University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA.
Division of General Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2019 Sep;33(9):2895-2900. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6589-y. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair via Toupet or Nissen fundoplication remains the most commonly performed procedures for management of large hiatal hernia. Few studies have compared the procedures' long-term effectiveness. This study sought to characterize the efficacy of laparoscopic Toupet versus Nissen fundoplication for types III and IV hiatal hernia.
With IRB approval, a review of all laparoscopic hiatal hernia repairs with mesh reinforcement performed over 7 years at a single center by one surgeon was conducted. Hiatal hernias were classified as type III or IV using operative reports and preoperative imaging. Patients with type I, II, or recurrent hiatal hernia and patients receiving concomitant procedures were excluded. The GERD-Health Related Quality of Life Survey was administered by telephone no earlier than 18 months postoperatively.
A total of 473 patients underwent laparoscopic fundoplication; 179 having type III or IV hiatal hernia met inclusion criteria; 62 underwent Toupet, 117 underwent Nissen fundoplication. Average patient age was 64 years; 63% of patients were female. Cohorts were similar in demographics, comorbidities, and intraoperative factors. Survey was completed by 77 patients (43%): 50 having Nissen and 27 Toupet. Median time of survey completion after surgery was 54 months (Nissen) and 25 months (Toupet). Median survey responses across all items for both groups were 0 (no symptoms) with no significant variation between groups. Of patients that had Nissen, 26% reported current proton-pump inhibitor use versus 31% of Toupet patients (p = 0.486). Patient-reported satisfaction with current condition was similar between groups (67% Toupet, 72% Nissen, p = 0.351).
Patient-reported symptoms and satisfaction did not vary for patients receiving laparoscopic Nissen versus Toupet fundoplication, which may indicate that patients with large type III and IV hiatal hernia undergoing either procedure have similar long-term postoperative symptom control.
腹腔镜经贲门或尼森胃底折叠术修复巨大食管裂孔疝仍然是治疗大型食管裂孔疝最常用的方法。很少有研究比较这些手术的长期疗效。本研究旨在探讨腹腔镜经贲门与尼森胃底折叠术治疗 III 型和 IV 型食管裂孔疝的疗效。
经机构审查委员会批准,回顾了一名外科医生在一家中心 7 年内进行的所有腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术,其中使用网片加强。根据手术报告和术前影像学检查将食管裂孔疝分为 III 型或 IV 型。排除 I 型、II 型或复发性食管裂孔疝患者以及接受联合手术的患者。术后至少 18 个月,通过电话进行 GERD-健康相关生活质量调查。
共 473 例患者接受腹腔镜胃底折叠术;179 例 III 型或 IV 型食管裂孔疝符合纳入标准;62 例行经贲门手术,117 例行尼森胃底折叠术。患者平均年龄为 64 岁;63%为女性。两组在人口统计学、合并症和术中因素方面相似。共有 77 例患者(43%)完成了调查:50 例为尼森组,27 例为经贲门组。尼森组术后完成调查的中位数时间为 54 个月,经贲门组为 25 个月。两组所有项目的中位数调查结果均为 0(无症状),两组间无显著差异。在接受尼森治疗的患者中,26%的患者目前正在使用质子泵抑制剂,而经贲门治疗的患者中这一比例为 31%(p=0.486)。两组患者对目前状况的满意度相似(67%的经贲门组,72%的尼森组,p=0.351)。
接受腹腔镜尼森与经贲门胃底折叠术的患者报告的症状和满意度没有差异,这可能表明接受大型 III 型和 IV 型食管裂孔疝手术的患者术后长期症状控制相似。