• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良后的后问号切口与去骨瓣减压术后颅骨修补术感染率降低有关。

An altered posterior question-mark incision is associated with a reduced infection rate of cranioplasty after decompressive hemicraniectomy.

机构信息

1Department of Neurosurgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen; and.

2Department of Neurosurgery, Military Hospital Koblenz, Germany.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 2020 Apr 24;134(3):1262-1270. doi: 10.3171/2020.2.JNS193335. Print 2021 Mar 1.

DOI:10.3171/2020.2.JNS193335
PMID:32330877
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Performing a cranioplasty (CP) after decompressive craniotomy is a straightforward neurosurgical procedure, but it remains associated with a high complication rate. Surgical site infection (SSI), aseptic bone resorption (aBR), and need for a secondary CP are the most common complications. This observational study aimed to identify modifiable risk factors to prevent CP failure.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of all patients who underwent CP following decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) between 2010 and 2018 at a single institution. Predictors of SSI, aBR, and need for allograft CP were evaluated in a univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression model.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-six patients treated with CP after DHC were included. The diagnoses leading to a DHC were as follows: stroke (83 patients, 44.6%), traumatic brain injury (55 patients, 29.6%), subarachnoid hemorrhage (33 patients, 17.7%), and intracerebral hemorrhage (15 patients, 8.1%). Post-CP SSI occurred in 25 patients (13.4%), whereas aBR occurred in 32 cases (17.2%). An altered posterior question-mark incision, ending behind the ear, was associated with a significantly lower infection rate and CP failure, compared to the classic question-mark incision (6.3% vs 18.4%; p = 0.021). The only significant predictor of aBR was patient age, in which those developing resorption were on average 16 years younger than those without aBR (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The primary goal of this retrospective cohort analysis was to identify adjustable risk factors to prevent post-CP complications. In this analysis, a posterior question-mark incision proved beneficial regarding infection and CP failure. The authors believe that these findings are caused by the better vascularized skin flap due to preservation of the superficial temporal artery and partial preservation of the occipital artery. In this trial, the posterior question-mark incision was identified as an easily and costless adaptable technique to reduce CP failure rates.

摘要

目的

去骨瓣减压术后行颅骨修补术(CP)是一种简单的神经外科手术,但仍存在较高的并发症发生率。手术部位感染(SSI)、无菌性骨吸收(aBR)和需要二次 CP 是最常见的并发症。本观察性研究旨在确定可改变的风险因素以预防 CP 失败。

方法

对 2010 年至 2018 年期间在一家机构行 CP 治疗的所有去骨瓣减压术后患者进行回顾性分析。在单变量分析和多变量逻辑回归模型中评估 SSI、aBR 和同种异体 CP 需求的预测因素。

结果

共纳入 186 例 DHC 后行 CP 治疗的患者。导致 DHC 的诊断如下:中风(83 例,44.6%)、创伤性脑损伤(55 例,29.6%)、蛛网膜下腔出血(33 例,17.7%)和脑出血(15 例,8.1%)。25 例(13.4%)发生 CP 后 SSI,32 例(17.2%)发生 aBR。与经典问号切口相比,改变后的问号后切口(止于耳后)感染率和 CP 失败率显著降低(6.3%比 18.4%;p = 0.021)。aBR 的唯一显著预测因素是患者年龄,发生吸收的患者平均比未发生 aBR 的患者年轻 16 岁(p < 0.001)。

结论

本回顾性队列分析的主要目的是确定可调节的风险因素以预防 CP 后并发症。在这项分析中,问号后切口在感染和 CP 失败方面显示出了益处。作者认为,这是由于保留了颞浅动脉和部分保留枕动脉导致皮瓣血管化更好所致。在这项试验中,问号后切口被认为是一种简单且经济的可调节技术,可以降低 CP 失败率。

相似文献

1
An altered posterior question-mark incision is associated with a reduced infection rate of cranioplasty after decompressive hemicraniectomy.改良后的后问号切口与去骨瓣减压术后颅骨修补术感染率降低有关。
J Neurosurg. 2020 Apr 24;134(3):1262-1270. doi: 10.3171/2020.2.JNS193335. Print 2021 Mar 1.
2
Cranioplasty after decompressive hemicraniectomy: underestimated surgery-associated complications?减压性颅骨切除术后的颅骨成形术:手术相关并发症是否被低估?
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013 Aug;115(8):1293-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.12.002. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
3
Scalp incision technique for decompressive hemicraniectomy: comparative systematic review and meta-analysis of the reverse question mark versus alternative retroauricular and Kempe incision techniques.去骨瓣减压术的头皮切口技术:反向问号与其他耳后和 Kempe 切口技术的对比系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Feb 14;47(1):79. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02307-1.
4
Defining "early" cranioplasty to achieve lower complication rates of bone flap failure: resorption and infection.将“早期”颅骨修补术定义为降低骨瓣失败(吸收和感染)并发症发生率的手段。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2019 Jan;161(1):25-31. doi: 10.1007/s00701-018-3749-8. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
5
How I do it-the posterior question mark incision for decompressive hemicraniectomy.我是这样做的——减压性半颅骨切除术的后问号切口。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 May;163(5):1447-1450. doi: 10.1007/s00701-021-04812-4. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
6
Decompressive hemicraniectomy and cranioplasty using subcutaneously preserved autologous bone flaps versus synthetic implants: perioperative outcomes and cost analysis.去骨瓣减压术和使用皮下保存自体骨瓣与合成植入物的颅骨成形术:围手术期结果和成本分析。
J Neurosurg. 2022 Apr 29;137(6):1831-1838. doi: 10.3171/2022.3.JNS212637. Print 2022 Dec 1.
7
Craniectomy size and decompression of the temporal base using the altered posterior question-mark incision for decompressive hemicraniectomy.采用改良后的后问号切口行减压性半颅骨切除术时的颅骨切除术大小和颞底减压。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 14;13(1):11419. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37689-7.
8
Cryopreservation versus subcutaneous preservation of autologous bone flaps for cranioplasty: comparison of the surgical site infection and bone resorption rates.自体骨瓣用于颅骨成形术的冷冻保存与皮下保存:手术部位感染率和骨吸收率的比较
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014 Sep;124:85-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.06.029. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
9
Rapid closure technique in decompressive craniectomy.去骨瓣减压术中的快速闭合技术。
J Neurosurg. 2011 Apr;114(4):954-60. doi: 10.3171/2009.12.JNS091065. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
10
Cranioplasty and Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement after Decompressive Craniectomy: Staged Surgery Is Associated with Fewer Postoperative Complications.减压性颅骨切除术后颅骨成形术和脑室腹腔分流术:分期手术与较少的术后并发症相关。
World Neurosurg. 2015 Oct;84(4):1051-4. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.05.066. Epub 2015 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

1
The Question Mark Question: Wound Healing after Hemicraniectomy.问号问题:去骨瓣减压术后的伤口愈合
J Neurol Surg Rep. 2025 Apr 9;86(2):e77-e82. doi: 10.1055/a-2561-7951. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Comparative clinical impact of low-curvature and normal-curvature titanium mesh in cranioplasty: a retrospective analysis of patient outcomes.低曲率与正常曲率钛网在颅骨修补术中的临床对比影响:患者预后的回顾性分析
Front Surg. 2025 Feb 7;12:1438307. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1438307. eCollection 2025.
3
The role of autologous bone in cranioplasty. A systematic review of complications and risk factors by using stored bone.
自体骨在颅骨修补术中的作用。使用储存骨的并发症和风险因素的系统评价。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Nov 4;166(1):438. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06312-7.
4
Challenging frontiers in neuroplastic cranial reconstruction: addressing neurosurgical wound healing complications through interdisciplinary collaboration - an observational study.神经塑性颅重建的挑战前沿:通过跨学科合作解决神经外科研伤口愈合并发症 - 一项观察性研究。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Oct 29;166(1):432. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06328-z.
5
Scalp incision technique for decompressive hemicraniectomy: comparative systematic review and meta-analysis of the reverse question mark versus alternative retroauricular and Kempe incision techniques.去骨瓣减压术的头皮切口技术:反向问号与其他耳后和 Kempe 切口技术的对比系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Feb 14;47(1):79. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02307-1.
6
Craniectomy size and decompression of the temporal base using the altered posterior question-mark incision for decompressive hemicraniectomy.采用改良后的后问号切口行减压性半颅骨切除术时的颅骨切除术大小和颞底减压。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 14;13(1):11419. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37689-7.
7
Infection-related failure of autologous allogenic cranioplasty after decompressive hemicraniectomy - A systematic review and meta-analysis.减压性颅骨切除术后自体及异体颅骨成形术的感染相关失败——一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Brain Spine. 2023 May 12;3:101760. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2023.101760. eCollection 2023.
8
Novel retro-auricular myocutaneous hemicraniectomy flap: Technical note and cadaveric dissection.新型耳后肌皮去骨瓣开颅术皮瓣:技术说明及尸体解剖
World Neurosurg X. 2023 Mar 23;19:100174. doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2023.100174. eCollection 2023 Jul.
9
Decompressive Craniectomy in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: The Intensivist's Point of View.严重创伤性脑损伤中的减压性颅骨切除术:重症监护医生的观点。
Diseases. 2023 Jan 30;11(1):22. doi: 10.3390/diseases11010022.
10
Outcome and risk factors of complications after cranioplasty with polyetheretherketone and titanium mesh: A single-center retrospective study.聚醚醚酮和钛网颅骨修补术后并发症的结局及危险因素:一项单中心回顾性研究
Front Neurol. 2022 Sep 21;13:926436. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.926436. eCollection 2022.