Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University "La Statale", Milan, Italy -
IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy -
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020 Jun;56(3):327-330. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06331-5. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
COVID-19 pandemic is creating collateral damage to outpatients, whose rehabilitation services have been disrupted in most of the European countries. Telemedicine has been advocated as a possible solution. This paper reports the contents of the third Italian Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (SIMFER) webinar on "experiences from the field" COVID-19 impact on rehabilitation ("Covinars"). It provides readily available, first-hand information about the application of telemedicine in rehabilitation. The experiences reported were very different for population (number and health conditions), interventions, professionals, service payment, and technologies used. Commonalities included the pushing need due to the emergency, previous experiences, and a dynamic research and innovation environment. Lights included feasibility, results, reduction of isolation, cost decrease, stimulation to innovation, satisfaction of patients, families, and professionals beyond the starting diffidence. Shadows included that telemedicine can integrate but will never substitute face-to-face rehabilitation base on the encounter among human beings; age, and technology barriers (devices absence, bad connection and human diffidence) have also been reported. Possible issues included privacy and informed consent, payments, cultural difficulties in understanding that telemedicine is a real rehabilitation intervention. There was a final agreement that this experience will be incorporated by participants in their future services: technology is ready, but the real challenge is to change PRM physicians' and patients' habits, while better specific regulation is warranted.
COVID-19 大流行对门诊患者造成了附带损害,在大多数欧洲国家,他们的康复服务都已中断。远程医疗被认为是一种可能的解决方案。本文报告了意大利物理医学与康复医学学会(SIMFER)第三次关于“疫情对康复的影响(Covinars)”的网络研讨会的内容,介绍了康复领域远程医疗应用的经验。它提供了有关康复远程医疗应用的现成的、第一手的信息。所报告的经验在人口(数量和健康状况)、干预措施、专业人员、服务支付和使用的技术方面差异很大。共同之处包括紧急情况下的迫切需求、先前的经验以及动态的研究和创新环境。亮点包括可行性、结果、隔离减少、成本降低、对创新的刺激、患者、家属和专业人员的满意度超出了最初的疑虑。缺点包括远程医疗虽然可以补充,但永远不能替代面对面的康复,因为它基于人与人之间的接触;还存在年龄和技术障碍(设备缺失、连接不良和人类的不信任)。可能存在的问题包括隐私和知情同意、支付、理解远程医疗是一种真正的康复干预措施的文化困难。与会者最终一致认为,将把这一经验纳入他们未来的服务中:技术已经就绪,但真正的挑战是改变物理医学与康复医学医师和患者的习惯,同时需要更好的具体监管。