Nakano Yuki, Kusunoki Kazutaka, Hoekenga Owen A, Tanaka Keisuke, Iuchi Satoshi, Sakata Yoichi, Kobayashi Masatomo, Yamamoto Yoshiharu Y, Koyama Hiroyuki, Kobayashi Yuriko
Faculty of Applied Biological Sciences, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan.
Cayuga Genetics Consulting Group LLC, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Apr 9;11:405. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00405. eCollection 2020.
Under acid soil conditions, Al stress and proton stress can occur, reducing root growth and function. However, these stressors are distinct, and tolerance to each is governed by multiple physiological processes. To better understand the genes that underlie these coincidental but experimentally separable stresses, a genome-wide association study (GWAS) and genomic prediction (GP) models were created for approximately 200 diverse accessions. GWAS and genomic prediction identified 140/160 SNPs associated with Al and proton tolerance, respectively, which explained approximately 70% of the variance observed. Reverse genetics of the genes in loci identified novel Al and proton tolerance genes, including () and (), as well as genes known to be associated with tolerance, such as the Al-activated malate transporter, . Additionally, variation in Al tolerance was partially explained by expression level polymorphisms of and caused by cis-regulatory allelic variation. These results suggest that we successfully identified the loci that regulate Al and proton tolerance. Furthermore, very small numbers of loci were shared by Al and proton tolerance as determined by the GWAS. There were substantial differences between the phenotype predicted by genomic prediction and the observed phenotype for Al tolerance. This suggested that the GWAS-undetectable genetic factors (e.g., rare-allele mutations) contributing to the variation of tolerance were more important for Al tolerance than for proton tolerance. This study provides important new insights into the genetic architecture that produces variation in the tolerance of acid soil.
在酸性土壤条件下,会出现铝胁迫和质子胁迫,从而抑制根系生长并影响其功能。然而,这些胁迫因素是不同的,对每种胁迫的耐受性受多种生理过程控制。为了更好地理解这些同时存在但在实验中可分离的胁迫背后的基因,针对约200个不同的种质创建了全基因组关联研究(GWAS)和基因组预测(GP)模型。GWAS和基因组预测分别鉴定出140/160个与铝耐受性和质子耐受性相关的单核苷酸多态性(SNP),这些SNP解释了约70%观察到的变异。对这些位点中的基因进行反向遗传学研究,发现了新的铝耐受性和质子耐受性基因,包括()和(),以及已知与耐受性相关的基因,如铝激活的苹果酸转运蛋白。此外,铝耐受性的变异部分可由顺式调控等位基因变异导致的和的表达水平多态性来解释。这些结果表明我们成功鉴定出了调控铝耐受性和质子耐受性的位点。此外,通过GWAS确定,铝耐受性和质子耐受性共有的位点非常少。基因组预测所预测的铝耐受性表型与观察到的表型之间存在显著差异。这表明对耐受性变异有贡献的GWAS检测不到的遗传因素(如稀有等位基因突变)对铝耐受性比对质子耐受性更重要。这项研究为导致酸性土壤耐受性变异的遗传结构提供了重要的新见解。