• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜后腘绳肌成形术:一种个体化的治疗方法。

Laparoscopic posterior cruroplasty: a patient tailored approach.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Division of General Surgery, University of Milan, Istitituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy.

Department of Surgery, University of Insubria, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Milano, Italy.

出版信息

Hernia. 2022 Apr;26(2):619-626. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02188-5. Epub 2020 Apr 25.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-020-02188-5
PMID:32335756
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Different surgical variations have been described for laparoscopic crural repair however, the technique is not standardized and left to the surgeons' preference.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to describe a standardized "patient tailored" approach for laparoscopic posterior cruroplasty in the setting of elective hiatal hernia repair.

METHODS

Retrospective single-center study was conducted (November 2015 to November 2019). The technical aspects of a standardized "patient tailored" laparoscopic posterior crural repair are described. Perioperative outcomes and patients' quality of life, measured with the disease specific Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) and generic Short Form-36 (SF-36), were analyzed.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-one patients were treated for symptomatic hiatal hernia according to the described "patient tailored" concept. Overall, 102 (72.3%) patients underwent simple suture repair while simple suture repair buttressed with biosynthetic resorbable U shaped mesh [Phasix ST-Bard] was used in 39 (27.7%) patients. Toupet fundoplication was fashioned in all patients. The median operative time was 131 min (IQR 55-240). No intraoperative complications or conversion to open surgery occurred. The median postoperative stay was 1.8 days (range 1-7). The overall postoperative complication rate was 4.2%. The median follow-up was 21 months (IQR range 1-34) with 102 patients having a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Recurrent hernia was diagnosed in three patients (2.1%), but none required reoperation. No mesh-related complications occurred. Compared to baseline, the median GERD-HRQL (p = 0.003) and all SF-36 items (p < 0.001) were significantly improved.

CONCLUSION

The application of a standardized "patient tailored" concept for laparoscopic posterior cruroplasty seems safe and effective in the medium-term follow-up with promising perioperative outcomes and quality of life improvement. This approach may be valuable to assure procedure reproducibility, standardization, and to uniformly interpret the outcomes.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜耻骨修复术已有多种手术方式,但该技术尚未标准化,取决于术者的偏好。

目的

本研究旨在描述一种标准化的“个体化”腹腔镜后耻骨成形术方法,用于择期食管裂孔疝修补术。

方法

本研究为回顾性单中心研究(2015 年 11 月至 2019 年 11 月)。描述了一种标准化的“个体化”腹腔镜后耻骨修复技术。分析了围手术期结果和患者生活质量,采用特定于疾病的胃食管反流病健康相关生活质量量表(GERD-HRQL)和通用 36 项简短健康状况调查问卷(SF-36)进行评估。

结果

141 例有症状的食管裂孔疝患者采用描述的“个体化”概念进行治疗。总体而言,102 例(72.3%)患者接受单纯缝合修复,39 例(27.7%)患者接受单纯缝合修复联合生物可吸收 U 形网片[Phasix ST-Bard]加固。所有患者均行 Toupet 胃底折叠术。中位手术时间为 131 分钟(IQR 55-240)。无术中并发症或中转开放手术。中位术后住院时间为 1.8 天(范围 1-7)。总术后并发症发生率为 4.2%。中位随访时间为 21 个月(IQR 范围 1-34),102 例患者的随访时间至少为 6 个月。3 例(2.1%)患者诊断为复发性疝,但均无需再次手术。无网片相关并发症。与基线相比,GERD-HRQL 中位数(p=0.003)和所有 SF-36 项目中位数(p<0.001)均显著改善。

结论

在中期随访中,应用标准化的“个体化”概念进行腹腔镜后耻骨成形术似乎是安全有效的,具有良好的围手术期结果和生活质量改善。这种方法对于确保手术的可重复性、标准化和统一解释结果可能具有重要价值。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic posterior cruroplasty: a patient tailored approach.腹腔镜后腘绳肌成形术:一种个体化的治疗方法。
Hernia. 2022 Apr;26(2):619-626. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02188-5. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
2
Patient-tailored algorithm for laparoscopic cruroplasty standardization: comparison with hiatal surface area and medium-term outcomes.患者个体化腹腔镜环缩术标准化算法:与食管裂孔面积的比较和中期结果。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Sep;407(6):2537-2545. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02556-y. Epub 2022 May 18.
3
Medium-term safety and efficacy profile of paraesophageal hernia repair with Phasix-ST mesh: a single-institution experience.使用Phasix-ST补片修复食管旁疝的中期安全性和疗效概况:单机构经验
Hernia. 2022 Feb;26(1):279-286. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02528-z. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
4
Does crural repair with biosynthetic mesh improve outcomes of revisional surgery for recurrent hiatal hernia?生物合成补片修复股疝是否能改善复发性食管裂孔疝修复手术的结果?
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1687-1695. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03023-x. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
5
Safety and Efficacy of Crura Augmentation with Phasix ST Mesh for Large Hiatal Hernia: 3-Year Single-Center Experience.使用Phasix ST网片进行脚增强术治疗大型食管裂孔疝的安全性和有效性:单中心3年经验
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Apr;30(4):369-372. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0726. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
6
Medium term (> 12 months) outcomes after laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair without conventional fundoplication using PH4B-mesh implant (Phasix™) in 176 reflux patients: experience and technique.176 例反流患者腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术(Phasix™)中使用 PH4B 网片无传统胃底折叠术的中期(>12 个月)结果:经验与技术。
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1641-1647. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-02999-w. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
7
Laparoscopic management of large hiatal hernia: mesh method with the use of ProGrip mesh versus standard crural repair.腹腔镜治疗巨大食管裂孔疝:使用 ProGrip 网片的网片方法与标准裂孔修补术的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Aug;32(8):3592-3598. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6087-2. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
8
Laparoscopic management of large hiatus hernia: five-year cohort study and comparison of mesh-augmented versus standard crura repair.腹腔镜治疗大型食管裂孔疝:五年队列研究及网片增强与标准脚修复的比较
Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec;30(12):5404-5409. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4897-7. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
9
Impact of Laparoscopic Repair of Large Hiatus Hernia on Quality of Life: Observational Cohort Study.腹腔镜修补巨大食管裂孔疝对生活质量的影响:观察性队列研究。
Dig Surg. 2019;36(5):402-408. doi: 10.1159/000490359. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
10
Large Hiatal Hernia Repair with Urinary Bladder Matrix Graft Reinforcement and Concomitant Sleeve Gastrectomy.采用膀胱基质移植物强化及同期袖状胃切除术治疗大型食管裂孔疝修补术
JSLS. 2019 Jan-Mar;23(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2018.00106.

引用本文的文献

1
Removal of the sac during surgery for the repair of "giant" paraesophageal hernias.在手术修复“巨大”食管旁疝时切除囊袋。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Jul 27;17(7):106365. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.106365.
2
Frailty predicts recurrence after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with mesh cruroplasty for giant sliding hiatal hernia with severe reflux esophagitis in elderly patients: a multicenter retrospective study.虚弱可预测老年严重反流性食管炎合并巨大滑动性食管裂孔疝患者行腹腔镜Nissen胃底折叠术加网状膈肌成形术后的复发情况:一项多中心回顾性研究
Hernia. 2025 Jul 18;29(1):235. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03416-6.
3
Postoperative obstruction of recurrent esophageal hiatal hernia: A case report.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review and updated network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic, and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.系统评价和更新的网络荟萃分析比较了开腹、腹腔镜和机器人胰十二指肠切除术。
Updates Surg. 2021 Jun;73(3):909-922. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00916-1. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
2
Manometric Esophageal Length to Height (MELH) Ratio Predicts Hiatal Hernia Recurrence.测压食管长度与身高比(MELH)预测食管裂孔疝复发。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2020 Jul;54(6):e56-e62. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001316.
3
Is that 'floppy' fundoplication tight enough?
复发性食管裂孔疝术后梗阻:一例报告。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Apr 11;104(15):e41955. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041955.
4
PROsthetic MEsh Reinforcement in elective minimally invasive paraesophageal hernia repair (PROMER): an international survey.择期微创食管裂孔疝修补术中补片加强(PROMER):国际调查。
Updates Surg. 2024 Nov;76(7):2675-2682. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-02010-2. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
5
Hot topics in Hiatal Hernia.食管裂孔疝的热点话题。
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1495-1496. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03176-9. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
6
Does crural repair with biosynthetic mesh improve outcomes of revisional surgery for recurrent hiatal hernia?生物合成补片修复股疝是否能改善复发性食管裂孔疝修复手术的结果?
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1687-1695. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03023-x. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
7
Mesh vs. non-mesh repair of type I hiatal hernias: a propensity-score matching analysis of 6533 patients from the Herniamed registry.网状修补与非网状修补治疗 I 型食管裂孔疝:来自 Herniamed 登记处的 6533 例患者的倾向评分匹配分析。
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1667-1678. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03013-z. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
8
Comment on "Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: to Mesh or Not to Mesh".关于《腹腔镜食管旁疝修补术:是否使用补片》的评论
Ann Surg Open. 2023 Jun 28;4(3):e304. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000304. eCollection 2023 Sep.
9
Fully resorbable poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) mesh for soft tissue repair and reconstruction: A scoping review.用于软组织修复与重建的全可吸收聚4-羟基丁酸酯(P4HB)补片:一项范围综述。
Front Surg. 2023 Apr 12;10:1157661. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1157661. eCollection 2023.
10
Comment to: Laparoscopic posterior cruroplasty: a patient tailored approach. Authors' reply.对《腹腔镜后交叉韧带成形术:个体化患者治疗方法》的评论。作者回复。
Hernia. 2023 Jun;27(3):717-718. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02777-0. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
那个“松软”的胃底折叠术是否足够牢固?
Surg Endosc. 2020 Apr;34(4):1823-1828. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06947-z. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
4
Intraluminal mesh erosion after prosthetic hiatoplasty: incidence, management, and outcomes.补片后食管腔内穿孔:发生率、处理方法和结果。
Dis Esophagus. 2019 Jul 1;32(7). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy131.
5
Mid-term safety profile evaluation of Bio-A absorbable synthetic mesh as cruroplasty reinforcement.Bio-A 可吸收合成网作为盆底重建加固材料的中期安全性评价。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Nov;33(11):3783-3789. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06676-3. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
6
Long-term efficacy of laparoscopic Nissen versus Toupet fundoplication for the management of types III and IV hiatal hernias.腹腔镜 Nissen 与 Toupet 胃底折叠术治疗 III 型和 IV 型食管裂孔疝的长期疗效。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Sep;33(9):2895-2900. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6589-y. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
7
Crural Closure improves Outcomes of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation in GERD patients with Hiatal Hernia.胃食管反流病伴食管裂孔疝患者行磁括约肌增强术后行胃底折叠术可改善结局。
Sci Rep. 2018 May 9;8(1):7319. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24322-1.
8
Early results of magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis.磁括约肌增强术与胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病的早期结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2018 Apr;52:82-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.02.041. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
9
Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic mesh versus suture repair of hiatus hernia: objective and subjective outcomes.腹腔镜网片与缝合修复食管裂孔疝的系统评价和荟萃分析:客观和主观结果。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):4913-4922. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5586-x. Epub 2017 May 18.
10
Crura augmentation with Bio-A mesh for laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernia: single-institution experience with 100 consecutive patients.使用生物A网片进行脚增宽术以腹腔镜修补食管裂孔疝:单机构连续100例患者的经验
Hernia. 2017 Aug;21(4):623-628. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1603-1. Epub 2017 Apr 10.