Suppr超能文献

《患者用药记忆随访在青光眼患者中的疗效》。

The Efficacy of the After-visit Summary in Medication Recall Among Glaucoma Patients.

机构信息

School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC.

College of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse.

出版信息

J Glaucoma. 2020 Jul;29(7):529-535. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001518.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

PRéCIS:: To assess the after-visit summary (AVS) as a tool for glaucoma medication recall. Medication recall was associated with level of education and complexity of medication regimen. Receiving an AVS was not associated with better medication recall.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients given the AVS have better or worse glaucoma medication recall.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Observational clinical study. Adults on ≥1 glaucoma medications examined between June 30, 2017 and August 2, 2017.

DATA COLLECTION

in-person questionnaire and retrospective chart review. Self-reported glaucoma medications compared with prescribed glaucoma medication regimen verified by electronic medical record. Medication recall assessed using 3-point scoring: 1 point each for; (1) name or color of bottle or cap; (2) treatment eye(s); and (3) dosing regimen.

DATA ANALYSIS

2-sample Welch t test, 2-proportion z-test, analysis of variance, univariate, and multivariate regression.

RESULTS

A total of 118 patients enrolled: age 69.7±12.9 years (mean±SD), 55.9% of patients had received an AVS at the previous visit. Of these, 33.3% reported receiving an AVS, 51.2% reported not receiving one (15.1% did not recall or respond). Patients who had received AVSs had lower medication recall scores than those who did not (2.4±1.0 vs. 2.7±0.6, P=0.04). Receipt of an AVS was associated with having Nisha Chadha as their provider (P=0.01), fewer days since prior visit (P=0.0001), and medication regimen change at prior visit (P<0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed completion of associate's degree or higher and fewer prescribed medications to be independent predictors of higher recall score (P=0.0002 and 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

AVSs were conceived to enhance patient care. This study indicates this goal is not achieved consistently. Less education and more complex medication regimens were identified as barriers to medication recall. Additional investigations should explore if modifying this document and enhanced explanation of its use will impact medication recall and health outcomes.

摘要

未加标签

摘要:评估就诊后总结(AVS)作为一种青光眼药物记忆工具。药物记忆与教育水平和药物方案的复杂性相关。接受 AVS 与更好的药物记忆无关。

目的

本研究旨在确定给予 AVS 的患者是否具有更好或更差的青光眼药物记忆。

材料和方法

观察性临床研究。2017 年 6 月 30 日至 2017 年 8 月 2 日期间检查的至少使用 1 种青光眼药物的成年人。

数据收集

面对面问卷调查和病历回顾。通过电子病历验证自我报告的青光眼药物与处方的青光眼药物方案进行比较。使用 3 分制评估药物记忆:每瓶或帽的名称或颜色记 1 分;(2)治疗眼(s);和(3)剂量方案。

数据分析

两样本 Welch t 检验、两比例 z 检验、方差分析、单变量和多变量回归。

结果

共纳入 118 例患者:年龄 69.7±12.9 岁(均值±标准差),55.9%的患者在上次就诊时收到了 AVS。其中,33.3%的患者报告收到了 AVS,51.2%的患者报告未收到(15.1%未回忆或未回答)。接受过 AVS 的患者的药物记忆评分低于未接受过 AVS 的患者(2.4±1.0 与 2.7±0.6,P=0.04)。接受 AVS 与 Nisha Chadha 作为其提供者有关(P=0.01)、就诊间隔时间较短(P=0.0001)和上次就诊时药物方案改变有关(P<0.0001)。多变量分析显示,完成副学士学位或更高学历以及服用的药物较少是记忆评分较高的独立预测因素(P=0.0002 和 0.002)。

结论

AVS 的设计初衷是增强患者护理。本研究表明,这一目标并未始终实现。受教育程度较低和药物方案更复杂被确定为药物记忆障碍的障碍。应进一步研究是否修改该文件并加强对其使用的解释是否会影响药物记忆和健康结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验