Suppr超能文献

避免在密集型多柔比星-环磷酰胺和紫杉醇方案的紫杉醇部分使用培非格司亭预防:一项前瞻性研究。

Avoiding Peg-Filgrastim Prophylaxis During the Paclitaxel Portion of the Dose-Dense Doxorubicin-Cyclophosphamide and Paclitaxel Regimen: A Prospective Study.

机构信息

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.

Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jul 20;38(21):2390-2397. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02484. Epub 2020 Apr 24.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The use of growth factors adds considerable expense and some toxicity to adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy. We tested the feasibility and safety of omitting routine peg-filgrastim use during the paclitaxel portion of the dose-dense doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide-paclitaxel regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective, single-arm study in which patients 18 to 65 years of age who completed 4 cycles of dose-dense doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide for stage I-III breast cancer received paclitaxel 175 mg/m every 2 weeks. Peg-filgrastim was administered after paclitaxel only if patients had had febrile neutropenia in a prior cycle or at investigator discretion if patients had infections or treatment delays of > 1 week. Once a patient received peg-filgrastim, it was administered in all future cycles. The primary end point was the rate of paclitaxel completion within 7 weeks from cycle 1 day 1 to cycle 4 day 1. If ≥ 100 out of 125 patients completed 4 cycles of paclitaxel without dose delay, the regimen would be considered feasible.

RESULTS

The enrollment goal of 125 patients was met. Median age was 46 years (range, 21-65 years), and 112 patients (90% [95% CI, 83% to 94%]) completed dose-dense paclitaxel within 7 weeks. Omission of peg-filgrastim was not causally related to noncompletion of paclitaxel in any patients. The most common reasons for dose reduction or delays were nonhematologic. One patient experienced febrile neutropenia but was able to complete paclitaxel on time. Eight patients (6.4%) received peg-filgrastim during the trial. Overall, peg-filgrastim was administered in only 4.3% of paclitaxel cycles.

CONCLUSION

Omission of routine peg-filgrastim during dose-dense paclitaxel according to a prespecified algorithm seems to be safe and feasible and was associated with a 95.7% reduction in the use of peg-filgrastim relative to the current standard of care.

摘要

目的

生长因子的使用会给辅助乳腺癌化疗带来相当大的费用和一些毒性。我们测试了在密集型多柔比星-环磷酰胺-紫杉醇方案的紫杉醇部分省略常规培非格司亭使用的可行性和安全性。

患者和方法

这是一项前瞻性、单臂研究,18 至 65 岁的患者完成了 4 个周期的密集型多柔比星-环磷酰胺治疗 I 期至 III 期乳腺癌,然后每 2 周接受 175mg/m 的紫杉醇治疗。仅在患者在前一个周期中出现发热性中性粒细胞减少症或研究者酌情决定患者出现感染或治疗延迟> 1 周时,才在紫杉醇后给予培非格司亭。一旦患者接受了培非格司亭,在所有后续周期中都给予培非格司亭。主要终点是从第 1 周期第 1 天到第 4 周期第 1 天,在 7 周内完成紫杉醇治疗的患者比例。如果 125 名患者中有≥ 100 名患者在没有剂量延迟的情况下完成了 4 个周期的紫杉醇治疗,则该方案将被认为是可行的。

结果

达到了 125 名患者的入组目标。中位年龄为 46 岁(范围,21-65 岁),112 名患者(90%[95%CI,83%至 94%])在 7 周内完成了密集型紫杉醇治疗。在任何患者中,培非格司亭的省略都与紫杉醇治疗的非完成没有因果关系。剂量减少或延迟的最常见原因是非血液学原因。一名患者发生发热性中性粒细胞减少症,但能够按时完成紫杉醇治疗。8 名患者(6.4%)在试验期间接受了培非格司亭。总体而言,培非格司亭仅在 4.3%的紫杉醇周期中使用。

结论

根据预设算法在密集型紫杉醇治疗中省略常规培非格司亭似乎是安全可行的,与当前标准护理相比,培非格司亭的使用率降低了 95.7%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0833/7367545/79c0ceb77fc1/JCO.19.02484app1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验