Foster R J, Haley M R, Talbot I W, De Asha A R, Barnett C T
Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Tom Reilly Building, Byrom Street, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK.
Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Tom Reilly Building, Byrom Street, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK.
J Biomech. 2020 May 22;105:109785. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109785. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
Accurate foot placement is important for dynamic balance during activities of daily living. Disruption of sensory information and prosthetic componentry characteristics may result in increased locomotor task difficulty for individuals with lower limb amputation. This study investigated the accuracy and precision of prosthetic and intact foot placement during a targeted stepping task in individuals with unilateral transtibial amputation (IUTAs; N = 8, 47 ± 13 yrs), compared to the preferred foot of control participant's (N = 8, 33 ± 15 yrs). Participants walked along a 10-metre walkway, placing their foot into a rectangular floor-based target with dimensions normalised to a percentage of participant's foot length and width; 'standard' = 150% x 150%, 'wide' = 150% x 200%, 'long' = 200% x 150%. Foot placement accuracy (relative distance between foot and target centre), precision (between-trial variability), and foot-reach kinematics were determined for each limb and target, using three-dimensional motion capture. A significant foot-by-target interaction revealed less mediolateral foot placement accuracy for IUTAs in the wide target, which was significantly less accurate for the intact (28 ± 12 mm) compared to prosthetic foot (16 ± 14 mm). Intact peak foot velocity (4.6 ± 0.8 m.s) was greater than the prosthetic foot (4.5 ± 0.8 m.s) for all targets. Controls were more accurate and precise than IUTAs, regardless of target size. Less accurate and precise intact foot placement in IUTAs, coupled with a faster moving intact limb, is likely due to several factors including reduced proprioceptive feedback and active control during prosthetic limb single stance. This could affect activities of daily living where foot placement is critical, such as negotiating cluttered travel paths or obstacles whilst maintaining balance.
在日常生活活动中,准确的足部放置对于动态平衡很重要。感觉信息的中断和假肢部件的特性可能会增加下肢截肢者的运动任务难度。本研究调查了单侧胫骨截肢者(IUTAs;N = 8,47±13岁)在目标跨步任务中假肢和健全足部放置的准确性和精确性,并与对照组参与者(N = 8,33±15岁)的优势脚进行了比较。参与者沿着一条10米长的走道行走,将脚放入一个基于地面的矩形目标中,目标尺寸根据参与者脚的长度和宽度的百分比进行归一化;“标准”= 150%×150%,“宽”= 150%×200%,“长”= 200%×150%。使用三维运动捕捉确定每个肢体和目标的足部放置准确性(脚与目标中心之间的相对距离)、精确性(试验间变异性)和足部伸展运动学。显著的足部×目标交互作用表明,IUTAs在宽目标中的内外侧足部放置准确性较低,与假肢脚(16±14毫米)相比,健全脚(28±12毫米)的准确性明显较低。对于所有目标,健全脚的峰值速度(4.6±0.8米/秒)大于假肢脚(4.5±0.8米/秒)。无论目标大小如何,对照组都比IUTAs更准确、更精确。IUTAs中健全足部放置的准确性和精确性较低,再加上健全肢体移动速度较快,可能是由于多种因素造成的,包括本体感觉反馈减少和假肢单支撑期间的主动控制。这可能会影响足部放置至关重要的日常生活活动,例如在保持平衡的同时穿越杂乱的行进路径或障碍物。