• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Risk of hospitalization according to chemotherapy regimen in early-stage breast cancer.早期乳腺癌患者的化疗方案与住院风险。
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jul 1;32(19):2010-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.49.3676. Epub 2014 May 27.
2
Risk of Neutropenia-Related Hospitalization in Patients Who Received Colony-Stimulating Factors With Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer.接受化疗治疗乳腺癌的患者在接受集落刺激因子治疗后发生中性粒细胞减少相关住院的风险。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Nov 10;34(32):3872-3879. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.2899. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
3
Long-term outcomes after adjuvant treatment of sequential versus combination docetaxel with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in node-positive breast cancer: BCIRG-005 randomized trial.辅助治疗序贯与联合多西紫杉醇、阿霉素和环磷酰胺治疗淋巴结阳性乳腺癌的长期结果:BCIRG-005 随机试验。
Ann Oncol. 2016 Jun;27(6):1041-1047. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw098. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
4
A retrospective evaluation of chemotherapy dose intensity and supportive care for early-stage breast cancer in a curative setting.回顾性评估根治性治疗早期乳腺癌的化疗剂量强度和支持性护理。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Jun;139(3):863-72. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2582-2. Epub 2013 Jun 16.
5
Definitive results of a phase III adjuvant trial comparing three chemotherapy regimens in women with operable, node-positive breast cancer: the NSABP B-38 trial.III 期辅助试验比较三种化疗方案在可手术淋巴结阳性乳腺癌女性中的明确结果:NSABP B-38 试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Sep 10;31(26):3197-204. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.48.1275. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
6
Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor use and medical costs after initial adjuvant chemotherapy in older patients with early-stage breast cancer.老年早期乳腺癌患者初始辅助化疗后使用粒细胞集落刺激因子与医疗费用。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Feb 1;30(2):103-18. doi: 10.2165/11589440-000000000-00000.
7
Evaluation of anemia, neutropenia and skin toxicities in standard or dose-dense doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC)-paclitaxel or docetaxel adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.评估标准或剂量密集型阿霉素/环磷酰胺(AC)-紫杉醇或多西他赛辅助化疗中乳腺癌患者的贫血、中性粒细胞减少和皮肤毒性。
Ann Oncol. 2005 Feb;16(2):247-52. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdi058.
8
Phase II trial of doxorubicin/docetaxel/cyclophosphamide for locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer: results from NSABP trial BP-58.多柔比星/多西他赛/环磷酰胺用于局部晚期和转移性乳腺癌的II期试验:NSABP试验BP-58的结果
Clin Breast Cancer. 2002 Dec;3(5):333-40. doi: 10.3816/CBC.2002.n.036.
9
Impact of treatment regimen on acute care use during and after adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer.治疗方案对早期乳腺癌辅助化疗期间及之后急性护理使用情况的影响。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Aug;164(3):515-525. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4280-y. Epub 2017 May 10.
10
Efficacy of dose dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel versus conventional dose doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel or docetaxel in patients with node-positive breast cancer.剂量密集型阿霉素和环磷酰胺序贯紫杉醇与传统剂量阿霉素、环磷酰胺序贯紫杉醇或多西他赛治疗淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者的疗效比较
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(4):1471-7. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.4.1471.

引用本文的文献

1
Methodologic Approach to Defining Comorbidities in a Cohort of Patients With Cancer: An Example in the Optimal Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Dosing Study.在一组癌症患者中定义合并症的方法学探讨:以最佳乳腺癌化疗剂量研究为例。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2025 Feb;9:e2400231. doi: 10.1200/CCI-24-00231. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
2
Tailoring nonsurgical therapy for elderly patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A deep learning-based approach.基于深度学习的方法:为老年头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者定制非手术治疗。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Sep 13;103(37):e39659. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039659.
3
Triple-negative and Her2-positive breast cancer in women aged 70 and over: prognostic impact of age according to treatment.70岁及以上女性的三阴性和人表皮生长因子受体2阳性乳腺癌:年龄对治疗后预后的影响
Front Oncol. 2023 Dec 15;13:1287253. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1287253. eCollection 2023.
4
Falls prechemotherapy and toxicity-related hospitalization during adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in older women: Results from the prospective multicenter HOPE trial.老年女性乳腺癌辅助化疗期间化疗前跌倒及毒性相关住院情况:前瞻性多中心HOPE试验结果
Cancer. 2024 Mar 15;130(6):936-946. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35105. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
5
Geriatric assessment for older people with cancer: policy recommendations.老年人癌症评估:政策建议。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2023 Sep 1;8(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s41256-023-00323-0.
6
Predicting Acute Care Events Among Patients Initiating Chemotherapy: A Practice-Based Validation and Adaptation of the PROACCT Model.预测开始化疗的患者的急性护理事件:PROACCT 模型的基于实践的验证和改编。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2023 Aug;19(8):577-585. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00721. Epub 2023 May 22.
7
Evaluation of outcome of chemotherapy for breast cancer patients older than 70 years: A SEER-based study.70岁以上乳腺癌患者化疗结局评估:一项基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的研究
Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 28;13:992573. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.992573. eCollection 2023.
8
Toxicity risk score and clinical decline after adjuvant chemotherapy in older breast cancer survivors.辅助化疗后老年乳腺癌幸存者的毒性风险评分和临床恶化。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023 May 8;115(5):578-585. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djad029.
9
Nonsurgical Treatment Strategies for Elderly Head and Neck Cancer Patients: An Emerging Subject Worldwide.老年头颈癌患者的非手术治疗策略:全球一个新兴主题。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Nov 19;14(22):5689. doi: 10.3390/cancers14225689.
10
Chemotherapy-Induced Toxicities and Their Associations with Clinical and Non-Clinical Factors among Breast Cancer Patients in Vietnam.越南乳腺癌患者的化疗毒性及其与临床和非临床因素的关联。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Oct 31;29(11):8269-8284. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29110653.

本文引用的文献

1
Decline in the use of anthracyclines for breast cancer.蒽环类药物在乳腺癌治疗中的应用减少。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 20;30(18):2232-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.1273. Epub 2012 May 21.
2
Anthracycline regimen adherence in older patients with early breast cancer.蒽环类药物方案在老年早期乳腺癌患者中的依从性。
Oncologist. 2012;17(3):303-11. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0316. Epub 2012 Feb 27.
3
Effect of primary prophylactic G-CSF use on systemic therapy administration for elderly breast cancer patients.初级预防性 G-CSF 使用对老年乳腺癌患者全身治疗给药的影响。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Nov;130(1):255-66. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1553-8. Epub 2011 May 17.
4
Predicting individual risk of neutropenic complications in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy.预测接受癌症化疗患者中性粒细胞减少并发症的个体风险。
Cancer. 2011 May 1;117(9):1917-27. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25691. Epub 2010 Nov 29.
5
Effect of primary prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor use on incidence of neutropenia hospitalizations for elderly early-stage breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.初级预防性使用粒细胞集落刺激因子对接受化疗的老年早期乳腺癌患者中性粒细胞减少性住院发生率的影响。
Med Care. 2011 Jul;49(7):649-57. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318215c42e.
6
Can we abandon anthracyclines for early breast cancer patients?早期乳腺癌患者可以放弃蒽环类药物吗?
Oncology (Williston Park). 2011 Feb;25(2):115-24, 127.
7
Chemotherapy characteristics are important predictors of primary prophylactic CSF administration in older patients with breast cancer.化疗特点是预测老年乳腺癌患者行预防性鞘内注射脑脊液的重要指标。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Jun;127(2):511-20. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-1216-1. Epub 2010 Oct 26.
8
Cardiotoxicity of anthracycline agents for the treatment of cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.蒽环类抗癌药物的心脏毒性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2010 Jun 29;10:337. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-337.
9
Emergence of nonanthracycline regimens in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer.非蒽环类方案在乳腺癌辅助治疗中的出现。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Jan;119(1):25-32. doi: 10.1007/s10549-009-0567-y.
10
Role of anthracyclines in the treatment of early breast cancer.蒽环类药物在早期乳腺癌治疗中的作用。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Oct 1;27(28):4798-808. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.4791. Epub 2009 Aug 17.

早期乳腺癌患者的化疗方案与住院风险。

Risk of hospitalization according to chemotherapy regimen in early-stage breast cancer.

机构信息

All authors: The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jul 1;32(19):2010-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.49.3676. Epub 2014 May 27.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.2013.49.3676
PMID:24868022
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4164758/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the risk of hospitalization between patients with early-stage breast cancer who received different chemotherapy regimens.

PATIENT AND METHODS

We identified 3,567 patients older than age 65 years from the SEER/Texas Cancer Registry-Medicare database and 9,327 patients younger than age 65 years from the MarketScan database who were diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer between 2003 and 2007. The selection was nonrandomized and nonprospectively collected. We categorized patients according to the regimens they received: docetaxel (T) and cyclophosphamide (C), doxorubicin (A) and C, TAC, AC + T, dose-dense AC + paclitaxel (P) or AC + weekly P. We compared the rates of chemotherapy-related hospitalizations that occurred within 6 months of chemotherapy initiation and used multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify the factors associated with these hospitalizations.

RESULTS

Among patients younger than age 65 years, the hospitalization rates ranged from 6.2% (dose-dense AC + P) to 10.0% (TAC), and those who received TAC and AC + T had significantly higher rates of hospitalization than did patients who received TC. Among patients older than age 65 years, these rates ranged from 12.7% (TC) to 24.2% (TAC) and the rates of hospitalization of patients who received TAC, AC + T, AC, or AC + weekly P were higher than those of patients who received TC.

CONCLUSION

TAC and AC + T were associated with the highest risk of hospitalization in patients younger than age 65 years. Among patients older than age 65 years, all regimens (aside from dose-dense AC + P) were associated with a higher risk of hospitalization than TC. Results may be affected by selection biases where less aggressive regimens are offered to frailer patients.

摘要

目的

比较接受不同化疗方案的早期乳腺癌患者的住院风险。

方法

我们从 SEER/Texas 癌症登记处-医疗保险数据库中确定了 3567 名年龄大于 65 岁的患者,从 MarketScan 数据库中确定了 9327 名年龄小于 65 岁的患者,他们在 2003 年至 2007 年间被诊断为早期乳腺癌。选择是非随机和非前瞻性的。我们根据患者接受的方案对其进行分类:多西他赛(T)和环磷酰胺(C)、多柔比星(A)和 C、TAC、AC+T、密集型 AC+紫杉醇(P)或 AC+每周 P。我们比较了化疗开始后 6 个月内发生的与化疗相关的住院率,并使用多变量逻辑回归分析确定与这些住院率相关的因素。

结果

在年龄小于 65 岁的患者中,住院率从 6.2%(密集型 AC+P)到 10.0%(TAC)不等,接受 TAC 和 AC+T 的患者的住院率明显高于接受 TC 的患者。在年龄大于 65 岁的患者中,这些比率从 12.7%(TC)到 24.2%(TAC)不等,接受 TAC、AC+T、AC 或 AC+每周 P 的患者的住院率高于接受 TC 的患者。

结论

在年龄小于 65 岁的患者中,TAC 和 AC+T 与住院风险最高相关。在年龄大于 65 岁的患者中,所有方案(除了密集型 AC+P)与 TC 相比,住院风险更高。结果可能受到选择偏倚的影响,较不激进的方案被提供给体弱的患者。