Suppr超能文献

产科肛门括约肌撕裂后的分娩。

Delivery after an obstetric anal sphincter tear.

机构信息

The Norwegian Continence and Pelvic Floor Center, University Hospital of North Norway, P.O. Box 96, 9038, Tromsø, Norway.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsingborg Hospital, Lund's University, Helsingborg, Sweden.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Jun;301(6):1479-1484. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05550-1. Epub 2020 Apr 23.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The present study aimed to assess the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) of a subsequent delivery after the previous OASIS in countries with low (Finland) and high rates (Norway and Sweden) of OASIS.

METHODS

This population-based case-control study included women who experienced OASIS 1997-2002. 26,598 women with OASIS were included from countries with low (Finland) and high (Norway and Sweden) OASIS incidences. Each case was matched with one background-adjusted control without OASIS. A follow-up data, including all subsequent deliveries between 1998 and 2011 were then collected. Statistics significances were calculated using chi-square test, test for relative proportions and Students t test, where appropriate.

RESULTS

OASIS in the first birth was associated with increased recurrences in subsequent births, 6.9% vs. 1.7% in Norway (p < 0.001); 4.5% vs. 0.7 (p < 0.001) in Sweden; and 2.1% vs. 0.8% in Finland (p = 0.038). In Norway, more than two deliveries occurred in 4.8% of cases and 6.2% of controls (p = 0.001), 4.2% vs. 5.1% in Sweden (p < 0.001), and 5.7% vs. 6.3% in Finland (p = 0.572). For women with OASIS in a previous delivery, the rates of cesarean deliveries in subsequent pregnancies were 16.4% (7.9% for controls) in Norway, and 16.3% (6.0% for controls) in Sweden, and 50.2% (14.2% for controls) in Finland. In all countries, the differences between cases and controls were significant (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Next deliveries after OASIS are associated with increased frequency of new OASIS, more cesarean deliveries, and less subsequent deliveries in the high-risk population than women without previous OASIS.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASIS)发生率较低的国家(芬兰)和较高的国家(挪威和瑞典)中,前次 OASIS 后再次分娩发生 OASIS 的风险。

方法

本基于人群的病例对照研究纳入了 1997 年至 2002 年期间发生 OASIS 的女性。从 OASIS 发生率较低的国家(芬兰)和较高的国家(挪威和瑞典)中纳入了 26598 名 OASIS 患者。每个病例均与一名无 OASIS 的背景调整对照相匹配。然后收集了 1998 年至 2011 年期间所有后续分娩的随访数据。使用卡方检验、相对比例检验和学生 t 检验(适当情况下)计算统计学显著性。

结果

首次分娩中的 OASIS 与随后分娩中复发的风险增加相关,在挪威为 6.9%对 1.7%(p<0.001);在瑞典为 4.5%对 0.7%(p<0.001);在芬兰为 2.1%对 0.8%(p=0.038)。在挪威,4.8%的病例和 6.2%的对照者发生了两次以上分娩(p=0.001),在瑞典为 4.2%对 5.1%(p<0.001),在芬兰为 5.7%对 6.3%(p=0.572)。对于前次分娩中有 OASIS 的女性,随后妊娠中的剖宫产率在挪威为 16.4%(对照组为 7.9%),在瑞典为 16.3%(对照组为 6.0%),在芬兰为 50.2%(对照组为 14.2%)。在所有国家,病例与对照者之间的差异均具有统计学意义(p<0.001)。

结论

在前次 OASIS 后再次分娩与新 OASIS 的发生频率增加、更多的剖宫产分娩以及高危人群中随后分娩的次数减少相关,而与无前次 OASIS 的女性相比。

相似文献

1
Delivery after an obstetric anal sphincter tear.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Jun;301(6):1479-1484. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05550-1. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
2
Long-term anal incontinence after obstetric anal sphincter injury-does grade of tear matter?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2):232.e1-232.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.569. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
3
Risk of recurrence and subsequent delivery after obstetric anal sphincter injuries.
BJOG. 2012 Jan;119(1):62-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03150.x. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
4
Decreasing the incidence of anal sphincter tears in instrumental delivery in Hudiksvall, Sweden.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):8887-8891. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.2005574. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
5
Obstetric anal sphincter injury and incontinence 15-23 years after vaginal delivery.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016 Aug;95(8):941-7. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12898. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
6
Mode of delivery after obstetric anal sphincter injury.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Nov;194:7-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.07.019. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
7
Obstetric anal sphincter injuries-Maternal, fetal and sociodemographic risk factors: A retrospective register-based study.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Nov;101(11):1262-1268. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14425. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
9
Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury: To prolong or to vacuum?
Midwifery. 2016 Mar;34:178-182. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.11.012. Epub 2015 Nov 22.
10
Changing incidence of anal sphincter tears in four Nordic countries through the last decades.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 Sep;146(1):71-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.04.033. Epub 2009 May 30.

引用本文的文献

3
The effects of progesterone on the healing of obstetric anal sphincter damage in female rats.
Open Med (Wars). 2023 Sep 1;18(1):20230786. doi: 10.1515/med-2023-0786. eCollection 2023.
4
Correlation of anorectal symptoms and endoanal ultrasound findings after obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS).
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Sep;34(9):2241-2247. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05491-8. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
5
Risk of obstetric anal sphincter tear among primiparous women with a history of female genital mutilation, giving birth in Sweden.
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 30;17(12):e0279295. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279295. eCollection 2022.
6
Berlin survey on obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI).
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Oct;306(4):1117-1125. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06627-9. Epub 2022 Jun 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验