regulation and trade patterns and to explore the transformation path of the manufacturing industry with the integration of environmental regulation and trade patterns.
这篇论文首次系统地回顾了影响制造业绿色转型和升级的环境规制和贸易比较优势的理论机制。在此基础上,提出了相应的假设。采用了非径向和非角度的 SBM(基于松弛的测度)效率测度模型,同时结合使用 ML(绿色全要素生产率指数)生产率指数来衡量绿色全要素生产率。最后,利用中国 27 个制造业 2005-2017 年的数据对理论假设进行了实证检验。结果表明:(1)环境规制与制造业转型之间存在显著的倒 U 型曲线关系。也就是说,随着环境规制的增加,其对制造业转型和升级的影响先是促进,然后是抑制。(2)在没有环境规制的情况下,制造业的贸易比较优势不利于产业转型。然而,在环境规制的约束下,贸易的比较优势将显著促进制造业的绿色转型和升级。因此,为了有效促进制造业的转型和升级,本文提出了以下政策建议:(1)中国政府应更加关注环境规制强度对制造业转型的影响,在合理范围内进一步加大环境规制强度,充分发挥环境规制对贸易模式和制造业转型的积极作用。(2)进一步优化贸易结构,实现制造业进出口的多元化,推动制造业向高端制造业转型。在此基础上,可以通过技术溢出效应提高制造业的绿色生产技术水平。(3)努力提高环境规制与贸易模式协同发展水平,探索环境规制与贸易模式融合的制造业转型路径。