• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我是这样做的——减压性半颅骨切除术的后问号切口。

How I do it-the posterior question mark incision for decompressive hemicraniectomy.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 May;163(5):1447-1450. doi: 10.1007/s00701-021-04812-4. Epub 2021 Mar 31.

DOI:10.1007/s00701-021-04812-4
PMID:33787968
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8053663/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) is a lifesaving procedure which every neurosurgeon should master early on. As indications for the procedure are growing, the number of patients eventually requiring skull reconstruction via cranioplasty also increases. The posterior question mark incision is a straightforward alternative to the classic trauma-flap and can easily be adopted. Some particularities exist one should consider beforehand and are discussed here in detail.

METHODS

Surgical steps, aids, and pitfalls are comprehensively discussed to prepare surgeons who wish to gain experience with this type of incision.

CONCLUSION

Due to the lower complication rate after cranioplasty, the posterior question mark incision has superseded the traditional pre-auricular starting anterior question mark incisions, in our department for the performance of decompressive hemicraniectomies.

摘要

背景

去骨瓣减压术(DHC)是一种救生程序,每个神经外科医生都应该尽早掌握。随着该手术适应证的增加,最终需要通过颅骨成形术进行颅骨重建的患者数量也在增加。后问号切口是经典创伤皮瓣的一种直接替代方法,并且易于采用。这里详细讨论了一些在手术前需要考虑的特殊性。

方法

全面讨论了手术步骤、辅助工具和陷阱,以帮助那些希望在这种切口类型上获得经验的外科医生。

结论

由于颅骨成形术后并发症发生率较低,后问号切口已取代传统的耳前起始的前问号切口,成为我们科室进行减压性半颅骨切除术的首选。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bcc/8053663/77444a76ffdb/701_2021_4812_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bcc/8053663/8a4633385fb1/701_2021_4812_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bcc/8053663/a46084cca565/701_2021_4812_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bcc/8053663/f0a051510c06/701_2021_4812_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bcc/8053663/77444a76ffdb/701_2021_4812_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bcc/8053663/8a4633385fb1/701_2021_4812_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bcc/8053663/a46084cca565/701_2021_4812_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bcc/8053663/f0a051510c06/701_2021_4812_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bcc/8053663/77444a76ffdb/701_2021_4812_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
How I do it-the posterior question mark incision for decompressive hemicraniectomy.我是这样做的——减压性半颅骨切除术的后问号切口。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 May;163(5):1447-1450. doi: 10.1007/s00701-021-04812-4. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
2
An altered posterior question-mark incision is associated with a reduced infection rate of cranioplasty after decompressive hemicraniectomy.改良后的后问号切口与去骨瓣减压术后颅骨修补术感染率降低有关。
J Neurosurg. 2020 Apr 24;134(3):1262-1270. doi: 10.3171/2020.2.JNS193335. Print 2021 Mar 1.
3
Craniectomy size and decompression of the temporal base using the altered posterior question-mark incision for decompressive hemicraniectomy.采用改良后的后问号切口行减压性半颅骨切除术时的颅骨切除术大小和颞底减压。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 14;13(1):11419. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37689-7.
4
Scalp incision technique for decompressive hemicraniectomy: comparative systematic review and meta-analysis of the reverse question mark versus alternative retroauricular and Kempe incision techniques.去骨瓣减压术的头皮切口技术:反向问号与其他耳后和 Kempe 切口技术的对比系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Feb 14;47(1):79. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02307-1.
5
Decompressive hemicraniectomy and cranioplasty using subcutaneously preserved autologous bone flaps versus synthetic implants: perioperative outcomes and cost analysis.去骨瓣减压术和使用皮下保存自体骨瓣与合成植入物的颅骨成形术:围手术期结果和成本分析。
J Neurosurg. 2022 Apr 29;137(6):1831-1838. doi: 10.3171/2022.3.JNS212637. Print 2022 Dec 1.
6
Commentary: The Retro-Auricular Incision as an Effective and Safe Alternative Incision for Decompressive Hemicraniectomy.评论:耳后切口作为减压性颅骨切除术有效且安全的替代切口
Oper Neurosurg. 2021 May 13;20(6):E398. doi: 10.1093/ons/opab054.
7
The Retroauricular Incision as an Effective and Safe Alternative Incision for Decompressive Hemicraniectomy.耳后切口作为减压性颅骨切除术的一种有效且安全的替代切口
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2021 May 13;20(6):549-558. doi: 10.1093/ons/opab021.
8
Decompressive craniectomy and cranioplasty: experience and outcomes in deployed UK military personnel.减压性颅骨切除术和颅骨修补术:英国现役军人的经验与结果
Br J Neurosurg. 2016 Oct;30(5):529-35. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2016.1208807. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
9
Comparison of Retroauricular and Reverse Question Mark Incisions for Decompressive Hemicraniectomy.耳后切口与反向问号切口在减压性大骨瓣开颅术中的比较
World Neurosurg. 2023 Sep;177:e66-e76. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.05.068. Epub 2023 May 24.
10
The Kempe incision for decompressive craniectomy, craniotomy, and cranioplasty in traumatic brain injury and stroke.用于创伤性脑损伤和中风的减压性颅骨切除术、开颅手术和颅骨成形术的肯佩切口。
J Neurosurg. 2021 May 21;135(6):1807-1816. doi: 10.3171/2020.11.JNS203567. Print 2021 Dec 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Biomaterials for Regenerative Cranioplasty: Current State of Clinical Application and Future Challenges.用于颅骨再生修复的生物材料:临床应用现状与未来挑战
J Funct Biomater. 2024 Mar 28;15(4):84. doi: 10.3390/jfb15040084.
2
Custom-made 3D printing-based cranioplasty using a silicone mould and PMMA.采用硅模具和聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)的定制 3D 打印颅骨修复术。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 25;13(1):11985. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38772-9.
3
Craniectomy size and decompression of the temporal base using the altered posterior question-mark incision for decompressive hemicraniectomy.

本文引用的文献

1
An altered posterior question-mark incision is associated with a reduced infection rate of cranioplasty after decompressive hemicraniectomy.改良后的后问号切口与去骨瓣减压术后颅骨修补术感染率降低有关。
J Neurosurg. 2020 Apr 24;134(3):1262-1270. doi: 10.3171/2020.2.JNS193335. Print 2021 Mar 1.
2
The impact of implant material and patient age on the long-term outcome of secondary cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury.种植体材料和患者年龄对严重颅脑创伤去骨瓣减压术后二次颅骨修补长期预后的影响。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Apr;162(4):745-753. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04243-7. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
3
采用改良后的后问号切口行减压性半颅骨切除术时的颅骨切除术大小和颞底减压。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 14;13(1):11419. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37689-7.
4
Infection-related failure of autologous allogenic cranioplasty after decompressive hemicraniectomy - A systematic review and meta-analysis.减压性颅骨切除术后自体及异体颅骨成形术的感染相关失败——一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Brain Spine. 2023 May 12;3:101760. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2023.101760. eCollection 2023.
5
Tissue Healing in Hemicraniectomy.颅骨切除术的组织愈合
Cureus. 2022 Sep 17;14(9):e29260. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29260. eCollection 2022 Sep.
6
Response to the letter to the editor "The posterior question mark incision for decompressive hemicraniectomy".对致编辑的信《减压性去骨瓣开颅术的后问号切口》的回复
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2022 Jun;164(6):1661-1662. doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05228-4. Epub 2022 May 2.
Complications of Decompressive Craniectomy.
减压性颅骨切除术的并发症
Front Neurol. 2018 Nov 20;9:977. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00977. eCollection 2018.
4
Randomized controlled study comparing 2 surgical techniques for decompressive craniectomy: with watertight duraplasty and without watertight duraplasty.随机对照研究比较了 2 种去骨瓣减压术的手术技术:硬脑膜严密修补和不严密修补。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Oct;129(4):1017-1023. doi: 10.3171/2017.4.JNS152954. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
5
Anatomy of the Ophthalmic Artery: A Review concerning Its Modern Surgical and Clinical Applications.眼动脉的解剖:关于其现代外科手术及临床应用的综述
Anat Res Int. 2015;2015:591961. doi: 10.1155/2015/591961. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
6
Rapid closure technique in decompressive craniectomy.去骨瓣减压术中的快速闭合技术。
J Neurosurg. 2011 Apr;114(4):954-60. doi: 10.3171/2009.12.JNS091065. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
7
The vascular territories (angiosomes) of the body: experimental study and clinical applications.人体的血管区域(血管体):实验研究与临床应用。
Br J Plast Surg. 1987 Mar;40(2):113-41. doi: 10.1016/0007-1226(87)90185-8.