• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

感谢您的捐赠:对澳大利亚献血者和非献血者对非现金献血激励措施的取向的调查。

Thank you for donating: a survey of Australian donors' and nondonors' orientations toward noncash incentives for blood donation.

机构信息

Research and Development, The Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2020 Jul;60(7):1454-1462. doi: 10.1111/trf.15806. Epub 2020 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1111/trf.15806
PMID:32339296
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to understand Australian donors' and nondonors' orientations toward 13 noncash incentives for blood and plasma donation and the associations between orientations and intention to donate (nondonors) and subsequent donation (donors).

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A survey of 1028 donors and 1201 nondonors was conducted online and by telephone. Donors were randomly selected from the Australian Red Cross Lifeblood donor panel; nondonors were selected from randomly generated fixed line and mobile telephone numbers across Australia. Incentives were chosen to reflect a wide array of possible noncash incentives that might be introduced by blood donation organizations (BDOs). Differences between donors and nondonors, as well as other subgroups, were investigated.

RESULTS

Orientations toward most types of incentives were positive or neutral. No significant differences were observed between incentive orientations for whole blood versus plasma donations. Many subgroup differences were small but statistically significant. There were mostly small, positive, significant associations between nondonors' intention to donate and orientations toward noncash incentives; there were mostly no significant associations between donors' orientations and subsequent donation behaviors.

CONCLUSION

The findings from this study suggest that BDOs that wish to trial noncash incentives in voluntary nonremunerative systems can be confident that neither donors nor potential donors will react negatively. They also indicate that BDOs have some flexibility in deciding which incentives to trial.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在了解澳大利亚献血者和非献血者对 13 种非现金献血激励措施的态度,以及这些态度与献血意愿(非献血者)和随后的献血(献血者)之间的关联。

研究设计与方法

对 1028 名献血者和 1201 名非献血者进行了在线和电话调查。献血者是从澳大利亚红十字会生命血库献血者小组中随机选择的;非献血者是从澳大利亚各地随机生成的固定电话和移动电话号码中选择的。激励措施的选择反映了血液捐赠组织(BDO)可能引入的广泛的非现金激励措施。研究了献血者和非献血者之间以及其他亚组之间的差异。

结果

大多数类型的激励措施的态度都是积极或中立的。全血与血浆捐赠的激励措施取向没有显著差异。许多亚组差异很小但具有统计学意义。非献血者的献血意愿与非现金激励措施的取向之间存在着小而积极的显著关联;而献血者的取向与随后的献血行为之间则没有显著关联。

结论

本研究的结果表明,希望在自愿非补偿性系统中试行非现金激励措施的 BDO 可以放心,无论是献血者还是潜在的献血者都不会做出负面反应。它们还表明,BDO 在决定试行哪些激励措施方面具有一定的灵活性。

相似文献

1
Thank you for donating: a survey of Australian donors' and nondonors' orientations toward noncash incentives for blood donation.感谢您的捐赠:对澳大利亚献血者和非献血者对非现金献血激励措施的取向的调查。
Transfusion. 2020 Jul;60(7):1454-1462. doi: 10.1111/trf.15806. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
2
Donors and nondonors: communication and information.捐赠者与非捐赠者:沟通与信息
Transfusion. 1975 Mar-Apr;15(2):165-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1975.15275122813.x.
3
Predicting intentions to donate blood among nondonors in Australia: an extended theory of planned behavior.预测澳大利亚非献血者的献血意愿:计划行为理论的扩展
Transfusion. 2008 Dec;48(12):2559-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01904.x. Epub 2008 Aug 20.
4
Blood donors' attitudes towards incentives: influence on motivation to donate.献血者对激励措施的态度:对献血动机的影响。
Blood Transfus. 2012 Apr;10(2):186-90. doi: 10.2450/2011.0039-11. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
5
Increasing nondonors' intention to give blood: addressing common barriers.提高非献血者的献血意愿:克服常见障碍。
Transfusion. 2016 Feb;56(2):433-9. doi: 10.1111/trf.13386. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
6
Understanding donation frequency: insights from current plasma donors.理解捐赠频率:来自当前血浆捐赠者的见解。
Vox Sang. 2020 Feb;115(2):174-181. doi: 10.1111/vox.12861. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
7
Blood donors' helping behavior is driven by warm glow: more evidence for the blood donor benevolence hypothesis.献血者的助人行为是由温暖的光芒驱动的:更多支持献血者仁慈假设的证据。
Transfusion. 2012 Oct;52(10):2189-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03557.x. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
8
A new perspective on the incentive-blood donation relationship: partnership, congruency, and affirmation of competence.关于激励性献血关系的新视角:伙伴关系、一致性和能力肯定。
Transfusion. 2012 Sep;52(9):1889-900. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03545.x. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
9
Eligible blood donors' decisions about donating stool for fecal microbiota transplantation: Does ambivalence play a role?适合的献血者对捐赠粪便用于粪便微生物群移植的决策:矛盾心理是否起作用?
Transfusion. 2021 Feb;61(2):474-483. doi: 10.1111/trf.16109. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
10
Blood donors and their changing engagement in other prosocial behaviors.献血者及其在其他亲社会行为中的变化参与。
Transfusion. 2019 Mar;59(3):1002-1015. doi: 10.1111/trf.15085. Epub 2018 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Gauging Incentive Values and Expectations (G.I.V.E.) among Blood Donors for Nonmonetary Incentives: Developing a Preference Elicitation Instrument through Qualitative Approaches in Shandong, China.衡量无偿献血者对非货币激励措施的激励价值和期望(G.I.V.E.):在中国山东通过定性方法开发一种偏好诱导工具
Patient. 2023 Nov;16(6):593-606. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00639-6. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
2
Designing and testing an ethnic-ancestry question for Australian blood donors: Acceptability, feasibility, and understanding.设计并测试澳大利亚献血者的族群问题:可接受性、可行性和理解度。
Transfus Med. 2022 Jun;32(3):237-242. doi: 10.1111/tme.12865. Epub 2022 Apr 21.