Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Dementia Research Center, University College London, London, UK.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2020 Oct;26(9):918-926. doi: 10.1017/S1355617720000375. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
Episodic memory is impaired in Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia but thought to be relatively spared in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). This view is challenged by evidence of memory impairment in bvFTD. This study investigated differences in recognition memory performance between bvFTD and AD.
We performed a retrospective analysis on the recognition trial of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test in patients with bvFTD (n = 85), AD (n = 55), and control participants (n = 59). Age- and education-adjusted between-group analysis was performed on the total score and indices of discriminative ability and response bias. Correlations between recognition and measures of memory, language, executive functioning, and construction were examined.
Patients with AD had a significantly lower total recognition score than patients with bvFTD (control 28.8 ± 1.5; bvFTD 24.8 ± 4.5; AD 23.4 ± 3.6, p < .01). Both bvFTD and AD had worse discriminative ability than controls (A' control 0.96 ± 0.03; bvFTD 0.87 ± 0.03; AD 0.84 ± 0.10, p < .01), but there was no difference in response bias (B" control 0.9 ± 0.2; bvFTD 1.6 ± 1.47; AD 1.4± 1.4, p < .01). AD had worse discriminability than bvFTD (p < .05). Discriminability was associated with memory for both patient groups (median correlation coefficient r = .34) and additionally associated with language (r = .31), but not executive functioning (r = -.03) in bvFTD. Response bias was unrelated to other cognitive functions (r = -.02).
Discriminability, but not response bias, differentiated patients with bvFTD from AD. The presence of an impaired discrimination index suggests a "pure" (recognition) memory deficit in bvFTD.
阿尔茨海默病(AD)痴呆患者的情节记忆受损,但行为变异额颞叶痴呆(bvFTD)患者的情节记忆被认为相对不受影响。这一观点受到了 bvFTD 患者记忆受损的证据的挑战。本研究旨在比较 bvFTD 和 AD 患者在再认记忆表现上的差异。
我们对 85 例 bvFTD 患者、55 例 AD 患者和 59 名对照组参与者的 Rey 听觉言语学习测试再认测验进行了回顾性分析。对总评分以及辨别能力和反应偏差指数进行了年龄和教育调整的组间分析。检验了再认与记忆、语言、执行功能和结构测量之间的相关性。
AD 患者的总再认评分明显低于 bvFTD 患者(对照组 28.8 ± 1.5;bvFTD 24.8 ± 4.5;AD 23.4 ± 3.6,p <.01)。与对照组相比,bvFTD 和 AD 患者的辨别能力均较差(A' 对照组 0.96 ± 0.03;bvFTD 0.87 ± 0.03;AD 0.84 ± 0.10,p <.01),但反应偏差无差异(B" 对照组 0.9 ± 0.2;bvFTD 1.6 ± 1.47;AD 1.4 ± 1.4,p <.01)。AD 患者的辨别力明显低于 bvFTD(p <.05)。辨别力与两组患者的记忆相关(中位数相关系数 r =.34),与语言相关(r =.31),与 bvFTD 中的执行功能无关(r = -.03)。反应偏差与其他认知功能无关(r = -.02)。
辨别力而不是反应偏差可区分 bvFTD 患者和 AD 患者。辨别指数受损表明 bvFTD 存在“单纯”(再认)记忆缺陷。