Schmidt Andrew H, Di Junrui, Zipunnikov Vadim, Frey Katherine P, Scharfstein Daniel O, O'Toole Robert V, Bosse Michael J, Obremskey William T, Stinner Daniel J, Hayda Roman, Karunakar Madhav A, Hak David J, Carroll Eben A, Collins Susan C J, MacKenzie Ellen J
Department of Orthopaedics, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, MN.
Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
J Orthop Trauma. 2020 Jun;34(6):287-293. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001719.
To evaluate the diagnostic performance of perfusion pressure (PP) thresholds for fasciotomy.
Prospective observational study.
Seven Level-1 trauma centers.
PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty adults with severe leg injuries and ≥2 hours of continuous PP data who had been enrolled in a multicenter observational trial designed to develop a clinical prediction rule for acute compartment syndrome (ACS).
For each patient, a given PP criterion was positive if it was below the specified threshold for at least 2 consecutive hours. The diagnostic performance of PP thresholds between 10 and 30 mm Hg was determined using 2 reference standards for comparison: (1) the likelihood of ACS as determined by an expert panel who reviewed each patient's data portfolio or (2) whether the patient underwent fasciotomy.
Using the likelihood of ACS as the diagnostic standard (ACS considered present if median likelihood ≥70%, absent if <30%), a PP threshold of 30 mm Hg had diagnostic sensitivity 0.83, specificity 0.53, positive predictive value 0.07, and negative predictive value 0.99. Results were insensitive to more strict likelihood categorizations and were similar for other PP thresholds between 10- and 25-mm Hg. Using fasciotomy as the reference standard, the same PP threshold had diagnostic sensitivity 0.50, specificity 0.50, positive predictive value 0.04, negative predictive value 0.96.
No value of PP from 10 to 30 mm Hg had acceptable diagnostic performance, regardless of which reference diagnostic standard was used. These data question current practice of diagnosing ACS based on PP and suggest the need for further research.
Diagnostic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
评估用于筋膜切开术的灌注压(PP)阈值的诊断性能。
前瞻性观察性研究。
7个一级创伤中心。
患者/参与者:150名成年严重腿部受伤患者,有≥2小时的连续PP数据,这些患者参加了一项多中心观察性试验,该试验旨在制定急性筋膜室综合征(ACS)的临床预测规则。
对于每位患者,如果给定的PP标准连续至少2小时低于指定阈值,则该标准为阳性。使用2种参考标准来确定10至30毫米汞柱之间PP阈值的诊断性能,以便进行比较:(1)由审查每位患者数据组合的专家小组确定的ACS可能性;或(2)患者是否接受了筋膜切开术。
以ACS可能性作为诊断标准(如果中位可能性≥70%,则认为存在ACS;如果<30%,则认为不存在),PP阈值为30毫米汞柱时,诊断敏感性为0.83,特异性为0. fifty-three,阳性预测值为0.07,阴性预测值为0.99。结果对更严格的可能性分类不敏感,并且对于10至25毫米汞柱之间的其他PP阈值而言结果相似。以筋膜切开术作为参考标准,相同的PP阈值诊断敏感性为0.50,特异性为0.50,阳性预测值为0.04,阴性预测值为0.96。
无论使用哪种参考诊断标准,10至30毫米汞柱的PP值均未表现出可接受的诊断性能。这些数据对当前基于PP诊断ACS的做法提出质疑,并表明需要进一步研究。
诊断性I级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅《作者须知》。