Suppr超能文献

抗血小板和/或抗凝治疗并不会增加 EUS 引导下胆道引流期间的出血不良事件。

Antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant treatment does not increase hemorrhagic adverse events during EUS-guided biliary drainage.

机构信息

2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Sep;92(3):659-666. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.04.038. Epub 2020 Apr 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

No data appear to have been reported regarding bleeding risk among patients receiving antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant treatment (AP/AC) during EUS-guided biliary drainage (BD) procedures. The aim of this study was to assess whether hemorrhagic adverse events associated with EUS-BD are increased in patients on AP/AC.

METHODS

Patients receiving AP/AC who underwent EUS-BD were retrospectively enrolled between May 2015 and August 2019. Patients who did not receive AP/AC and underwent EUS-BD in the same period were also enrolled as a control group.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-five patients who underwent EUS-BD were enrolled in this study. Among these, 154 patients were allocated to the control group and 41 patients to the AP/AC group. Overall frequency of adverse events did not differ significantly between the control group (16.2%, 25/154) and AC/AP group (17.1%, 6/41; P = .80). The overall bleeding event rate was 3.6% (7/195), with no significant difference between the 2 groups. No thromboembolic events were observed with or without interruption of AP/AC. According to logistic regression analysis, the use of AP/AC was not a risk factor significantly associated with bleeding events (odds ratio, 2.96; 95% confidence interval, .56-14.0; P = .18). On the other hand, a long procedure time (>20 minutes) was an independent risk factor associated with bleeding events.

CONCLUSIONS

Bleeding events appear to be infrequent among patients who undergo EUS-BD while continuing AP/AC.

摘要

背景与目的

目前尚无数据报道在超声内镜引导下胆道引流术(EUS-BD)期间接受抗血小板和/或抗凝治疗(AP/AC)的患者出血风险。本研究旨在评估接受 AP/AC 的患者行 EUS-BD 是否会增加与 EUS-BD 相关的出血不良事件。

方法

回顾性纳入 2015 年 5 月至 2019 年 8 月期间接受 EUS-BD 且接受 AP/AC 治疗的患者。同时纳入同期未接受 AP/AC 治疗且接受 EUS-BD 的患者作为对照组。

结果

本研究共纳入 195 例行 EUS-BD 的患者。其中 154 例患者被分配至对照组,41 例患者被分配至 AP/AC 组。对照组(16.2%,25/154)和 AP/AC 组(17.1%,6/41)不良事件的总发生率无显著差异(P=.80)。两组的总体出血事件发生率均为 3.6%(7/195)。无血栓栓塞事件发生,无论是否中断 AP/AC。Logistic 回归分析显示,使用 AP/AC 不是与出血事件显著相关的危险因素(比值比,2.96;95%置信区间,.56-14.0;P=.18)。另一方面,较长的手术时间(>20 分钟)是与出血事件相关的独立危险因素。

结论

在继续接受 AP/AC 的情况下,行 EUS-BD 的患者出血事件似乎并不常见。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验